Skip to content

Distal Locking Using an Electromagnetic Field Guided Computer Based Real Time System for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

Distal Locking Using an Electromagnetic Field Guided Computer Based Real Time System for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01183078
Acronym
Sure Shot
Enrollment
55
Registered
2010-08-17
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2023-05-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Fractures, Tibial Fractures

Keywords

efficacy, drill placement, nail placement, radiation, Operative time, Reduction in exposure to radiation, Accuracy for nail placement

Brief summary

Hypothesis: Utilization of the wand method will enhance improvements in drill placement, locking nail placement during tibia and femur fracture repairs, and offer less radiation exposure and less operative time. The purpose of this research study is to compare the efficacy of distal locking of intramedullary nails using a standard free-hand technique with the guided wand technique. Distal locking is the placement of screws through the intramedullary rod to hold it in place and prevent rotation. Currently, the free-hand technique is most often utilized. With this technique, the surgeon uses intraoperative x-rays in order to find the holes in the intramedullary rod to place the screws. The wand technique uses electromagnetic fields rather than x-rays to find these screw holes. The utilization of the wand technique could result in improvements in drill placement and locking nail placement as well as decrease operative time and radiation exposure.

Detailed description

Methods and Measures Patients 18 years of age and older presenting through the emergency room at Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center with tibial and femoral fractures suitable for operative repair will be prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria will include any patient with a tibia fracture or femur fracture requiring intramedullary nailing. Retrograde intramedullary nails will be excluded as will nails which are not interlocked. The goal for enrollment is 24 tibial and 24 femoral fractures. Data including operative time, C-arm time, and nail misses will be obtained in the operating room for 24 tibial and 24 femoral nails. Surgeons who perform the procedure will have had experience using the freehand technique and will be trained with the guided wand prior to the experiment. Locking will be performed with the freehand and the wand technique in alternating order for the two interlocking screws. The order of which technique is utilized first will be randomly assigned. All procedures will be timed, and fluoroscopy time, radiation time, and any nail misses will be documented. All tibial nails will be locked with 2 mediolateral screws and all femurs with 2 lateral to medial screws. Patients will receive follow-up for complications for a 6 month period after surgical procedure. Intervals of follow-up will be at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months. Anterior-posterior and lateral images will be performed as are already customary and usual at these time intervals. Outcome Measure(s) The goal is to prospectively assess the wand technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement which reduced operative time, C-arm exposure and inadvertent nail misses. Additionally, it is expected that there will exist no complications related to the use of this technique.

Interventions

PROCEDUREfree-hand

Free-hand technique utilizes x-rays to find screw holes.

PROCEDUREWand technique

Wand technique is utilized to find screw holes.

Sponsors

Smith & Nephew, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years and older with tibial or femoral fracture suitable for operative repair with intramedullary nailing.

Exclusion criteria

* Fractures requiring repair by retrograde intramedullary nails and interlocking nails.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reduced operative time.Six months post surgeryThe goal is to prospectively assess the wand technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement which reduces operative time.
Reduced C-arm exposureSix months post surgeryThe goal is to prospectively assess the wand technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement, which reduces C-arm exposure.
Reduces inadvertent nail misses.Six months post surgeryThe goal is to prospectively assess the wand technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement, which reduces inadvertent nail misses.
No complicationsSix months post surgeryThe goal is to prospectively assess the wand technique as a reliable alternative to standard interlocking screw placement. It is expected that there will exist no complications related to the use of this technique.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026