Skip to content

Resistant Starch and Satiety

Satiety Response of Resistant Starches

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01187875
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-08-24
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2012-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Adults

Keywords

satiety, dietary fiber

Brief summary

Dietary fiber consumption may contribute to weight regulation by improving satiety. In an earlier study the investigators found that a muffin containing resistant starch was more effective than other fibers in altering satiety. The objective of this study is to determine if 2 resistant starches consumed in muffins alter satiety and whether a mixture of resistant starches is more effective than either alone in enhancing satiety.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTPlacebo- Fiber free control

Dextrin control administered in a muffin treatment.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTHi-maize resistant starch 9g

9g Hi-maize resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTNovalose 330 resistant starch 9g

9g Novalose 330 resistant starch administered in a muffin treatment.

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT4.5g Hi-maize resistant starch and 4.5g Novalose 330

4.5g Hi-maize and 4.5g Novalose 330 in a muffin treatment.

Sponsors

University of Minnesota
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy men and women * Age 18-64 years * Non-smoking * Not taking medication * Non dieting (weight stable in prior 3 months) * BMI 18-27 * English literacy

Exclusion criteria

* Do not regularly consume breakfast * Food allergies to ingredients found in the study products * BMI \<18 or \>27 * Diagnosed cardiovascular disease, renal disease, hepatic disease, or diabetes mellitus * Cancer in previous 5 years * Any gastrointestinal disease or condition * Recent bacterial infection (\< 3months) * Recent or concurrent participation in an intervention research study * History of drug or alcohol abuse in prior 6 months * Use of lipid lowering, anti-hypertensive, or anti-inflammatory steroid medication * Eating disorder * Vegetarians * People who eat more than approximately 15 grams of fiber per day * Women who are pregnant or lactating * Women with irregular menstrual cycles

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Satiety response using visual analogue scales0 minutes postprandiallySatiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).
Satiety response using VAS15 minutes postprandiallySatiety response was measured using subjective perceptions of hunger, fullness, satisfaction, and prospective food intake evaluated by previously validated visual analogue scales (VAS).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ad libitum food intake240 minutes postprandially and over 24 hours
Breath hydrogen response0, 240 minutes
Gastrointestinal tolerance using visual analogue scales (VAS)24 hoursSubjective ratings of bloating, stool consistency, and flatulence on VAS. A stool count was also recorded.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026