Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Homeopathy for Moderate Depression (Acute Phase)

Homeopathy for Depression: a Randomized, Partially Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Four Armed Study DEP-HOM

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01178255
Acronym
DEP-HOM
Enrollment
44
Registered
2010-08-10
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2012-07-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Major Depression

Keywords

depression, homoeopathy

Brief summary

To assess the two components of individualized homeopathic treatment for acute depression, i.e., to investigate the specific effect of individualized Q-potencies versus placebo and to investigate the effect of different approaches to the homeopathic case history taking(defined in this study as case history taking type I and II).

Detailed description

Homeopathy is often sought by patients with depression. In classical homeopathy, the treatment consists of two main elements: the taking of the case history and the prescription of an individually selected homeopathic remedy. Homeopathic medicines are produced through sequential, agitated dilutions. A Q-Potency is prepared by grinding the raw material, followed by a process of consecutive 1:50.000 agitated dilutions. Previous data suggest that individualized homeopathic Q-potencies were non inferior to the antidepressant fluoxetine in a sample of patients with moderate to severe major depression. The question remains whether individualized homeopathic Q-potencies have a specific therapeutical effect in acute depression as this has not yet been investigated.

Interventions

DRUGhomeopathic q-potencies

individualised homeopathic medicines

DRUGPlacebo

placebo

OTHERhomeopathic case history taking type I

one special homeopathic technique for case history taking

OTHERhomeopathic case history type II

another type of homeopathic case history taking

Sponsors

Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnosis of major depression by a psychiatrist, * patients must not be currently taking antidepressants or anxiolytic drugs (with the exception of Lorazepam as rescue medication, maximal dose 1.5 mg/day) * Capability and willingness to give informed consent and to comply with the study procedures will also be required

Exclusion criteria

* current mild episode of depression (HAM-D \< 17) * current severe episode of depression (HAM-D \> 24) * schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders * bipolar affective disorder * schizoaffective disorders * alcohol or other substance abuse * eating disorders * a clinically significant (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders)-Axis II disorder * severe depression, which previously motivated a suicide attempt * a score of 4 or 5 in the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)up to three months before screening; * a clinically significant acute or chronic disease that would hinder regular participation in the study * treatment with antipsychotics, antidepressants, sedatives/hypnotics or mood stabilizers four weeks prior to the screening * complementary or alternative treatment simultaneously to the study (for example, acupuncture, phytotherapy, etc.) * homeopathic treatment eight weeks prior to study entry * psychotherapy * simultaneous participation in another clinical trial (the last participation in a previous clinical trial must be completed at least three months prior to screening) * concomitant pregnancy or breastfeeding * patients who are assumed to have a linguistic, intellectual or any other reason for not understanding the meaning of the clinical trial and for not complying with the necessary study procedures * persons who have been institutionalized by a court order * patients with an application for a pension

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
primary endpoint is the mean total depression score post treatmentsix weekstotal score on the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale - (HAM-D)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
mean total depression score during the treatmenttwo and four weekstotal score on Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)
response and remission ratestwo, four and six weeksresponse (decrease of 50% or more from baseline HAM-D score); remission (HAM-D scores ≤ 7)
Self-rated depression scoretwo, four and six weeksBeck Depression inventory (BDI) total score
quality of life assessmenttwo, four and six weekstotal mean score on the SF-12 Health Survey
Safetytwo, four and six weeksAdverse events will be collected during the study and will form part of the secondary endpoint data in determining the safety of homeopathic medicines. Adverse events and serious adverse events will be registered in accordance with the ICH-Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026