Skip to content

Individualized Nutrition for Adult Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants - Effect on Quality of Life

Individualized Nutrition for Adult Recipients of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplants - Effect on Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01181076
Acronym
NASQ
Enrollment
119
Registered
2010-08-13
Start date
2010-08-10
Completion date
2017-03-01
Last updated
2020-01-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effect of Individualized Nutrition on Quality of Life

Keywords

Stem cell transplantation, Individualized Nutrition, Quality of life, Oral Mucositis, Adult

Brief summary

Aim Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) combined with several cycles of intensive chemotherapy is the only curative treatment for several malignant blood diseases. Most allo-SCT patients who are treated with intensive chemotherapy often have reduced nutritional status. Several studies have evaluated the effect of different nutrition intervention for allo-SCT patients, but there have not been found evidence-based recommendations for energy requirements, use of enteral nutrition (EN) and/or parenteral nutrition (PN). We are not aware of studies using QoL as end-point among allo-SCT patients allocated to specific nutrition intervention. Main hypothesis: Patients who receive individualized nutrition have better global QoL assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment in Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-HDC29 tool three months after SCT Sub-hypotheses: Patients who receive individualized nutrition have: i) less often oral mucositis grade 3-4. ii) better nutrition status iii) decreased length of hospital stay, less episodes with fever, earlier engraftment and less often acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) grade 3-4, and iv) better main QoL scores on the scale for physical and social functions, fatigue, loss of appetite, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea three months after allogeneic SCT, compared to the control group. Patients and methods A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned to the intervention- or control group. The patients in the intervention group will receive a therapeutic diet in combination with tube feeding with an additional PN if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. The patients in the control group will receive nutrition support after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route.

Detailed description

Patients and methods A minimum sample of 100 patients will be included in the study. This is the result of a power calculation where a difference of 15 of global QoL is the primary end-point. All patients who fulfil the inclusion criteria and are offered allo-SCT with myeloablative condition are invited to participate in the study about 1-3 months before commencing the treatment. The patients have to give their written informed consent to participate in the study. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly assigned in blocks to the intervention- or control group. The main end-point is three months after SCT. We will follow the patients throughout the first year after SCT. Nutrition intervention The interventions start when the patients are arriving at the hospital for SCT and consist of individualized nutrition supplement for each patient until discharge. The severity of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea and mouth soreness will be a measure of the administration route of nutrition (oral, PN and/or EN). The energy requirements will be calculated and the intake monitored. The energy intake will continuously be adjusted to the energy requirements. The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue, and an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values. Dislodged tubes will promptly be replaced until two times in the stomach. If the tube dislodge for more than two times, or voluminous diarrhea appears, or the patients refuse the tube, the patients will be nourished by the PN route only. The patients in the intervention group will receive dietary recommendation before leaving the hospital. The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route. Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given. Measurement of quality of life, mucositis and nutrition status The patients score on the EORTC QLQ-C30 form at admission, i.e. 8 days prior to SCT, then after 3 and 6 weeks and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. At the same time we will measure the following several markers of nutritional status and parameters of hemostasis. We will also record routine clinical parameters as well as anthropometry and body composition using electrical bioimpedance. WHO Oral Toxicity Grading Scale will be used to measure oral mucositis. In addition we will use the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA).

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTIndividualized Nutrition

The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue. EN with an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values.

Sponsors

St. Petersburg State Pavlov Medical University
CollaboratorOTHER
Oslo University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* acute lymphatic leukaemia, acute myeloid leukaemia, chronic myeloproliferative disease and chronic myelogenous leukaemia and other disorders accepted for allogeneic stem cell transplantation, following myeloablative conditioning

Exclusion criteria

* unable to give informed consent * unable to adhere to protocol due to reasons unrelated to the hematological condition

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Global Quality of Life Score3 month after transplantationA score for measurement of global quality of life will be obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, form EORTC QLQ-C30. The scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores mean better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Episodes With FeverUp to 8 monthsFever episodes
Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.Up to 1 monthsEngraftment was judged by the number of days to neutrophils ≥0.2 × 109/l.
Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4Up to 3 months
Number of Underweight Participants3 month after transplantationNutritional status will be assessed with anthropometry, biomarkers and bioimpedance. Here the number of underweight participants is reported.
Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C303 months after transplantationThese scores (range 0-100) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 form. Higher scores means more pain.
Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4Up to 3 monthsOral mucositis will be graded according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Grading Scale, range 0-4 in scores, higher scores mean worse outcome.
Number of Participants With Hospital StayUp to 8 months

Countries

Norway, Russia

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

As determined

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Individualized Nutrition
Individualized Nutrition: The patients who are able to achieve oral nutrition requirement will receive a therapeutic diet using regular foods, which is lactose-reduced and energy-enriched. The naso-jejunal tube will be inserted during the first five days after transplantation. EN will be given when oral intake discontinue. EN with an additional PN will be given if the estimated requirements by the enteral route is lower than reference values.
59
Control Group
The patients in the control group will be nourished after established routine, first by the oral route, later by the PN route. Naso-jejunal tube will not be inserted and enteral nutrition will not be given.
60
Total119

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControl GroupTotalIndividualized Nutrition
Age, Continuous41 years42 years45 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
60 participants119 participants59 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants45 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
35 Participants74 Participants39 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
9 / 595 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 590 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 590 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Global Quality of Life Score

A score for measurement of global quality of life will be obtained from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, form EORTC QLQ-C30. The scores range from 0 to 100, higher scores mean better outcome.

Time frame: 3 month after transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Individualized NutritionGlobal Quality of Life Score58.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.2
Control GroupGlobal Quality of Life Score55.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.3
Secondary

Duration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.

Engraftment was judged by the number of days to neutrophils ≥0.2 × 109/l.

Time frame: Up to 1 months

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Individualized NutritionDuration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.15 days
Control GroupDuration Between Stem Cell Transplantation and Day of Engraftment.16 days
Secondary

Frequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-4

Time frame: Up to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individualized NutritionFrequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-47 Participants
Control GroupFrequency of Acute Graft Versus Host Disease Grade 3-413 Participants
Secondary

Number of Episodes With Fever

Fever episodes

Time frame: Up to 8 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Individualized NutritionNumber of Episodes With Fever55 Fever episodes
Control GroupNumber of Episodes With Fever59 Fever episodes
Secondary

Number of Participants With Hospital Stay

Time frame: Up to 8 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individualized NutritionNumber of Participants With Hospital Stay37 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants With Hospital Stay39 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-4

Oral mucositis will be graded according to the World Health Organization Oral Toxicity Grading Scale, range 0-4 in scores, higher scores mean worse outcome.

Time frame: Up to 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Individualized NutritionNumber of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-442 participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants With Oral Mucositis Grade 3-445 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C30

These scores (range 0-100) will be assessed with the EORTC QLQ C30 form. Higher scores means more pain.

Time frame: 3 months after transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individualized NutritionNumber of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C3040 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Participants With Pain, as Determined by EORTC QLQ C3048 Participants
Secondary

Number of Underweight Participants

Nutritional status will be assessed with anthropometry, biomarkers and bioimpedance. Here the number of underweight participants is reported.

Time frame: 3 month after transplantation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Individualized NutritionNumber of Underweight Participants2 Participants
Control GroupNumber of Underweight Participants4 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026