Skip to content

RCT of Effects of Device-guided Breathing on Ambulatory BP

RCT of Device-guided Breathing Effects on Ambulatory BP

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01184755
Acronym
RESPeRate
Enrollment
253
Registered
2010-08-19
Start date
2008-05-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2017-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

Device-guided breathing, hypertension, behavioral intervention, stress reduction, Heart Rate Variability (HRV) biofeedback

Brief summary

Our aim is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a guided breathing intervention on ambulatory blood pressure (ABP), both systolic and diastolic BP. There are 3 groups: 1) Intervention group instructed to use the RESPeRate device that guides the breath into the 6 breaths/minute range daily for 8 weeks. 2) Relaxation control condition (using a modified device to guide breathing at 13 breaths/minute rate); and 3) Usual Care (UC). After the initial 8 week trial, the main outcome, the intervention group will be randomly assigned to stop using the RESPeRate device or to continue using it for 8 more weeks.

Detailed description

Device-guided breathing is a behavioral intervention that guides the breathing into the 6 per minute range, inducing respiratory sinus arrythmia (RSA), which is the natural cycle of arrythmia that occurs through the influence of breathing on the flow of sympathetic and vagus impulses to the sinoatrial node of the heart. It has been shown in several small trials to have substantial effects on BP reduction, has no known side-effects, and may represent a cost-effective adjunctive treatment for hypertension. an important consideration is that, often, behavioral interventions are given for a brief amount of time, but are expected to have long-term effects. This does not hold true for medication; one would not give anti-hypertensive medication for eight weeks and expect an effect on BP several months later. The development of behavioral interventions needs to take into account methods to sustain long-term effects. Our aim is to conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to test the efficacy of a guided breathing intervention on ambulatory BP (ABP) in hypertensives drawn from primary care and specialty hypertension practices, using a sample size powered to detect effects at 8 weeks and 4-month follow-up. The design calls for two control groups: Usual Care (UC) and a relaxation control condition (using a device that gives the same type of feedback sounds as the guided breathing feedback device, but modified to pace the breathing at approximately 13 breaths per minute, a normal resting rate.) The intervention condition has participants use the RESPeRate device that guides the breath into the 6 breaths/minute range. The initial intervention lasts eight weeks, following which participants are further randomized to either: 1) ending the intervention; of 2) continuing the intervention for the next 8 weeks. The main outcomes are the change at 8 weeks in systolic and diastolic BP (measured by Ambulatory BP monitoring) during the waking hours. Outcomes are measured at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks. The primary outcomes are BP results at 8 weeks, with a 3-group comparison of the intervention group, the relaxation control group and usual care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALRelaxation

Participants are instructed to use the modified device (which paces the breath at a constant 13 breaths/minute) daily for 15 minutes (timing set automatically by device).

DEVICERESPeRate

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Hypertension * Treated with at least one antihypertensive drug * BP still not controlled (\>135/85 on Ambulatory BP waking average)

Exclusion criteria

* Diabetes * Atrial Fibrillation * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)8 weeksThe primary outcome for this study is the change in systolic and diastolic BP measured by Ambulatory BP monitoring at 8-weeks. The measure is the waking mean BP.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Resperate Device Used for 8 Weeks
Participants to use Resperate device to guide breathing for 8 weeks, then not used for next 8 weeks Device-guided breathing: Participants instructed to practice daily for 15 minutes (guided and timed by the device used at home) RESPeRate
126
Relaxation Placebo Device
Participants use modified device to pace breathing in the 13/minute range for daily practice for 8 weeks and no device thereafter Relaxation: Participants are instructed to use the device (which paces the breath at a constant 13 breaths/minute) daily for 15 minutes (timing set automatically by device). Sham RESPeRate
65
Usual Care
Participants continue their usual medication and other management for their hypertension. All participants (including UC) are given a home BP monitor and asked to take their BP in morning and evening 3 days/week.
62
Total253

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRelaxation Placebo DeviceUsual CareResperate Device Used for 8 WeeksTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants11 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
51 Participants51 Participants101 Participants203 Participants
Age, Continuous57.58 years56.34 years56.65 years56.74 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
65 participants62 participants126 participants253 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants34 Participants71 Participants138 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
32 Participants28 Participants55 Participants115 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1260 / 650 / 62
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1260 / 650 / 62

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)

The primary outcome for this study is the change in systolic and diastolic BP measured by Ambulatory BP monitoring at 8-weeks. The measure is the waking mean BP.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: These were patients who completed both the baseline and 8-week Ambulatory BP measures.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Resperate Device Used for 8 WeeksChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Diastolic BP4.0 mm HgStandard Deviation 7
Resperate Device Used for 8 WeeksChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Systolic BP5.8 mm HgStandard Deviation 10.7
Relaxation Placebo DeviceChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Diastolic BP4.7 mm HgStandard Deviation 7.4
Relaxation Placebo DeviceChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Systolic BP6.6 mm HgStandard Deviation 12.3
Usual CareChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Systolic BP1.2 mm HgStandard Deviation 9.9
Usual CareChange in Systolic and Diastolic BP Measured by Ambulatory BP Monitoring (Waking Averages)Change in Diastolic BP0.5 mm HgStandard Deviation 7.1
Comparison: This is the change in Systolic BP at 8 weeksp-value: 0.0195% CI: [-0.987999, -0.134513]Mixed effects regression analysis
Comparison: This is the analysis of change in diastolic BP from Ambulatory BP monitoring.p-value: 0.00695% CI: [-0.667312, -0.115079]mixed effects regression analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026