Skip to content

Interexaminer Reliability, Outcomes for Manipulation of Cervical Dysfunction, 3-D Kinematics

Three-dimensional Study of Cervical Kinematics

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01186718
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-08-23
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2011-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Human Cervical Motions

Keywords

Cervical, motions, kinematics

Brief summary

The purpose of this project is to quantify 3-dimensional (3-D) cervical motion pattern changes that result from osteopathic manipulation treatment (OMT) in an experimental subject group diagnosed with somatic dysfunction. The kinematic data will include the entire 3-D motion trajectories of the head, resulting in range of motion (ROM) and angular data for the primary and secondary motions.

Detailed description

Our primary hypothesis is that kinematic changes will be detected after OMT for motions in the primary direction of the passive diagnostic test motions (cervical side-bending right and left), as well as angular rotations (deviations) occurring around these motions. Our secondary hypothesis is that examination of the kinematic data will provide objective inter- and intra-examiner data to assess similarities/differences occurring during the passive clinical exam before and after OMT. Lastly, we hypothesize that significant differences in the kinematic patterns will result between the two subject groups. This experiment is designed for the following clinical and biomechanical observations: * comparisons of diagnostic data between three osteopathic physicians, * comparisons of within-subject kinematic profiles pre- and post-treatment, * inter-examiner comparisons of kinematic motion paths occurring during diagnostic motions, * evaluate kinematic patterns between the two subject groups, and assess between group similarities/differences, * evaluate diagnostic and kinematic data relative to VAS, cervical disability, health status information, and SNF, * re-classify aspects of the kinematic data using a cluster (statistical) analysis procedure to compare with initial and secondary physician diagnostic data, and * to assess the stability of changes made by the OMT procedures and the kinematic response three days post-treatment.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

American Osteopathic Association
CollaboratorOTHER
Michigan State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cervical motion symmetry and asymmetry

Exclusion criteria

* Under 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
3-D kinematic measurements of cervical motion9/2009 to 8/2011

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026