Effect of Individualized Nutrition on Quality of Life
Conditions
Keywords
Stem cell transplantation, Individualized Nutrition, Quality of life, Oral Mucositis, Adult
Brief summary
Aim Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) combined with several cycles of intensive chemotherapy is the only curative treatment for several malignant blood diseases. Most allo-SCT patients who are treated with intensive chemotherapy often have reduced nutritional status. Several studies have evaluated the effect of different nutrition intervention for allo-SCT patients, but there have not been found evidence-based recommendations for energy requirements, use of enteral nutrition (EN) and/or parenteral nutrition (PN). We are not aware of studies using QoL as end-point among allo-SCT patients allocated to specific nutrition intervention. Main hypothesis: Patients who receive individualized nutrition have better global QoL assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-HDC29 tool three months after SCT Sub-hypotheses: Patients who receive individualized nutrition have: i) less often oral mucositis grade 3-4. ii) better nutrition status iii) decreased length of hospital stay, less episodes with fever, earlier engraftment and less often acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade 3-4, and iv) better main QoL scores on the scale for physical and social functions, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea three months after allogeneic SCT, compared to the control group. Patients and methods A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned to the intervention- or control group. The patients in the intervention group will receive a therapeutic diet in combination with tube feeding with an additional PN if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. The patients in the control group will receive nutrition support after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route.
Detailed description
Patients and methods A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. This is the result of a power calculation where a difference of 15 of global QoL is the primary end-point. All patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria and are offered allo-SCT with myeloablative condition are invited to participate in the study about 1-3 months before commencing the treatment. The patients have to give their written informed consent to participate in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned in blocks to the intervention- or control group. The main end-point is three months after SCT. We will follow the patients throughout the first year after SCT. Nutrition intervention The interventions start when the patients are arriving at the hospital for SCT and consist of individualized nutrition supplement for each patient until discharge. The severity of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mouth soreness will be a measure of the administration route of nutrition (oral, PN and/or EN). The energy requirements will be calculated and the intake monitored. The energy intake will continuously be adjusted to the energy requirements. The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue, and an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. Dislodged tubes will promptly be replaced until two times in the stomach. If the tube dislodge for more than two times, or voluminous diarrhea appears, or the patients refuse the tube, the patients will be nourished by the PN route only. The patients in the intervention group will receive dietary recommendation before leaving the hospital. The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route. Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given. Measurement of quality of life, mucositis and nutrition status The patients score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 form at admission, i.e. 8 days prior to SCT, then after 3 and 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. At the same time we will measure the following several markers of nutritional status and parameters of hemostasis. We will also record routine clinical parameters as well as anthropometry and body composition using electrical bioimpedance. WHO Oral Toxicity Grading Scale will be used to measure oral mucositis. In addition we will use the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).
Interventions
The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue. EN with an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* acute lymphatic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myeloproliferative disease and chronic myelogenous leukaemia and other disorders accepted for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, following myeloablative conditioning
Exclusion criteria
* unable to give informed consent * unable to adhere to protocol due to reasons unrelated to the hematological condition
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Global Quality of Life Score | 3 month after transplantation | A score for measurement of global quality of life will be obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, form EORTC QLQ-C30. The scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores mean better outcome. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Episodes With Fever | Up to 8 months | Fever episodes |
| Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment. | Up to 1 months | Engraftment was judged by the number of days to neutrophils ≥0.2 × 109/l. |
| Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4 | Up to 3 months | — |
| Number of Underweight Participants | 3 month after transplantation | Nutritional status will be assessed with anthropometry, biomarkers and bioimpedance. Here the number of underweight participants is reported. |
| Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30 | 3 months after transplantation | These scores (range 0-100) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 form. Higher scores means more pain. |
| Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4 | Up to 3 months | Oral mucositis will be graded according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Grading Scale, range 0-4 in scores, higher scores mean worse outcome. |
| Number of Participants With Hospital Stay | Up to 8 months | — |
Countries
Norway, Russia
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
As determined
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition Individualized Nutrition: The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue. EN with an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. | 59 |
| Control Group The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route. Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given. | 60 |
| Total | 119 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control Group | Total | Individualized Nutrition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41 years | 42 years | 45 years |
| Race and Ethnicity Not Collected | — | 0 Participants | — |
| Region of Enrollment Norway | 60 participants | 119 participants | 59 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 25 Participants | 45 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants | 74 Participants | 39 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 9 / 59 | 5 / 60 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 59 | 0 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 59 | 0 / 60 |
Outcome results
Global Quality of Life Score
A score for measurement of global quality of life will be obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, form EORTC QLQ-C30. The scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores mean better outcome.
Time frame: 3 month after transplantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Global Quality of Life Score | 58.8 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.2 |
| Control Group | Global Quality of Life Score | 55.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 23.3 |
Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.
Engraftment was judged by the number of days to neutrophils ≥0.2 × 109/l.
Time frame: Up to 1 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment. | 15 days |
| Control Group | Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment. | 16 days |
Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4
Time frame: Up to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4 | 7 Participants |
| Control Group | Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4 | 13 Participants |
Number of Episodes With Fever
Fever episodes
Time frame: Up to 8 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Number of Episodes With Fever | 55 Fever episodes |
| Control Group | Number of Episodes With Fever | 59 Fever episodes |
Number of Participants With Hospital Stay
Time frame: Up to 8 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Number of Participants With Hospital Stay | 37 Participants |
| Control Group | Number of Participants With Hospital Stay | 39 Participants |
Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4
Oral mucositis will be graded according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Grading Scale, range 0-4 in scores, higher scores mean worse outcome.
Time frame: Up to 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4 | 42 participants |
| Control Group | Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4 | 45 participants |
Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30
These scores (range 0-100) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 form. Higher scores means more pain.
Time frame: 3 months after transplantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30 | 40 Participants |
| Control Group | Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30 | 48 Participants |
Number of Underweight Participants
Nutritional status will be assessed with anthropometry, biomarkers and bioimpedance. Here the number of underweight participants is reported.
Time frame: 3 month after transplantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Individualized Nutrition | Number of Underweight Participants | 2 Participants |
| Control Group | Number of Underweight Participants | 4 Participants |