Skip to content

Is Electrolyte Maintenance Solution Required in Low-Risk Children With Gastroenteritis?

Is Electrolyte Maintenance Solution Required in Low-Risk Children With Gastroenteritis?

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01185054
Enrollment
624
Registered
2010-08-19
Start date
2010-11-30
Completion date
2015-05-31
Last updated
2018-04-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroenteritis

Keywords

Pediatrics, Gastroenteritis, Oral Rehydration, Electrolyte Maintenance Solution

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to clarify the current standard of care by determining if Electrolyte Maintenance Solution (EMS) is truly the optimal fluid to be used in low-risk children who present to an Emergency Department (ED) with \< 72 hours of vomiting or diarrhea.

Detailed description

Gastroenteritis remains a major cause of morbidity amongst Canadian children. The primary treatment focus revolves around the use of Oral Rehydration Therapy (ORT) to treat dehydration and replace intravascular volume. Since diarrheal disease in Canadian children usually results in mild dehydration and minimal sodium losses, the use of low sodium Electrolyte Maintenance Solutions (EMS) has become the standard of care. However, given that North American children infrequently develop severe dehydration, it is unclear if the routine use of EMS is justified. When pediatricians directly dispense EMS, 16 children need to be treated to prevent 1 unscheduled office visit, however the upper bound of the 95% confidence interval is an astounding 508 patients. In addition, EMS is considered by some to be prohibitively expensive, with 15% of pediatricians believing it to be too expensive for their patients to purchase. An additional 40% report that taste is a major barrier to consumption. As a result, oral fluid replenishment is often underutilized and IV rehydration employed instead. Our goal is to provide evidence to guide the selection of the optimal ORT fluids in low-risk children, thus increasing its use, enhancing its success, and reducing the reliance on intravenous rehydration. We hypothesize that the strict adherence to EMS use in low-risk children may actually be counterproductive by resulting in reduced fluid intake and potentially increasing the use of intravenous rehydration.

Interventions

OTHER½ strength apple juice

For each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another fluid can be used.

For each episode of diarrhea 10 ml/kg of fluid will be given and for each episode of vomiting 2 ml/kg will be given. If the child does not like the solution another electrolyte maintenance fluid can be used. Fluids containing non-physiological concentrations of glucose and electrolytes (carbonated drinks, sweetened fruit juices, water) will be discouraged.

Sponsors

The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Months to 60 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥3 episodes of vomiting or diarrhea in preceding 24 hours * Duration of illness less than 96 hours * Age 6 - 60 months * Clinical suspicion of acute intestinal infectious process * Weight ≥ 8 kg * Clinical dehydration score \< 5 * Capillary refill \< 2 seconds * Absence of bulging fontanelle * Absence of bilious vomiting * Absence of blood in diarrhea/emesis * Absence of abdominal pain (if present reported as periumbilical in location) * Absence of abdominal distention * Absence of acute disease currently requiring treatment * Absence of co-existing diseases (prematurity, cardiac, renal, neurological, metabolic, endocrine, immunodeficiency, trauma or history of ingestion)

Exclusion criteria

* Known gastrointestinal diseases (ie. inflammatory bowel disease, celiac) or any other underlying disease process that might place the child at an increased risk of treatment failure. * Age \< 6 months * Weight \< 8 kg * If premature, corrected gestational age \< 30 weeks * Presence of hematochezia * Responsible physician judges the child requires immediate intravenous rehydration * English language is so limited that consent and/or follow-up is not possible. * Non-Ontario resident \[Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) follow-up data will not be available\]

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of children experiencing a treatment failureWithin 7 days of enrolmentThis outcome will be deemed to have occurred if any of the following occur: * Requires an unscheduled visit after the initial encounter * Requires physician evaluation during a follow-up assessment. * Hospitalization or Intravenous Rehydration * Extended Symptomatology * Failure to consume sufficient study fluid during the initial ED visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Weight Change72-84 hours after enrolment
Proportion of Subjects Receiving Intravenous Rehydration7 days
Proportion of Subjects Requiring Hospitalization7 days
Frequency of diarrhea and vomiting episodes7 days

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026