Skip to content

Regional Anesthesia and Lung Cancer Recurrence

The Effect of Adding Intraoperative Regional Anesthesia on Cancer Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Lung Cancer Resection

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01179308
Enrollment
67
Registered
2010-08-11
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2015-08-31
Last updated
2016-09-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

regional analgesia, routine general anesthesia, immune system response, lung cancer (stage 1-3)

Brief summary

Test the effect of combined regiona/general anesthesia on lung cancer recurrence compared to general anesthesia alone.

Detailed description

Surgery is the primary treatment of lung cancer, but surgery releases tumor cells into the systemic circulation. Whether this minimal residual disease results in clinical metastases is a function of host defense. At least three perioperative factors shift the balance toward initiation and progression of minimal residual disease. (1) Surgery per se depresses cell-mediated immunity, reduces concentrations of tumor-related anti-angiogenic factors (e.g., angiostatin and endostatin), and increases concentrations of pro-angiogenic factors such as VEGF. (2) Anesthesia impairs numerous immune functions, including neutrophil, macrophages, dendritic cells, T lymphocytes (T-cell), and Natural killer cell (NK-cell) functions. (3) Opioid analgesics inhibit both cellular and humoral immune function in humans, and promote tumor growth in rodents. Regional analgesia attenuates each of these adverse effects. For example, regional anesthesia largely prevents the neuroendocrine stress response to surgery by blocking afferent neural transmission. With combined regional and general anesthesia/analgesia, the amount of general anesthetic required is much reduced - as is, presumably, immune suppression. And finally, regional analgesia provides superb pain relief, essentially obliterating the need for postoperative opioids. Animal studies show that regional anesthesia improves natural kill cell function and reduces the metastatic burden in animals inoculated with carcinoma cells. Preliminary retrospective data in cancer patients showed, that paravertebral analgesia for breast cancer surgery reduced risk of recurrence or metastasis by 40% during a 2.5 to 4-year follow-up period. The investigators thus propose to evaluate the effect of combined epidural-general anesthesia compared to general anesthesia on cancer recurrence semi-annually over a period of 5 years.

Interventions

OTHERGeneral-epidural anesthesia

General anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia

OTHERBalanced general anesthesia and postoperative opioids

General anesthesia alone

Sponsors

The Cleveland Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary non-small cell lung cancer (stage 1-3) as determined according to the IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project; * Scheduled for potentially curative tumor resection; * Written informed consent, including willingness to be randomized to epidural anesthesia/analgesia plus general anesthesia or to general anesthesia and postoperative opioid analgesia.

Exclusion criteria

* Any contraindication to epidural anesthesia, (including coagulopathy, abnormal anatomy). * Any contraindication to midazolam, propofol, sevoflurane, fentanyl, morphine, or hydromorphone. * Age \< 18 or \> 85 years old. * Other cancer not believed by the attending surgeon to be in long-term remission.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
disease-free survivalup to 5 years after surgeryThe effect of regional versus general anesthesia on the primary outcome of disease-free survival (time to the earlier or recurrence or death from any cause)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
NK cell functionup to three years post procedureSecondary outcomes measured at repeated perioperative time points, include NK cell function, immune-function markers (cytokines, cortisol) and pain.
Immune function markersfor up to 3 years post procedureSecondary outcomes measured at repeated perioperative time points, include NK cell function, immune-function markers (cytokines, cortisol) and pain.
Painup to 3 years post proceudureSecondary outcomes measured at repeated perioperative time points, include NK cell function, immune-function markers (cytokines, cortisol) and pain.

Countries

China, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026