Skip to content

A Pychoeducational Intervention for Women With Diabetes

A Pychoeducational Intervention for Women With Diabetes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01185561
Acronym
SWEEP
Enrollment
74
Registered
2010-08-20
Start date
2007-03-31
Completion date
2009-11-30
Last updated
2016-12-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anger, Anxiety, Depression

Keywords

Diabetes, SWEEP, Dysphoria

Brief summary

This proposal describes a small randomized study to determine whether usual medical care (UMC) for diabetes combined with a psychoeducational program is more effective than UMC for diabetes alone. This program differs from other diabetes programs by focusing on the management of dysphoric symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger). Diabetes self-care behaviors will be discussed and measured, but they are not the primary focus of the intervention. The psychoeducational program will address: 1) education about how dysphoric symptoms affect glycemic control; 2) recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and 3) management of dysphoric symptoms using Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT). Subjects will be randomized to receive the group psychoeducational intervention or no additional treatment. All subjects will receive UMC for diabetes.

Detailed description

Diabetes is the fifth deadliest disease in the United States with no known cure, and cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in persons with diabetes. Diabetes is the only disease that causes women to have as much heart disease as men. The relative risk of cardiac mortality has been reported to be 2.6 for women with diabetes as compared to 1.9 for men with diabetes after controlling for other cardiac risk factors. While cardiac mortality for men with diabetes has declined (13.1%), there has been a 23% increase in age-adjusted cardiac mortality for women with diabetes. This poor outcome, occurring in a time of significant advances in the management of heart disease, suggests the need to consider directing treatment at other risk factors. Depression may be one such risk factor. Depression is an independent risk factor for CVD, and is associated with poorer self-management and decreased health-related quality of life. Approximately 25% of persons with diabetes have depression, and the rate of depression in women with diabetes is double that of men with diabetes. Women with diabetes exhibit worse diabetes self-care, glycemic control, and poorer quality of life than men with diabetes, which are exacerbated by depression. Other affective symptoms including anxiety and anger commonly accompany depressive symptoms appear to impose similar risks for poor medical outcomes, and occur more often in women with diabetes than men with diabetes. Research has shown that treatment of depression with medication and/or cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) effectively relieves depression and improves glycemic control in persons with diabetes. More recent evidence suggests that these benefits are more durable in patients treated with CBT vs. antidepressants alone. There has been no research on symptom clusters (i.e., depression, anxiety, and anger) in persons with diabetes, and their effect on glycemic control and self-management. In addition, a CBT program to treat a cluster of dysphoric symptoms has not been tested in persons with diabetes. Since women with diabetes have greater depression and anxiety, worse glycemic control, and increased cardiac mortality than men with diabetes, we are proposing to test the feasibility and effectiveness of a psychoeducational intervention to promote emotional health in women with type 2 diabetes. This proposal describes a small randomized controlled trial to determine whether usual medical care (UMC) for diabetes combined with a psychoeducational program is more effective than UMC for diabetes alone. This program differs from other diabetes programs by focusing on the management of dysphoric symptoms (depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger). Diabetes self-care behaviors will be discussed and measured, but they are not the primary focus of the intervention. The psychoeducational program will address: 1) education about how dysphoric symptoms affect glycemic control; 2) recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and 3) management of dysphoric symptoms using CBT. A repeated measures, experimental design will be used. Subjects will be randomized to receive the group psychoeducational intervention or no additional treatment. All subjects will receive UMC for diabetes. The aims and hypotheses for the study are: Primary Aim: To determine the effect of a psychoeducational intervention on dysphoric symptoms. The primary hypothesis is that women receiving a psychoeducational intervention plus UMC will report fewer dysphoric symptoms (depression, anxiety, and anger) at three and six months follow-up. Secondary Aim: To determine the effect of a psychoeducational intervention on glycemic control, diabetes self-management, and health-related quality of life. The secondary hypothesis is that women receiving a psychoeducational intervention plus UMC will have decreased hemoglobin A1c, report better diabetes self-management (increased self-care behaviors and self-efficacy), and report increased health-related quality of life (increased functional status, life satisfaction, and decreased diabetes-related distress) at three and six months follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPsychoeducational intervention

The intervention is group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the intervention comprises activities including (1) Education about how dysphoric symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger) affect glycemic control; (2) Recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and (3) Management of dysphoric symptoms using cognitive-behavioral skills.

Sponsors

Loyola University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. aged 18 to 75 years; 2. have type 2 diabetes greater than six months and being medically managed 3. score greater than or equal to 16 on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale which is indicative of depressive symptoms. 4. score greater than or equal to 12 on the CES-D plus a history of depression or currently being treated for depression.

Exclusion criteria

Women with current alcohol or substance abuse disorders, or a history of bipolar depression or any other psychotic disorder will be excluded. Women will also be excluded if they have a diabetes knowledge test score of less than 70% and severe complications of diabetes (blindness, renal failure, or major amputation which includes most toes, foot, knee, or leg)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score6 MonthsThe CES-D score was compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The CES-D is a self-report questionnaire assessing frequency and severity of depression symptoms. Scores may range from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate worse mood.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test Score6 MonthsScores on the The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test are compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAI state anxiety subtest is a 20-item scale measuring state anxiety. Scores may range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test Score6 MonthsScores on the The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test are compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAI trait anxiety subtest is a 20-item scale measuring state anxiety. Scores may range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.
State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test Score6 MonthsScores on the The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test will be compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAXI anger expression subtest is a 24-item scale measuring how anger is generally being experienced and expressed. Scores may range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating greater anger.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited between March 2007 and November 2009

Pre-assignment details

Eighty-four participants consented to participate in the study. Among these individuals, 10 (11.90%) were not randomized and were excluded from continuing their participation in the study because the medical monitor determined they had a significant psychiatric history, had a history of alcohol or drug abuse, or were not depressed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Psychoeducational Intervention
Participants assigned to this arm represent the experimental group and will receive group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes Psychoeducational intervention: The intervention is group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles developed for women with type 2 diabetes. Specifically, the intervention comprises activities including (1) Education about how dysphoric symptoms (i.e., depressive symptoms, anxiety, and anger) affect glycemic control; (2) Recognition of dysphoric symptoms; and (3) Management of dysphoric symptoms using cognitive-behavioral skills.
38
Usual Medical Care
Participants assigned to this arm represent the control group and will receive usual medical care only.
36
Total74

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up04
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject28

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPsychoeducational InterventionTotalUsual Medical Care
Age, Continuous54.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.8
54.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6
54.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.4
CES-D27.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3
28.3 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
28.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
35 Participants69 Participants34 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants20 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
27 Participants54 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
38 Participants74 Participants36 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
STAI State Anxiety Subtest45.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.8
46.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
47.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.9
STAI Trait Anxiety Subtest51.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.8
51.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4
50.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
STAXI Anger Expression Subtest40.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
37.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8
34.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9
Weight229.1 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 64.4
228.0 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 56.9
226.9 pounds (lbs)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.7
Years Living with Diabetes10.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2
10.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4
10.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 380 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 380 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score

The CES-D score was compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The CES-D is a self-report questionnaire assessing frequency and severity of depression symptoms. Scores may range from 0 to 60, where higher scores indicate worse mood.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: This analysis is restricted to participants who completed the final study visit six months after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Psychoeducational InterventionCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score12.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8
Usual Medical CareCenter for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) Score21.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.2
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in CES-D score between those assigned to the psychoeducational intervention and those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [4.03, 13.76]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test Score

Scores on the The State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test will be compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAXI anger expression subtest is a 24-item scale measuring how anger is generally being experienced and expressed. Scores may range from 0 to 72 with higher scores indicating greater anger.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: This analysis is restricted to participants who completed the final study visit six months after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Psychoeducational InterventionState-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test Score28.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Usual Medical CareState-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI) Anger Expression Sub-test Score29.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the State Trait Anger Expression Sub-test score between those assigned to the psychoeducational intervention and those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization.p-value: 0.8595% CI: [-6.77, 8.24]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test Score

Scores on the The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test are compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAI state anxiety subtest is a 20-item scale measuring state anxiety. Scores may range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: This analysis is restricted to participants who completed the final study visit six months after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Psychoeducational InterventionState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test Score35.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.4
Usual Medical CareState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) State Anxiety Sub-test Score43.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the State Anxiety Sub-test score between those assigned to the psychoeducational intervention and those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization.p-value: 0.0295% CI: [1.29, 14.37]t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test Score

Scores on the The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test are compared between those assigned to intervention versus those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization. The STAI trait anxiety subtest is a 20-item scale measuring state anxiety. Scores may range from 20 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater state anxiety.

Time frame: 6 Months

Population: This analysis is restricted to participants who completed the final study visit six months after randomization.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Psychoeducational InterventionState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test Score36.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Usual Medical CareState-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI Form Y-1) Trait Anxiety Sub-test Score45.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12
Comparison: The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in the State Trait Anxiety Sub-test score between those assigned to the psychoeducational intervention and those assigned to usual medical care six months after randomization.p-value: 0.00595% CI: [2.64, 14.31]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026