Skip to content

Trial Comparing the Effects of Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training in Women With Operable Breast Cancer

Exercise Intensity Trial (EXCITE): A Randomized Trial Comparing the Effects of Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training in Women With Operable Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01186367
Acronym
Excite
Enrollment
174
Registered
2010-08-23
Start date
2010-11-11
Completion date
2023-05-17
Last updated
2025-02-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

breast cancer, Linear Versus Nonlinear Aerobic Training, 15-147

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of 3 different approaches to exercise training in women with early stage breast cancer who have completed all primary treatments (except hormone therapy, if appropriate). Prior research in women with early stage breast cancer has shown that some treatments may have an adverse impact on physical fitness levels leading to feelings of fatigue and poor quality of life. Supervised exercise training has been shown to reduce some of these side-effects. However, all the exercise programs have followed essentially the same approach. This study is designed to see if a different approach to exercise training is more effective than the conventional approach currently in use.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALLinear Aerobic Training

The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via either 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes per/session (± 10 minutes).

The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes/ per session (+/- 10 minutes).

All sessions are required to be supervised. Duration of the stretching sessions is prescribed and implemented in accordance with standard stretching and flexibility training principles. This approach will be applied to guide each participant's prescribed stretching plan, with dose and scheduling modifications made by exercise physiologists, as required.

OTHERBlood draws

Complete blood count

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 45-80 years * Female * Has been diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer * Post-menopausal, defined as : * Age ≥ 45 with no menses for at least 2 years * Chemically induced menopause through ovarian suppression, as determined by the primary oncologist * An interval of at least one year, but no more than five years, following the full completion of primary therapy for malignant disease. Primary therapy is defined as: * Surgery plus radiation * Surgery plus chemotherapy * Surgery plus trastuzumab * Surgery plus hormone therapy Note: For patients who receive hormone therapy following surgery, the definition of one-year post-completion of therapy is defined by the surgery date. Patients who are currently receiving hormone therapy are eligible for enrollment. * Weight of \< 205 kgs * ECOG status of 0 or 1 * Life expectancy ≥ 6 months * Performing less than 150 minutes of structured moderate-intensity or strenuous intensity exercise per week. * Exercise intolerance defined by a VO2peak below that predicted for sedentary age and sex-matched individuals as defined in Appendix H. * Willing to be randomized to one of the study arms * Able to complete an acceptable baseline CPET, in the absence of high risk ECG findings or other inappropriate response to exercise as determined by the investigator. * Able to achieve an acceptable peak baseline CPET, as defined by any of the following criteria: * Achieving a plateau in oxygen consumption, concurrent with an increase in power output; * A respiratory exchange ratio ≥ 1.10; * Attainment of maximal predicted heart rate (HRmax) (i.e., within 10 bpm of age-predicted HRmax \[HRmax = 220-Age\[years\]); * Volitional exhaustion, as measured by a rating of perceived exertion (RPE) ≥ 18 on the BORG scale.

Exclusion criteria

* Any of the following absolute contraindications to cardiopulmonary exercise testing: * Acute myocardial infarction within 3-5 days of any planned study procedures; * Unstable angina; * Uncontrolled arrhythmia causing symptoms or hemodynamic compromise; * Recurrent syncope; * Active endocarditis; * Acute myocarditis or pericarditis; * Symptomatic severe aortic stenosis; * Uncontrolled heart failure; * Acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction within 3 months of any planned study procedures * Thrombosis of lower extremities; * Suspected dissecting aneurysm; * Uncontrolled asthma; * Pulmonary edema; * Respiratory failure; * Acute non-cardiopulmonary disorders that may affect exercise performance or be aggravated by exercise (i.e., infection, renal failure, thyrotoxicosis); * Presence of any other concurrent, actively treated malignancy * History of any other malignancy treated within the past 3 years (other than non-melanoma skin cancer) * Presence of metastatic disease * Room air desaturation at rest ≤ 85% * Mental impairment leading to inability to cooperate * Any other condition or intercurrent illness that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the participant a poor candidate for the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.BaselineVO2 or peak oxygen consumption will be measured at Baseline

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Linear Aerobic Training
The ultimate goal is for participants to complete approximately 130-180 minutes/week of aerobic training, at 60% to 75 % of the individually determined exercise capacity (VO2peak), for 16 weeks. VO2peak will be determined by the second CPET performed at baseline. Linear Aerobic Training: The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via either 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes per/session (± 10 minutes). Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) Blood draws: Complete blood count
58
Nonlinear Aerobic Training
The ultimate goal is for participants to complete approximately 130-180 minutes/week of aerobic training at 55% to 100% of the individually determined exercise capacity (VO2peak), for 16 weeks. VO2peak will be determined by the second CPET performed at Baseline and as well as the CPET performed at Midpoint. Nonlinear Aerobic Training: The 130-180 minutes/week will be achieved via 3 to 4 individual aerobic training sessions at approximately 10 to 50 minutes/ per session (+/- 10 minutes). Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) Blood draws: Complete blood count
59
Progressive Stretching Group (Attention Control)
The ultimate goal for the progressive stretching program is 3 to 4 individual stretching sessions/week for 10 to 50 minutes per session (+/- 10 minutes). Progressive Stretching: All sessions are required to be supervised. Duration of the stretching sessions is prescribed and implemented in accordance with standard stretching and flexibility training principles. This approach will be applied to guide each participant's prescribed stretching plan, with dose and scheduling modifications made by exercise physiologists, as required. Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) Blood draws: Complete blood count
57
Total174

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDid not receive study treatment010
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up747

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLinear Aerobic TrainingTotalProgressive Stretching Group (Attention Control)Nonlinear Aerobic Training
Age, Continuous59 years58 years58 years58 years
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants5 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
51 Participants149 Participants48 Participants50 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants20 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants5 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
13 Participants35 Participants12 Participants10 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants19 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
38 Participants115 Participants37 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
58 Participants174 Participants57 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants174 Participants57 Participants59 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 580 / 591 / 57
other
Total, other adverse events
58 / 5859 / 598 / 57
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 580 / 590 / 57

Outcome results

Primary

To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

VO2 or peak oxygen consumption will be measured at Baseline

Time frame: Baseline

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linear Aerobic TrainingTo Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.21.5 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.4
Nonlinear Aerobic TrainingTo Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.22.2 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.3
Progressive Stretching Group (Attention Control)To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.21.8 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.8
Primary

To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

VO2 or peak oxygen consumption for nonlinear aerobic training will be measured at mid-point (8 weeks)

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: Only nonlinear aerobic training measured at 8 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Nonlinear Aerobic TrainingTo Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.22.6 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.5
Primary

To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.

VO2 or peak oxygen consumption will be measured at post-intervention (16 weeks).

Time frame: 16 weeks

Population: Nonlinear aerobic training measured at 16 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Linear Aerobic TrainingTo Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.22.2 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.6
Nonlinear Aerobic TrainingTo Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.23.1 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 4.8
Progressive Stretching Group (Attention Control)To Compare the Effect of High-intensity to Moderate-intensity Aerobic Training, Relative to Attention-control, on Peak Oxygen Consumption.21.8 mL/kg/minStandard Deviation 3.7

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026