Skip to content

Flumazenil for the Treatment of Primary Hypersomnia

A Ten Subject, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Single Day Dosing of Sublingual Flumazenil in Individuals With Primary Hypersomnia or Excessively Long Total Sleep Time and Excess Endogenous Potentiation of GABA-A Receptors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01183312
Enrollment
10
Registered
2010-08-17
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2017-12-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypersomnia, Idiopathic Hypersomnia, Narcolepsy Without Cataplexy, Primary Hypersomnia

Keywords

Hypersomnia, Primary Hypersomnia, Idiopathic Hypersomnia, Narcolepsy without Cataplexy, Flumazenil

Brief summary

The term 'hypersomnia' describes a group of symptoms that includes severe daytime sleepiness and sleeping long periods of time (more than 10 hours per night). Sometimes, hypersomnia is caused by a problem with the quality of sleep occurring at night, for instance when nighttime sleep is disrupted by frequent breathing pauses. In other cases, however, hypersomnia occurs even when nighttime sleep is of good quality. These cases of hypersomnia are presumed to be a symptom of brain dysfunction, and so are referred to as hypersomnias of central (i.e., brain) origin, or primary hypersomnias. The causes of most of these primary hypersomnias are not known. However, our group has recently identified a problem with the major brain chemical responsible for sedation, known as GABA. In a subset of our hypersomnia patients, there is a naturally-occurring substance that causes the GABA receptor to be hyperactive. In essence, it is as though these patients are chronically medicated with Valium (or Xanax or alcohol, all substances that act through the GABA system), even though they do not take these medications. Current treatment of central hypersomnias is limited. For the fraction of cases with narcolepsy, there are FDA-approved, available treatments. However, for the remainder of patients, there are no treatments approved by the FDA. They are usually treated with medications approved for narcolepsy, but sleep experts agree that these medications are often not effective for this group of patients. Based on our understanding of the GABA abnormality in these patients, we evaluated whether flumazenil (an medication approved by the FDA for the treatment of overdose of GABA medications or the reversal of GABA-based anesthesia) would reverse the GABA abnormality in our patients. In a test tube model of this disease, flumazenil does in fact return the function of the GABA system to normal. The investigators have treated a few patients with flumazenil and most have felt that their hypersomnia symptoms improved with this treatment. To determine whether flumazenil is truly beneficial for primary hypersomnia, this study will compare flumazenil to an inactive pill (the placebo). All subjects will receive both flumazenil and the placebo at different times, and their reaction times and symptoms will be compared on these two treatments to determine if one is superior. Currently, flumazenil can only be given through an injection into a vein (i.e., intravenously). This study will evaluate this intravenous dosing as well as a new form of flumazenil, which is taken as a lozenge to be dissolved under the tongue. If this study shows that flumazenil is more effective than placebo in the treatment of hypersomnia, it will identify a potential new therapy for this difficult-to-treat disorder.

Interventions

DRUGFlumazenil

Sublingual flumazenil

Sponsors

Georgia Research Alliance
CollaboratorOTHER
Lynn Marie Trotti
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Hypersomnia (meeting clinical criteria for idiopathic hypersomnia with or without long sleep time, narcolepsy lacking cataplexy, or symptomatic hypersomnia not meeting International Classification of Sleep Disorders 2 (ICSD-2) criteria inclusive of habitually long sleep periods of \> 10 hours/day) * evidence for GABA-related abnormality, as demonstrated by our in-house, in vitro assay * age \> 18 * high performance liquid chromatography/liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry verification of the absence of exogenous benzodiazepines (BZDs).

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to use of flumazenil (pregnancy, hepatic impairment, seizure history, pre-menstrual dysphoric disorder, traumatic brain injury, cardiac disease (left ventricular diastolic dysfunction), or cardiac dysrrhythmia. * Current use of a BZD or BZD-receptor agonists * moderate or severe sleep apnea (RDI \> 15/hr), severe periodic limb movement disorder (PLMI \> 30/hr) * diagnosis of narcolepsy with cataplexy, as determined by ICSD-2 criteria and confirmed by absence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) hypocretin * metabolic disorders such as severe anemia, adrenal insufficiency, severe iron deficiency, vitamin B12 deficiency, or hypothyroidism that may explain symptoms of hypersomnia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Median Reaction Time10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)The PVT measures the reaction time to button press following the presentation of a visual stimulus, reported here as the median reaction time for multiple presentations during the 10 minute task. The measure used was the change in median reaction time from baseline to drug administration, where the median reaction time at each of the time points (below) was averaged to provide a single on-treatment value for median reaction time. The measure was then calculated as baseline value - treatment value, such that higher numbers denote improvement from baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
PVT Additional Measure #2, Change in Duration of Lapse Domain10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)The PVT duration of lapse domain is defined as the reciprocal of the reaction time averaged across the slowest 10% of responses. The measure used was the change in duration of lapse domain from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where lower numbers denote improvement from baseline).
PVT Additional Measure #3, Change in Optimum Response Times10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)The optimum response times is defined as the reciprocal of the reaction time averaged across the fastest 10% of responses. The measure used was the change in optimum response time from baseline to following drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where lower numbers denote improvement from baseline).
PVT Additional Measure #4, Change in False Response Frequency10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)The false response frequency is defined as the number of button presses when no stimulus is presented. The measure used was the change in false response frequency from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).
PVT Additional Measure #1, Change in Lapse Frequency10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)A PVT lapse is defined as a reaction time exceeding 500 msec following the presentation of a single stimulus, which are then summed for the entire 10 minute PVT testing period. The measure used was the change in the frequency of lapses from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).
Change in Stanford Sleepiness Scale10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)The Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) is a subjective rating of sleepiness, with score ranging from 1 to 7, where higher values reflect more severe sleepiness. The measure used was change in SSS from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).
Electroencephalogram (EEG) Powerfollowing drug administrationEEG signals reflect the state of excitability of the cerebral cortex and correlate highly with levels of behavioral arousal. This is quantifiable as 'power' of the signal (microvolts squared/signal frequency). The EEG signals will be acquired and stored for off-line power analysis and comparison between treatment conditions.
PVT Additional Measure #5, Change in Visual Analog Scale Rating of Sleepiness at the Completion of PVT10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)At the end of the 10 minute PVT testing period, subjects were asked to rate their current level of sleepiness along a line, which was transformed into a numeric value from 1-10, such that high levels indicated more severe subjective sleepiness. The measure used was the change in this rating from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were recruited from the Sleep Center of the Emory Clinic, in Atlanta, Georgia, USA, between December 2010 and October 2011.

Pre-assignment details

12 patients were enrolled; of these, 2 were excluded prior to randomization because screening laboratory test results were abnormal.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo First, Then Flumazenil
Placebo during the first intervention day and sublingual flumazenil during the second intervention day (after washout period).
5
Flumazenil First, Then Placebo
Sublingual flumazenil during the first intervention day and placebo during the second intervention day (after washout period).
5
Total10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFlumazenil First, Then PlaceboPlacebo First, Then FlumazenilTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Age, Continuous41.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.1
33.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
37.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
5 participants5 participants10 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
5 Participants5 Participants10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 109 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Median Reaction Time

The PVT measures the reaction time to button press following the presentation of a visual stimulus, reported here as the median reaction time for multiple presentations during the 10 minute task. The measure used was the change in median reaction time from baseline to drug administration, where the median reaction time at each of the time points (below) was averaged to provide a single on-treatment value for median reaction time. The measure was then calculated as baseline value - treatment value, such that higher numbers denote improvement from baseline.

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Median Reaction Time-9.86 msecStandard Deviation 28.2
Sublingual FlumazenilChange in Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT) Median Reaction Time-4.46 msecStandard Deviation 63.7
p-value: 0.77wilcoxon signed rank (paired)
Secondary

Change in Stanford Sleepiness Scale

The Stanford Sleepiness Scale (SSS) is a subjective rating of sleepiness, with score ranging from 1 to 7, where higher values reflect more severe sleepiness. The measure used was change in SSS from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange in Stanford Sleepiness Scale0.84 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.68
Sublingual FlumazenilChange in Stanford Sleepiness Scale0.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.36
p-value: 0.13Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)
Secondary

Electroencephalogram (EEG) Power

EEG signals reflect the state of excitability of the cerebral cortex and correlate highly with levels of behavioral arousal. This is quantifiable as 'power' of the signal (microvolts squared/signal frequency). The EEG signals will be acquired and stored for off-line power analysis and comparison between treatment conditions.

Time frame: following drug administration

Population: EEG signal processing analyses have not been performed. This would require an additional set of extensive analyses, very distinct from the statistics performed for the other study outcomes. EEG data were collected for possible future analyses, pending resources and expertise, and as such we have no data to report here.

Secondary

PVT Additional Measure #1, Change in Lapse Frequency

A PVT lapse is defined as a reaction time exceeding 500 msec following the presentation of a single stimulus, which are then summed for the entire 10 minute PVT testing period. The measure used was the change in the frequency of lapses from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPVT Additional Measure #1, Change in Lapse Frequency-3.3 number of lapses during PVT testingStandard Deviation 6.9
Sublingual FlumazenilPVT Additional Measure #1, Change in Lapse Frequency-2.6 number of lapses during PVT testingStandard Deviation 8.7
p-value: 0.51Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)
Secondary

PVT Additional Measure #2, Change in Duration of Lapse Domain

The PVT duration of lapse domain is defined as the reciprocal of the reaction time averaged across the slowest 10% of responses. The measure used was the change in duration of lapse domain from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where lower numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPVT Additional Measure #2, Change in Duration of Lapse Domain0.18 1/msecStandard Deviation 0.3
Sublingual FlumazenilPVT Additional Measure #2, Change in Duration of Lapse Domain0.25 1/msecStandard Deviation 0.45
p-value: 0.32Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)
Secondary

PVT Additional Measure #3, Change in Optimum Response Times

The optimum response times is defined as the reciprocal of the reaction time averaged across the fastest 10% of responses. The measure used was the change in optimum response time from baseline to following drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where lower numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPVT Additional Measure #3, Change in Optimum Response Times-0.02 1/msecStandard Deviation 0.27
Sublingual FlumazenilPVT Additional Measure #3, Change in Optimum Response Times-0.04 1/msecStandard Deviation 0.63
p-value: 0.56Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)
Secondary

PVT Additional Measure #4, Change in False Response Frequency

The false response frequency is defined as the number of button presses when no stimulus is presented. The measure used was the change in false response frequency from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPVT Additional Measure #4, Change in False Response Frequency0.09 number of false startsStandard Deviation 0.56
Sublingual FlumazenilPVT Additional Measure #4, Change in False Response Frequency-0.38 number of false startsStandard Deviation 0.45
p-value: 0.14Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)
Secondary

PVT Additional Measure #5, Change in Visual Analog Scale Rating of Sleepiness at the Completion of PVT

At the end of the 10 minute PVT testing period, subjects were asked to rate their current level of sleepiness along a line, which was transformed into a numeric value from 1-10, such that high levels indicated more severe subjective sleepiness. The measure used was the change in this rating from baseline to drug administration (calculated as baseline value - average value with study drug, where higher numbers denote improvement from baseline).

Time frame: 10, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 minutes after drug administration (averaged for all time points for each subject)

Population: Intention to treat (all randomized subjects were included)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPVT Additional Measure #5, Change in Visual Analog Scale Rating of Sleepiness at the Completion of PVT1.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.49
Sublingual FlumazenilPVT Additional Measure #5, Change in Visual Analog Scale Rating of Sleepiness at the Completion of PVT1.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
p-value: 0.89Wilcoxon Signed Rank (paired)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026