Bipolar H.A Versus Trochanteric Antegrade Nail for Treatment of Displaced Subcapital Femoral Fractures

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Unknown

Study type

Observational

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT01181037

Enrollment

200

Registered

2010-08-13

Start date

2010-06-30

Completion date

2012-04-30

Last updated

2012-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Displaced Subcapital Femoral Fracture

Keywords

Displaced subcapital femoral fracture, Bbipolar H.A., CRIF with Ttrochanteric Antegrade Nail

Brief summary

A retrospective study to compare clinical results of patients that were treated by Bipolar H.A. vs. closed reduction and internal fixation with Trochanteric Antegrade Nail for displaced femoral subcapital fracture.

Interventions

None listed

Study design

Observational model

CASE_CONTROL

Time perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

40 Years to 85 Years

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* Displaced femoral subcapital fracture. * Active patient. * Age 40-85. * Patient was treated by one of the two methods.

Exclusion criteria

* Age out of range.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
describe treatment of patients that were treated by Bipolar H.A. vs. closed reduction and internal fixation	6month to 3 years following operation	A retrospective study will defer between groups

Countries

Israel

Contacts

Primary Contactyaron brin, MD

yaronbrin@gmail.com0545784734

Outcome results