Skip to content

Clinical Trial of Pioglitazone for Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation

Clinical Trial of Pioglitazone for Prevention of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy After Heart Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01186250
Enrollment
18
Registered
2010-08-23
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2013-12-31
Last updated
2016-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy

Keywords

cardiac allograft vasculopathy, pioglitazone, insulin resistance, heart transplant

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the benefit of using the FDA-approved insulin-sensitizing agent, Pioglitazone, on human heart transplant recipients. The objectives of this project are to (1) determine if pioglitazone effectively treats insulin resistance in heart transplant recipients, and (2) to determine whether pioglitazone therapy after heart transplantation impacts the development or progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), a form of chronic rejection after heart transplantation.

Detailed description

CAV, a rapidly progressive obliterative disease involving the graft coronary arteries, is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality beyond the first year after heart transplantation. This common complication occurs in almost half of recipients within 3 years after heart transplantation, and is associated with high rates of graft failure and mortality. Clinical care of heart transplant recipients in the current era is greatly limited by the lack of effective treatment options to prevent or retard the progression of CAV. CAV appears to be strongly associated with the state of insulin resistance, which is present in over half of heart transplant recipients and is characterized by metabolic abnormalities including glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, endothelial dysfunction, and high levels of circulating inflammatory markers. Insulin resistance can be effectively treated with pioglitazone, a TZD compound which directly affects tissue insulin sensitivity. In this study, we will enroll 32 insulin-resistant heart transplant recipients and will randomize them to pioglitazone or placebo for a one-year period. We will determine the efficacy of pioglitazone for the treatment of insulin resistance and prevention of the development and progression of CAV after heart transplantation. The data generated from this study will provide important preliminary data for future, larger-scale clinical investigations.

Interventions

DRUGPioglitazone

15mg pioglitazone taken daily for one month, 30mg pioglitazone taken daily for another month, 45mg pioglitazone taken daily for remaining ten months

DRUGPlacebo

placebo taken daily for one year

Sponsors

Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Heart transplant recipients, years 1-4 post-transplant 2. Age \>= 18 years 3. Fasting TG/HDL ratio\>=3.0 or Fasting TG\>=150 mg/dL

Exclusion criteria

1. Diabetes mellitus 2. Severe liver dysfunction (ALT\>=2.5 x upper limit of normal) 3. Severe renal dysfunction (GFR\<30 or Stage IV CKD) 4. Moderate-severe fluid retention 5. Clinical or echocardiographic signs of left ventricular dysfunction 6. Contraindication to coronary angiography and/or IVUS

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Insulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)Baseline and 1 yearChange from baseline in Insulin Levels During Oral Glucose Tolerance test at 1 year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 YearBaseline and 1 yearOral Glucose Tolerance Test : blood was drawn for fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, followed by ingestion of a solution containing 75grams of glucose. Repeat blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin levels at 30, 90, and 120 minutes after glucose ingestion. All glucose measurements were performed by the Clinical Translational Research Unit (CTRU) Stanford University.
Change From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One YearBaseline and 1 yearTriglyceride ratio to High Density Lipoprotien
Change in Intimal Volumebaseline and 1 yearIntimal volume is defined as external elastic membrane volume minus lumen (luminal) volume measured at the heart Catheterization and intravascular Ultrasound( IVUS)
Change From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.Baseline and 1 yearCompetitive ELISA assay in Stanford laboratory.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One YearBaseline and 1 yearmeasure of low levels of C-reactive protein to identify low but persistent levels of inflammation
Change in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)Baseline and 1 yearThe change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to one year was recorded for several matched sites in the same coronary artery, the cross sections, predominantly in the left anterior descending coronary artery, from baseline to one-year follow-up, were studied. The IVUS cross sections were matched by using identifiable landmarks in the images, such as bifurcations or arterial calcification, or external landmarks, such as coronary veins or pericardium. In addition, the one-year IVUS studies were obtained with an angiographic roadmap of where the initial IVUS study was performed along the length of the vessel. The IVUS system auto pullback was performed at .5 mm/s from the mid-distal portion of the study vessel, where an easily identifiable landmark was visible (i.e., branchpoint). The following items were measured for each patient: maximal intimal thickness (MIT), intimal area (IA), and vessel area.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pioglitazone
Pioglitazone Pioglitazone: 15mg pioglitazone taken daily for one month, 30mg pioglitazone taken daily for another month, 45mg pioglitazone taken daily for remaining ten months
9
Placebo
Placebo Placebo: placebo taken daily for one year
9
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboPioglitazoneTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
8 Participants8 Participants16 Participants
Age, Continuous49.2 years50.8 years50.0 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
9 participants9 participants18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 90 / 9
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 90 / 9

Outcome results

Primary

Insulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)

Change from baseline in Insulin Levels During Oral Glucose Tolerance test at 1 year.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
PioglitazoneInsulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)-47.7 h*pmol/L
PlaceboInsulin Levels Area Under Curve(AUC)10.7 h*pmol/L
Secondary

Change From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.

Competitive ELISA assay in Stanford laboratory.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: One participant in one arm did not have Baseline or one year data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.-0.05 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline in ADMA (Asymmetric Dimethylarginine) at One Year.-0.02 umol/LStandard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One Year

measure of low levels of C-reactive protein to identify low but persistent levels of inflammation

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: participant drop put

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One Year-3 mg/LStandard Deviation 3
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (HsCRP) at One Year2 mg/LStandard Deviation 4
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One Year

Triglyceride ratio to High Density Lipoprotien

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: One drop out

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One Year-0.03 ratioStandard Deviation 6
PlaceboChange From Baseline in TG/HDL Ratio at One Year-1.2 ratioStandard Deviation 3.3
Secondary

Change in Intimal Volume

Intimal volume is defined as external elastic membrane volume minus lumen (luminal) volume measured at the heart Catheterization and intravascular Ultrasound( IVUS)

Time frame: baseline and 1 year

Population: The number of participants enrolled were not all included in the intimal volume analysis because the Angiographic diagnostic evaluation needed for intimal volume measurement was clinically inappropriate for 3 in the pioglitazone arm and 5 in the Placebo arm at 12 months post transplant.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange in Intimal Volume12.2 mm^3Standard Deviation 39.9
PlaceboChange in Intimal Volume-26.8 mm^3Standard Deviation 46.7
Secondary

Change in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 Year

Oral Glucose Tolerance Test : blood was drawn for fasting plasma glucose and insulin levels, followed by ingestion of a solution containing 75grams of glucose. Repeat blood samples were collected for glucose and insulin levels at 30, 90, and 120 minutes after glucose ingestion. All glucose measurements were performed by the Clinical Translational Research Unit (CTRU) Stanford University.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: One participant in each group did not complete the OGTT.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 Year2.1 mg/dLStandard Deviation 19
PlaceboChange in Levels of Fasting Glucose at Baseline and 1 Year11 mg/dLStandard Deviation 33
Secondary

Change in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)

The change in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) from baseline to one year was recorded for several matched sites in the same coronary artery, the cross sections, predominantly in the left anterior descending coronary artery, from baseline to one-year follow-up, were studied. The IVUS cross sections were matched by using identifiable landmarks in the images, such as bifurcations or arterial calcification, or external landmarks, such as coronary veins or pericardium. In addition, the one-year IVUS studies were obtained with an angiographic roadmap of where the initial IVUS study was performed along the length of the vessel. The IVUS system auto pullback was performed at .5 mm/s from the mid-distal portion of the study vessel, where an easily identifiable landmark was visible (i.e., branchpoint). The following items were measured for each patient: maximal intimal thickness (MIT), intimal area (IA), and vessel area.

Time frame: Baseline and 1 year

Population: number participants analyzed contained drops out due to clinical reasons

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PioglitazoneChange in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)-0.01 mmStandard Deviation 0.3
PlaceboChange in Maximal Intimal Thickness(MIT) by Intravascular Unltrasound(IVUS)-0.02 mmStandard Deviation 0.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026