Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Bone Marrow Stem Cells in Treating Spinal Cord Injury

Surgical Transplantation of Autologous Bone Marrow Stem Cells With Glial Scar Resection for Patients of Chronic Spinal Cord Injury and Intra-thecal Injection for Acute and Subacute Injury - A Preliminary Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01186679
Acronym
ABMST-SCI
Enrollment
12
Registered
2010-08-23
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2010-08-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Spinal Cord Injuries

Brief summary

The projected data related to the burden of spinal cord injuries induced limb paralysis in India is quite alarming. This is attributed to the rapid industrialization and economical development in the country. Increase in vehicular traffic has caused numerous road traffic accidents. Rapid increase in populations, development in the computer technology and real estate business lead to construction of huge buildings which indirectly adds to the injuries due to fall. Spinal cord injuries could not be treated adequately with the prevailing treatment modalities. In view of this, there is definitely an urgent need for finding different methods of treatment for these patients who cannot undergo established modalities of treatment or these have been tried unsuccessfully. Since a large number of these patients will loose their productive life and at the prime of their lives, one such alternate therapy, which seems to offer some promise, is stem cell therapy, which has been well studied and published in prestigious journals. In our present study, we want to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous bone marrow derived stem cells surgically transplanted directly into the lesion site with glial scar resection for 8 indian patients of chronic spinal cord injury and intra-thecal injection for 4 indian patients of acute and subacute injury.

Interventions

PROCEDURElaminectomy

surgical laminectomy with glial scar resection

PROCEDUREIntrathecal

direct into the CSF through lumbar puncture

Sponsors

International Stemcell Services Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Must be able to give voluntary (patients may not be able to write) consent. 2. Must be able to understand study information provided to him. 3. Patients with complete spinal cord trans-section: at least post 6 months after spinal cord Injury (in chronic patients), \< 2 weeks in acute category and 2-8 weeks in subacute patients. 4. The level of spinal cord injury must be between C4 and T12(neurological level) 5. Spinal cord injury categorized in terms of ASIA Impairment scale. 6. Age should be between 20-55 years

Exclusion criteria

* Mechanical ventilation due to neurological impairment * Multiple level trauma * Undetermined size and location of Spinal Cord injury * Gunshot or other penetrating trauma to the spinal cord * Longitudinal dimension of injury by MRI is greater than 3spinal segments * Associated severe head injury * More than 9cms long bone fracture * Women who are pregnant or lactating * Serious pre-existing medical conditions * Disease or impairment that precludes adequate neurological examination. * Should not have co-morbidities like Diabetes, Systemic Hypertension etc. * Severe co-morbidities/bed sores Tests positive for infectious diseases Deranged Coagulation profile and Hb \< 8mg/dl

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with adverse events as a measure of safety and tolerability. Significant clinical improvement in ASIA impairment scale and general condition18 monthsAmerican Spinal Injury Assessment scale of A,B,C,D or E

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in the MRI, Neurological improvement (cranial/spinal reflexes) and evoked potentials study18 monthsMRI findings of the lesion, Nerve conduction studies of the region and somatosensory evoked potentials of the same region

Countries

India

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026