Skip to content

Trial of Proton Versus Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in Patients With Chordoma of the Skull Base

Randomised Trial of Proton vs. Carbon Ion Radiation Therapy in Patients With Chordoma of the Skull Base -Clinical Phase III Study-

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01182779
Acronym
HIT-1
Enrollment
319
Registered
2010-08-17
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2023-08-31
Last updated
2010-08-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chordoma, Tumor, Treatment

Keywords

base of skull chordoma, radiation, carbon ions, protons

Brief summary

This study is a prospective randomised clinical phase III trial. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate, if the innovative therapy (carbon ion irradiation) in chordomas is superior to the standard proton treatment with respect to the local-progression free survival (LPFS).

Detailed description

The study is a prospective randomised clinical phase III trial. The trial will be carried out at Heidelberger Ionenstrahl-Therapie (HIT) centre as monocentric trial. Proton therapy is the gold standard in the treatment of skull base chordomas. However, high-LET beams such as carbon ions theoretically offer biologic advantages by enhanced biologic effectiveness in slow-growing tumors. Up until now it was impossible to compare two different particle therapies, i.e. proton and carbon ion therapy directly with each other. The aim of this study is to find out, whether the biological advantages of carbon ion therapy mentioned above can also be clinically confirmed. Patients with skull base chordoma will be randomised to either proton or carbon ion radiation therapy. As a standard, patients will undergo non-invasive, rigid immobilization and target volume delineation will be carried out based on CT and MRI data. The biologically isoeffective target dose to the PTV in carbon ion treatment (accelerated dose) will be 63 Gy E ± 5% and 72 Gy E ± 5% (standard dose) in proton therapy respectively. Local-progression free survival (LPFS) will be analysed as primary end point. Toxicity and survival are the secondary end points. Also matters of interest are patterns of recurrence, prognostic factors and plan quality.

Interventions

RADIATIONCarbon ion

Arm A (carbon ion therapy): Total dose to the PTV2 - 45 Gy E in 3 Gy E /d, 4-6 days a week, 15 fractions Total dose to the PTV1 - 63 Gy E ± 5%, further 5-7 fractions a 3 Gy E.

RADIATIONProtons

Arm B (proton therapy): Total dose to the PTV2 - 50 to 56 Gy E in 2 Gy E /d, 4-6 days a week, 28 fractions Total dose to the PTV1 - 72 Gy E ± 5%, further 6-9 fractions a 2 Gy E.

Sponsors

Heidelberg University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Karnofsky Performance Score ≥60% * Age \>18 years and \<80 years * Informed consent signed by the patient * Histological confirmation of chordoma with infiltration of the skull base.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to understand the aims of the study, no informed consent * Prior RT of skull base region * Other malignancies with disease-free interval \< 5 years (excepting pre- cancerous lesions) * Participation in another trial * Pregnancy * Simultaneous CHT or Immunotherapy.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
local-progression free survival (LPFS)8-yearsThe primary objective of this study is to evaluate, if the innovative therapy (carbon ion irradiation) in chordomas is superior to the standard proton treatment with respect to the LPFS defined as time from the randomisation to observed local reccurrence or death from any cause in the absence of documented local disease progression. Lo-cal recurrence defined as MRT or CT - morphological tumor progress in the former irradiated region. A 10% increase in the LPFS is considered clinically relevant as-suming that the LPFS rate for the proton therapy is 70%.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Survival8-yearsAssessment of overall survival, progression free and metastasis free survival.
Local control and patterns of recurrence8 yearsLocal recurrences will be confirmed radiologically and histologically whenever possible. At least two medical doctors (radiation oncologist and/or radiologist) will be required to judge of the recurrence.
Toxicity8 yearsAcute and late toxicity will be analysed due to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: CTCAE V4.0 for acute reaction and RTOG/EORTC for late effects.

Countries

Germany

Contacts

Primary ContactAnna V. Nikoghosyan, MD
anna.nikoghosyan@med.uni-heidelberg.de+496221568202
Backup ContactJuergen Debus, MD, PhD
juergen.debus@med.uni-heidelberg.de+496221568202

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 30, 2026