Skip to content

Evaluation of Participant Responses to Educational Counseling About Different Combined Hormonal Contraceptive Choices (P06557)

Observational, Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Educational Counseling Effects in the Choice of Different Combined Hormonal Contraceptives

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01181778
Acronym
ECOS
Enrollment
1919
Registered
2010-08-13
Start date
2010-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2022-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Contraception

Keywords

hormonal contraceptive methods, combined hormonal contraceptive methods, physician counseling

Brief summary

Physicians counsel women participants who are candidates for hormonal contraception about available combined hormonal contraceptive methods (the combined pill, the contraceptive vaginal ring \[i.e., the etonogestrel + ethinylestradiol vaginal ring\] and the contraceptive transdermal patch). Effects of this counseling on women's contraceptive use decisions are to be evaluated by 1) recording which method is chosen after information is provided about all three available combined hormonal methods, 2) comparing the final chosen contraceptive method used by a participant after counseling with the method originally intended to be used by that participant before the counseling, and 3) evaluating the criteria used by women participants to choose their contraceptive method after the counseling, including evaluation of social and demographic predictors of contraceptive choice. The differences among participants in the number of contacts made by the participants to physician offices for purposes of obtaining information regarding the use of their final chosen hormonal contraceptive (e.g., requests for clarification, questions, expressing doubt or reservations for using the method, or requests for other help/advisement by the physician) will also be evaluated over four months following the physician counseling.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy women ≥ 18 years of age and ≤ 40 years of age who consult their physician for contraception and would consider a combined hormonal contraceptive method * Women who are using the hormonal method for the first time or who have previously used and suspended it for at least 1 month * Women on one combined pill who would consider switching to another combined pill (Women who attend their physician to stop one of the combined hormonal methods can not participate) * Women who request a combined hormonal contraceptive method but for whom the physician considers another method more appropriate (e.g. contraindications for combined hormonal contraception) will be counseled about these methods but still complete the questionnaire * Women who are not interested in becoming pregnant in the next 4 months * Women who agree to complete a questionnaire and that the questionnaire data are reviewed and analyzed by staff participating in the project

Exclusion criteria

None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingDay of inclusion (Day 0) prior to physician counseling and after physician counselingBefore receiving counseling, participants recorded on a questionnaire the method of contraception they thought they would choose. This was to be compared with the method of contraception the same participants thought they would choose after they received physician counseling, which was also recorded on their questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodUp to four months after the counseling visitParticipant contacts with physician offices were collected, and the number of callbacks by method of contraception recorded. Participants who called back more than once were counted overall and for each method of contraception.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants who were enrolled in the study
1,919
Total1,919

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyPhysician Decision48

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Continuous26.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1919 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1,871
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1,871

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After Counseling

Before receiving counseling, participants recorded on a questionnaire the method of contraception they thought they would choose. This was to be compared with the method of contraception the same participants thought they would choose after they received physician counseling, which was also recorded on their questionnaire.

Time frame: Day of inclusion (Day 0) prior to physician counseling and after physician counseling

Population: The analysis population consisted of all participants who completed questionnaires before and after physician counseling and had no medical reason to prevent them from using a combined hormonal contraception method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingDaily Pill1207 Participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingUndecided336 Participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingWeekly Patch60 Participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingOther Method171 Participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingMonthy Ring97 Participants
All Qualified Participants After CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingOther Method104 Participants
All Qualified Participants After CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingMonthy Ring397 Participants
All Qualified Participants After CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingUndecided40 Participants
All Qualified Participants After CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingDaily Pill1199 Participants
All Qualified Participants After CounselingNumber of Participants Choosing Each Hormonal Contraceptive Method Before and After CounselingWeekly Patch131 Participants
Comparison: Analysis of the difference in the percentage of participants who chose the Daily Pill before physician counseling and after physician counseling.p-value: 0.70595% CI: [-2.6, 1.8]Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of the difference in the percentage of participants who chose the Weekly Patch before physician counseling and after physician counseling.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [2.6, 5]Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of the difference in the percentage of participants who chose the Monthly Ring before physician counseling and after physician counseling.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.3, 17.8]Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of the difference in the percentage of participants who chose Other Method before physician counseling and after physician counseling.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-5, -2.2]Chi-squared
Comparison: Analysis of the difference in the percentage of participants who chose Undecided before physician counseling and after physician counseling.p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-17.6, -14.1]Chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive Method

Participant contacts with physician offices were collected, and the number of callbacks by method of contraception recorded. Participants who called back more than once were counted overall and for each method of contraception.

Time frame: Up to four months after the counseling visit

Population: The analysis population consisted of all participants who completed questionnaires before and after physician counseling and had no medical reason to prevent them from using a combined hormonal contraception method.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingPercentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodDaily Pill (n=1199)5.1 percentage of participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingPercentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodOther Method (n=104)1.9 percentage of participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingPercentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodUndecided (n=40)2.5 percentage of participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingPercentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodWeekly Patch (n=131)6.9 percentage of participants
All Qualified Participants Before CounselingPercentage of Participants With Post-counseling Contacts With Physician Offices, by Hormonal Contraceptive MethodMonthly Ring (n=397)6.0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026