Skip to content

Comparison Study of Narrow Band Imaging Versus White Light Resection in Patients With Bladder Tumors/Cancer

A Multi-center, International Study to Compare Use of Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Versus White Light(WL) During Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumors (TURB) to Asses Recurrence of Bladder Cancer in Terms of Safety and Efficacy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01180478
Enrollment
965
Registered
2010-08-12
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2013-11-30
Last updated
2018-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Keywords

Bladder Cancer, Urothelial carcinoma, Stage pTa or pT1, NMIBC Ta/T1, Narrow Band Imaging, White Light Cystoscopy, Transurethral resection, Superficial bladder tumor, Positive urine cytology

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the recurrence rate at 1 year following Narrow Band Imaging and trans-urethral resection of bladder tumor with White Light and TURB in patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

Detailed description

Currently bladder tumors are diagnosed visually with standard cystoscopy that uses white light, or light that is generated encompassing the entire visual spectrum. Some tumors such as carcinoma in situ may not be visible using white light and require patients to undergo random bladder biopsies in order to find the cancer. Recently the development of photodynamic agents have been shown to enhance these procedures to accomplish better resection and identify over-looked tumors. However, these methods often require the instillation of dyes into the bladder as well as specialized cystoscopes. Narrow band imaging (NBI) is now available which uses a special filter to limit the light to only certain wavelengths which allows the identification of areas of increased vascularity or abnormalities without the need for dyes. NBI has been investigated in gastro-intestinal disease and found to be beneficial. Early reports in urology suggest that this technology may reduce the number of tumors that are missed which could impact the recurrence rate of bladder tumors, but this is not known at this time.

Interventions

White Light Cystoscopy

Narrow Band Imaging

Sponsors

Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients scheduled for treatment of primary or recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer * Patients greater than 18 years of age * No tumors in the upper tract (kidneys or ureters) * No previous pelvic radiation

Exclusion criteria

* Gross hematuria at the time of resection making visualization with NBI not possible * Participation in other clinical studies with investigations drugs concurrently or within 30 days. * Pregnancy * Conditions associated with a risk of poor compliance or unwilling to follow up

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer.1 year after treatmentThe primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection3 months after treatment
Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.30 daysGrade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade III-a Intervention not under general anaesthesia Grade III-b Intervention under general anaesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: brain haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischaemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IV-a Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IV-b Multi-organ dysfunction Grade V Death of a patient
Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.peri-operativeWe looked at different perioperative complications in order to discover peri-operative morbidity after instrumental treatment. The following variables were analyzed: Bleeding, Fever, UTI, Bladder cramps, DVT, CVA/TIA, Lung embolism, Sepsis, Acute Abdomen, and Other perioperative complications.
Recurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB.Until 135 days

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Narrow Band Imaging
Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) Narrow Band Imaging: Narrow Band Imaging
484
White Light Trans Urethral Resection
White Light Trans Urethral Resection White Light: White Light Cystoscopy
481
Total965

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNarrow Band ImagingWhite Light Trans Urethral ResectionTotal
Age, Continuous65.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.5
66.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3
66.24 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.41
Region of Enrollment
Austria
4 Participants8 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
52 Participants40 Participants92 Participants
Region of Enrollment
China
41 Participants34 Participants75 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
51 Participants67 Participants118 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
23 Participants17 Participants40 Participants
Region of Enrollment
India
14 Participants13 Participants27 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
3 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
97 Participants75 Participants172 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
41 Participants38 Participants79 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Norway
13 Participants16 Participants29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
29 Participants30 Participants59 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Korea
43 Participants48 Participants91 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
9 Participants13 Participants22 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Turkey
38 Participants39 Participants77 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Arab Emirates
6 Participants3 Participants9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
11 Participants17 Participants28 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
94 Participants98 Participants192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
390 Participants383 Participants773 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
25 / 48427 / 481

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer.

The primary outcome measure was recurrence rate at 1 year. A recurrence was defined as the new occurrence of a bladder cancer at the same site as or at a different site from the index cancer.

Time frame: 1 year after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Narrow Band ImagingNumber of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer.104 Participants
White LightNumber of Participants With Recurrence and Recurrence Rate at 1 Year Following Narrow Band Imaging and TURB (Arm A) Versus White Light Trans Urethral Resection of Bladder Cancer (TURB) (Arm B) in Patients With Non Muscle Invasive (pTa/T1) Bladder Cancer.109 Participants
Comparison: The expected recurrence rate in the WL-assisted TURBT group was 35%.14 To detect a clinically relevant difference in recurrence detection rates ≥10% at a 5% significance level and a power of 80%, the required sample size per treatment was calculated to be 329 patients (658 patients in total).p-value: 0.585Log Rank
Secondary

Number of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection

Time frame: 3 months after treatment

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Narrow Band ImagingNumber of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection59 Participants
White LightNumber of Participants With Persistence/Recurrence of Tumors at First 3 Month Follow up After NBI Versus WL Cystoscopy and Tumor Resection61 Participants
p-value: 0.742Chi-squared
Secondary

Peri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.

Grade I Any deviation from the normal postoperative course without the need for pharmacological treatment or surgical, endoscopic and radiological interventions. Grade II Requiring pharmacological treatment with drugs other than those allowed for grade I complications. Blood transfusions and total parenteral nutrition are also included. Grade III Requiring surgical, endoscopic or radiological intervention Grade III-a Intervention not under general anaesthesia Grade III-b Intervention under general anaesthesia Grade IV Life-threatening complication (including CNS complications: brain haemorrhage, ischaemic stroke, subarachnoid bleeding, but excluding transient ischaemic attacks) requiring IC/ICU management Grade IV-a Single organ dysfunction (including dialysis) Grade IV-b Multi-organ dysfunction Grade V Death of a patient

Time frame: 30 days

Population: The Clavien grading of perioperative complications variable contains missings, therefore the valid percentages are presented in the outcome measure data table. The NBI group had 2 missing values, and the WL group had 3 missing values. Therfore, the overall number deviates from 484 and 481.~Below shown is a categorical variable with 8 categories

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.None415 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.I28 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.II23 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IIIA11 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IIIB3 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IVA0 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IVB0 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.V2 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.V0 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.None429 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IIIB5 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.I19 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IVB0 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.II21 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IVA0 Participants
White LightPeri-operative Morbidity (30 Days) of TURB Between NBI and WL Resection Using the Clavien System.IIIA4 Participants
Comparison: The statistical analyses refers to comparison of the different 8 categories (one variable) mentioned of the Clavien grading of perioperative complications between Narrow Band Imaging and White Light Trans Urethral Resection.p-value: 0.17Fisher Exact
Secondary

Recurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB.

Time frame: Until 135 days

Population: Only 61 of the patients in the total population in the NBI group, and 69 of the patients in the total population of the WL group received a Re-TURBT after initial TURBT (within 135 days). These numbers therefore differ and deviate from the Participant Flow module.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Narrow Band ImagingRecurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB.27 participants
White LightRecurrence Rate Related to Additional Treatment Following TURB.27 participants
p-value: 0.553Chi-squared
Secondary

Risk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.

We looked at different perioperative complications in order to discover peri-operative morbidity after instrumental treatment. The following variables were analyzed: Bleeding, Fever, UTI, Bladder cramps, DVT, CVA/TIA, Lung embolism, Sepsis, Acute Abdomen, and Other perioperative complications.

Time frame: peri-operative

Population: The variables contain missing values, therefore the numbers in the below table differs from the overall numbers reported

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Bleeding36 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Fever9 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.UTI8 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Bladder cramps19 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.DVT0 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.CVA/TIA2 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Lung embolism0 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Sepsis2 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Acute Abdomen1 Participants
Narrow Band ImagingRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Other perioperative complication9 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Sepsis0 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Bleeding27 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.CVA/TIA0 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Fever7 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Other perioperative complication13 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.UTI10 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Lung embolism0 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Bladder cramps10 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.Acute Abdomen1 Participants
White LightRisk Factors for the Development of Peri-operative Morbidity After Instrumental Treatment.DVT0 Participants
Comparison: Comparison of the numbers in 'Bleeding' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.311Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of the numbers in 'Fever' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.666Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'UTI' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.569Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'Bladder cramps' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.111Chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'DVT' between NBI and WL
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'CVA/TIA' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.5Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'Lung embolism' between NBI and WL
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'Sepsis' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.5Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'Acute Abdomen' between NBI and WLp-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Comparison in the number of 'Other perioperative complication' between NBI and WLp-value: 0.17Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026