Skip to content

A Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

AMBITION: A Randomised, Multicenter Study of First-Line Ambrisentan and Tadalafil Combination Therapy in Subjects With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01178073
Acronym
AMBITION
Enrollment
610
Registered
2010-08-09
Start date
2010-10-01
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2017-09-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension, Pulmonary

Keywords

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Ambrisentan, Sponsor Rest of World: GSK, Tadalafil, PAH, Sponsor US: Gilead

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the two treatment strategies; first-line combination therapy (ambrisentan and tadalafil) versus first-line monotherapy (ambrisentan or tadalafil) in subjects with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. This will be assessed by time to the first clinical failure event.

Interventions

DRUGambrisentan

ambrisentan (target dose: 10mg)

DRUGtadalafil

tadalafil (target dose: 40mg)

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects must have a diagnosis of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH) due to the following: a. idiopathic or heritable PAH b. PAH associated with: i. connective tissue disease (e.g., limited scleroderma, diffuse scleroderma, mixed connective tissue disease, systemic lupus erythematosus, or overlap syndrome) ii. drugs or toxins iii. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection iv. congenital heart defects repaired greater than 1 year prior to screening (i.e., atrial septal defects, ventricular septal defects, and patent ductus arteriosus) NB: subjects with portopulmonary hypertension and pulmonary veno-occlusive disease are NOT eligible for the study * Subject must have a current diagnosis of being in World Health Organisation (WHO) Functional Class II or III. * Subject must meet all of the following haemodynamic criteria by means of a right heart catheterization prior to screening: i. mPAP of ≥25 mmHg ii. PVR ≥ 300 dynes/sec/cm5 iii. PCWP or LVEDP of ≤12 mmHg if PVR ≥300 to \<500 dyne/sec/cm5 , or PCWP/LVEDP ≤ 15 mmHg if PVR ≥500 dynes/sec/cm5 * Subject must walk a distance of ≥125m and ≤500m at the screening visit

Exclusion criteria

* Subject received previous PAH therapy (phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i), endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA), chronic prostanoid\*) within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit (\*Chronic prostanoid use is considered \>7 days of treatment) * Subject received ERA treatment (e.g., bosentan or sitaxentan) or PDE5i treatment (e.g. Sildenafil) at any time AND discontinued due to tolerance issues other than those associated with liver function abnormalities * Subjects who have previously discontinued ambrisentan or tadalafil in either another clinical study or commercial product (Volibris/Letairis or Adcirca) for safety or tolerability reasons.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVFrom Baseline up to the Final Assessment Visit (FAV) (average of 609 days)Time to the first adjudicated CF event (death, hospitalization for worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension \[PAH\], disease progression, or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response) after initiating either first-line combination therapy with AMB and TAD or first-line monotherapy with either drug (AMB or TAD) in par. with PAH was assessed. If data was not available for some par. following a loss to follow-up, their event times were treated as censored at their last assessment time for the statistical analyses. FAV occurred approximately 4 weeks after the predicted 105th adjudicated first CF event was reached. Par. who had an FAV, and who had no adjudicated events or whose first adjudicated event occurred after their FAV, were censored at their individual FAV. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized par. who met the PAH diagnosis and inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in protocol amendment 2 and who also received at least one dose of investigational product (IP).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24Baseline and Week 24N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) is a surrogate marker of heart failure. The data were log-transformed. The geometric mean was calculated (based on the log-transformed data). The geometric mean ratio was calculated as the ratio between the Week 24 value and the Baseline value (based on the log-transformed data) and presented as percent change = 100 \* (geometric mean ratio - 1). The Baseline value is the last value prior to administration of study drug; this may be prior to or on the day of study drug initiation. No imputation was performed for missing data. The secondary endpoints were analyzed according to a pre-specified hierarchical testing procedure.
Percentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24Baseline and Week 24A satisfactory clinical response at Week 24 is defined as a participant who meets all of the following criteria: 10% improvement in 6MWD compared with Baseline; improvement to or maintenance of World Health Organization (WHO) class I or II symptoms; no events of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit. Clinical worsening events included: death, hospitalization for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and disease progression. Participants without an event of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit who did not have a 6MWD value or a WHO functional class value at Week 24 were excluded from the analysis.
Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 24Baseline and Week 24The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test measures the distance that a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned a rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times. Baseline 6MWD comprised of an average of the last two consecutive measurements prior to randomization that varied by no greater than 10%. If only one measurement was available, that measurement was used. If no two consecutive measures vary by no greater than 10% then Baseline was based on the last two consecutive measures for a participant.
Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 24Baseline and Week 24The WHO Functional Class (FC) indicates the severity of PAH and is an adaptation of the New York Heart Association classification. It was assessed by the investigator. There are four grades for WHO FC based on severity of symptoms (Class I = none, Class IV = most severe). Baseline WHO FC is the latest assessment prior to dosing (i.e., at Randomization or Screening). Change from Baseline at Week 24 was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observations was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times.
Change From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24Baseline (BL) and Week 24Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6 minute walk test. The BDI was calculated by using the Borg category (C) ratio (R) CR10 scale which starts at 0 (nothing at all) and has no upper limit (extremely strong). Change from BL was calculated as the Week 24 values minus the BL value. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. The BL BDI score is the average of the two BDI values obtained following the two 6MWD tests used in determining the BL 6MWD. A negative change from BL in the BDI score represented an improvement for the participant. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times.

Countries

Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

500 participants (par.) in the ITT Population were also included in the modified ITT Population (those who also met the modified inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in the protocol amendment 2). Disposition results below have been presented for the ITT Population.

Pre-assignment details

A total of 610 par. were randomized; however, only 605 were included in the Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population (randomized par. who received at least one dose of IP). All par. received a minimum of 24 weeks of therapy unless they died or withdrew.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + Tadalafil
Participants initially received one tablet of 5 milligrams (mg) ambrisentan (AMB) and one tablet of AMB matching placebo once daily (QD) for the first 8 weeks plus one tablet of 20 mg tadalafil (TAD) and one tablet of TAD matching placebo QD for the first 4 weeks. The TAD dose was uptitrated to 40 mg (two tablets of 20 mg QD) after 4 weeks and the AMB dose may have been uptitrated to 10 mg (two tablets of 5 mg QD) after 8 weeks. The uptitration of AMB to 10 mg was not mandatory if the investigator decided for tolerability reasons the participants should remain on 5 mg.
302
Ambrisentan Monotherapy
Participants initially received one tablet of 5 mg AMB and one tablet of AMB matching placebo QD for the first 8 weeks plus two tablets of TAD matching placebo. The AMB dose may have been uptitrated to 10 mg (two tablets of 5 mg QD) and two tablets of TAD matching placebo after 8 weeks. The uptitration of AMB to 10 mg was not mandatory if the investigator decided for tolerability reasons the participants should remain on 5 mg.
152
Tadalafil Monotherapy
Participants initially received one tablet of 20 mg TAD and one tablet of TAD matching placebo QD for the first 4 weeks plus two tablets of AMB matching placebo. The TAD dose was uptitrated to 40 mg (two tablets of 20 mg QD) and two tablets of AMB matching placebo after 4 weeks.
151
Total605

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event342724
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up203
Overall StudyMissing Completion Status100
Overall StudyPhysician Decision141010
Overall StudyProtocol Violation111
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1068

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCombination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilAmbrisentan MonotherapyTadalafil MonotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.86
55.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
55.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.75
55.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.21
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
11 Participants14 Participants13 Participants38 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaskan Native
2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Central/South Asian Heritage
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Missing
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic /North African Heritage
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
280 Participants131 Participants133 Participants544 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
223 Participants117 Participants121 Participants461 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
79 Participants35 Participants30 Participants144 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
279 / 302140 / 152135 / 151
serious
Total, serious adverse events
124 / 30263 / 15268 / 151

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAV

Time to the first adjudicated CF event (death, hospitalization for worsening pulmonary arterial hypertension \[PAH\], disease progression, or unsatisfactory long-term clinical response) after initiating either first-line combination therapy with AMB and TAD or first-line monotherapy with either drug (AMB or TAD) in par. with PAH was assessed. If data was not available for some par. following a loss to follow-up, their event times were treated as censored at their last assessment time for the statistical analyses. FAV occurred approximately 4 weeks after the predicted 105th adjudicated first CF event was reached. Par. who had an FAV, and who had no adjudicated events or whose first adjudicated event occurred after their FAV, were censored at their individual FAV. Modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Population: all randomized par. who met the PAH diagnosis and inclusion/exclusion criteria defined in protocol amendment 2 and who also received at least one dose of investigational product (IP).

Time frame: From Baseline up to the Final Assessment Visit (FAV) (average of 609 days)

Population: mITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDisease progression10 Participants
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDeath (all-cause)9 Participants
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVUnsatisfactory long-term clinical response17 Participants
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVHospitalization for worsening PAH10 Participants
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVFirst adjudicated clinical failure event46 Participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVHospitalization for worsening PAH30 Participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDisease progression16 Participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVUnsatisfactory long-term clinical response23 Participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDeath (all-cause)8 Participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVFirst adjudicated clinical failure event77 Participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVHospitalization for worsening PAH18 Participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVFirst adjudicated clinical failure event43 Participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDeath (all-cause)2 Participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDisease progression12 Participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVUnsatisfactory long-term clinical response11 Participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDisease progression4 Participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVDeath (all-cause)6 Participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVFirst adjudicated clinical failure event34 Participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVHospitalization for worsening PAH12 Participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyNumber of Participants With First Adjudicated Clinical Failure (CF) Event, Death, Hospitalisation for Worsening PAH, Disease Progression, Unsatisfactory Long-term Clinical Response, All Through FAVUnsatisfactory long-term clinical response12 Participants
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [0.348, 0.724]Stratified Log Rank
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [0.314, 0.723]Stratified Log Rank
p-value: 0.004595% CI: [0.338, 0.827]Stratified Log Rank
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24

Borg Dyspnea Index (BDI) indicates the degree of breathlessness after completion of the 6 minute walk test. The BDI was calculated by using the Borg category (C) ratio (R) CR10 scale which starts at 0 (nothing at all) and has no upper limit (extremely strong). Change from BL was calculated as the Week 24 values minus the BL value. The BDI scale was assessed by each participant. The BL BDI score is the average of the two BDI values obtained following the two 6MWD tests used in determining the BL 6MWD. A negative change from BL in the BDI score represented an improvement for the participant. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times.

Time frame: Baseline (BL) and Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only participants with Baseline data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilChange From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24-1.00 Scores on a scale
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilChange From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24-0.50 Scores on a scale
Ambrisentan MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24-0.50 Scores on a scale
Tadalafil MonotherapyChange From Baseline in Borg Dyspnea Index at Week 24-0.50 Scores on a scale
95% CI: [-0.75, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
95% CI: [-1, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
95% CI: [-1, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 24

The 6-minute walk distance (6MWD) test measures the distance that a participant can walk in a period of 6 minutes. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observation was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned a rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times. Baseline 6MWD comprised of an average of the last two consecutive measurements prior to randomization that varied by no greater than 10%. If only one measurement was available, that measurement was used. If no two consecutive measures vary by no greater than 10% then Baseline was based on the last two consecutive measures for a participant.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only participants with Baseline data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 2448.98 Meters
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 2423.80 Meters
Ambrisentan MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 2427.00 Meters
Tadalafil MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the 6 Minute Walk Distance Test at Week 2422.70 Meters
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [12, 33.5]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
p-value: 0.000595% CI: [11, 38.5]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [8, 33.7]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 24

The WHO Functional Class (FC) indicates the severity of PAH and is an adaptation of the New York Heart Association classification. It was assessed by the investigator. There are four grades for WHO FC based on severity of symptoms (Class I = none, Class IV = most severe). Baseline WHO FC is the latest assessment prior to dosing (i.e., at Randomization or Screening). Change from Baseline at Week 24 was calculated as the Week 24 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed based on the last observation carried forward data, except in the case of an adjudicated clinical failure event of death or hospitalization preceding the missing data observation. In this case, the missing observations was assigned the worst-rank score relative to those actually observed and was assigned rank reflecting the relative order of the actual event times.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only participants with Baseline data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilChange From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 240.0 Scores on a scale
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilChange From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 240.0 Scores on a scale
Ambrisentan MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 240.0 Scores on a scale
Tadalafil MonotherapyChange From Baseline in the World Health Organization Functional Class at Week 240.0 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.228795% CI: [0, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
95% CI: [0, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
95% CI: [0, 0]Stratified Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 24

A satisfactory clinical response at Week 24 is defined as a participant who meets all of the following criteria: 10% improvement in 6MWD compared with Baseline; improvement to or maintenance of World Health Organization (WHO) class I or II symptoms; no events of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit. Clinical worsening events included: death, hospitalization for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and disease progression. Participants without an event of clinical worsening prior to or at the Week 24 visit who did not have a 6MWD value or a WHO functional class value at Week 24 were excluded from the analysis.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only those participants who had a Yes/No response were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilPercentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 2439 Percentage of participants
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilPercentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 2429 Percentage of participants
Ambrisentan MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 2431 Percentage of participants
Tadalafil MonotherapyPercentage of Participants With a Satisfactory Clinical Response at Week 2427 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.026495% CI: [1.054, 2.319]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.151895% CI: [0.878, 2.308]Regression, Logistic
p-value: 0.032195% CI: [1.047, 2.833]Regression, Logistic
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24

N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) is a surrogate marker of heart failure. The data were log-transformed. The geometric mean was calculated (based on the log-transformed data). The geometric mean ratio was calculated as the ratio between the Week 24 value and the Baseline value (based on the log-transformed data) and presented as percent change = 100 \* (geometric mean ratio - 1). The Baseline value is the last value prior to administration of study drug; this may be prior to or on the day of study drug initiation. No imputation was performed for missing data. The secondary endpoints were analyzed according to a pre-specified hierarchical testing procedure.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 24

Population: mITT Population. Only participants with data available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Combination Therapy: Ambrisentan + TadalafilPercent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24-67.15 Percent changeStandard Error 0.069
Monotherapy Pooled: Ambrisentan or TadalafilPercent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24-50.37 Percent changeStandard Error 0.07
Ambrisentan MonotherapyPercent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24-56.15 Percent changeStandard Error 0.096
Tadalafil MonotherapyPercent Change From Baseline in the N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide at Week 24-43.83 Percent changeStandard Error 0.095
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-44.78, -20.66]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.011195% CI: [-40.04, -6.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-53.16, -26.97]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 15, 2026