Skip to content

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain (Predictio)

Linking Altered Central Pain Processing and Genetic Polymorphism to Drug Efficacy in Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01179828
Acronym
Predictio
Enrollment
150
Registered
2010-08-11
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Low Back Pain

Keywords

Quantitative sensory testing, Drug efficacy, Low back pain syndrome, Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam, Tolterodine

Brief summary

Drug therapy in patients with chronic low back pain is a major challenge for physicians. One of the problems is the lacking knowledge in prediction of drug efficacy in a chosen patient. Usually one of the classes of pain medication is given to patients with a similar clinical picture, although different pain mechanisms may be responsible for this clinical picture. Another reason for variable drug efficacy are genetic polymorphisms, this may be the reason why an unique drug produces different responses (from a lacking analgesic effect up to excessive effect or side-effects. Quantitative sensory testing is a method that documents alterations in the pain perception system. Linking genetic polymorphisms to quantitative sensory testing may give us a tool for anticipation of drug efficacy.

Detailed description

Background Drug therapy is an essential part of pain treatment. However, only a minor part of pain patients benefits from the available treatments or is able to tolerate the drugs. One important limitation of drug therapy is lack of instruments to predict their effect. Indeed, in clinical practice classes of drugs (e.g. antidepressants) are given to classes of patients (e.g. neuropathic pain patients). However, within those classes of patients very different pain mechanisms are likely to underlie the pain condition in different patients. If drugs affect part of these mechanisms, they will not work in all patients. Another reason for variability in drug responses is genetic variation leading to a spectrum of different responses to analgesics, from lack of efficacy to exaggerated responses, up to intolerable adverse effects. Quantitative sensory testing comprises methods that document alterations and reorganization of the nociceptive system. Measuring an abnormal result in a chronic pain patient may provide us with the information that the underlying pain pathways somehow must be altered. An essential question is whether this information can be linked to drug efficacy in a mechanism-based treatment approach. A further important question is whether assessing genetic polymorphisms can explain different drug effects and hence help selecting the appropriate therapeutic strategy for individual patients. Objective We will test the hypothesis that there is a correlation between disturbances in specific pain mechanisms as assessed by quantitative sensory tests and analgesic efficacy after single-dose drug administration in patients with chronic low back pain. Genetic factors affecting drug metabolism and pain sensitivity will be analyzed as additional explanatory variables for drug efficacy. Methods Quantitative sensory testing: Heat pain threshold and tolerance, Ice water testing with central modulation of nociceptive input (DNIC), electrical pain detection and temporal summation (skin probe), pressure algometry with pain detection and threshold Drugs investigated: Imipramine, Oxycodone, Clobazam Blood samples: pharmacogenetics: Cytochrome variants CYP2D6, CYP2C19, CYP3A4, COMT haplotypes, CGH-1 variants, A118G of mu opioid receptor gene variants pharmacokinetics: kinetics of imipramine and desipramine

Interventions

DRUGOxycodone 15mg

15mg single administration p.o.

20mg single administration p.o.

DRUGImipramine

75mg single administration p.o.

DRUGTolterodine

1 mg single administration p.o.

Sponsors

University of Bern
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Zurich
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalborg University
CollaboratorOTHER
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Low back pain with NRS\>2 * Chronic low back pain since more than 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * use of pain medication other than paracetamol and ibuprofen in the last 7 days * suspicion of radicular pain * suspicion of intervertebral disk herniation * foraminal intervertebral stenosis * suspicion of polyneuropathy * diabetes * parkinson disease * alzheimer disease * glaucoma * prostata hyperplasia or voiding problems * known heart rhythm problems * heart insufficiency NYHA 3-4 * Systemic inflammatory disease * Ongoing oncologic disease * drug or alcohol abuse * Significant depressive disease (BDI-FS\>9)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Difference in NRS(pain scale) between measurement after and before drug administration07/2012

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patients global impression of change scale after drug administration07/2012
Pharmacogenetic variables(see before)07/2012
Pharmacokinetics: measure of Imipramine and desipramine blood levels07/2012
Reliability of repeated quantitative sensory testing in the same patient12/2010

Countries

Switzerland

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026