Skip to content

Phenobarbital for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal

Phenobarbital Versus Placebo for Acute Alcohol Withdrawal

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01184417
Enrollment
102
Registered
2010-08-19
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2012-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Withdrawal

Brief summary

Intravenous phenobarbital in combination with a symptom-guided standardized lorazepam-based alcohol withdrawal protocol will be associated with decreased need for ICU admission, continuous lorazepam infusion and will not be associated with increased adverse events.

Interventions

DRUG10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline

DRUGplacebo

100 m l saline

Sponsors

Alameda County Medical Center
CollaboratorOTHER
Jonathan Rosenson
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Need for admission to hospital for acute alcohol withdrawal

Exclusion criteria

* allergy to phenobarbital, lorazepam, age\<18 or \>65

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion1 yearAll study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or lorazepam drip). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a yes or no variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).
Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission1 yearadmission to intensive care unit
Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission1 yearHow much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 yearDid the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).
Length of Stay1 yearhospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge
Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 yearmortality in study patients
Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 yearThe outome answeres the question Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not. This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.
Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 yearDid the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a bedside sitter to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Phenobarbital Group
10 mg/kg IV phenobarbital in 100 ml saline
51
Placebo Group
100 ml saline
51
Total102

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo GroupPhenobarbital GroupTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
51 Participants51 Participants102 Participants
Age Continuous48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12
47 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants51 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants46 Participants91 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants5 Participants11 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 510 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 510 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion

All study patients are placed on the standardized institutional alcohol withdrawal protocol and receive boluses of lorazepam (1, 2 or 4 mg IV) based on their acute alcohol withdrawal score (AAWS), adminstered serially up to every 15 minutes. Patients who are refractory to the maximum dose of lorazepam allowed by the protocol (up to 4mg lorazepam IV q 15 mins)are placed on a continuous IV lorazepam infusion (or lorazepam drip). Thus, continuous lorazepam infusion is a yes or no variable (i.e. continuous infusion, or not).

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupNumber of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion2 participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Patients Requiring Continuous Lorazepam Infusion16 participants
Primary

Percentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission

admission to intensive care unit

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupPercentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission8 percentage of participants
Placebo GroupPercentage of Patients Requiring ICU Admission25 percentage of participants
95% CI: [4, 32]
Primary

Total Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission

How much total lorazepam did each study patient receive from inital presentation in the Emergency Department through their discharge from the hospital, in milligrams.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Phenobarbital GroupTotal Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission26 milligramsStandard Deviation 45
Placebo GroupTotal Lorazepam Required Per Patient Per Admission49 milligramsStandard Deviation 37
95% CI: [4, 49]
Secondary

Length of Stay

hospital LOS, per patient, in hours from admission to discharge

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Phenobarbital GroupLength of Stay76 hours
Placebo GroupLength of Stay118 hours
95% CI: [-4, 82]
Secondary

Number of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

The outome answeres the question Did the study patient require endotracheal intubation, or not. This outcome investigates if the phenobarbital intervention is associted with increased incidence of respiratory depression and subsequent increased need for intubation.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupNumber of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability0 participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability0 participants
Secondary

Number of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

mortality in study patients

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupNumber of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability0 participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Study Patients With Mortality as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability0 participants
Secondary

Number of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Did the study patient have a witnessed seizure during their hospitaliztion (yes/no).

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupNumber of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability1 participants
Placebo GroupNumber of Study Patients With Seizure as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability2 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Did the study patient require a Licensed Vocational Nurse (LVN) or other hospital staff to serve as a bedside sitter to observe the patient and provide additional safety supervision during any portion of their hospitalization.

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Phenobarbital GroupPercentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability28 percentage of participants
Placebo GroupPercentage of Patients Requiring a Bedside Sitter as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability22 percentage of participants
95% CI: [-11, 23]

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026