Skip to content

Intra-arterial Y-90 TheraSpheres for Hepatic Metastases From Solid Tumors

Intra-arterial Y-90 TheraSpheres for Hepatic Metastases From Solid Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01177007
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-08-06
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2014-08-31
Last updated
2017-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Liver Neoplasms

Keywords

Gastrointestinal Diseases, Colonic Diseases, Intestinal Diseases, Rectal Diseases, Neoplastic Processes, Pathologic Processes, Neuroendocrine Tumors, Neuroectodermal Tumors, Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal, Adenocarcinoma, Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue, Liver Diseases, Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasm Metastasis, Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine, Liver Neoplasms, Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial, Neoplasms by Histologic Type, Intestinal Neoplasms, Gastrointestinal Neoplasms, Digestive System Neoplasms, Neoplasms by Site, Digestive System Diseases

Brief summary

This study is an open label prospective trial of TheraSphere treatment for patients who have liver metastases who have failed or are intolerant to other systemic or liver directed therapies. Patients will be treated with TheraSphere at doses of 120 ± 10% Gy, and then followed for time to progression (TTP), safety, and overall survival.

Interventions

DEVICETheraSphere, Yttrium-90 glass Microspheres

Patients with unilobar disease will receive 120 ± 10% Gy (dose may be lower if clinically indicated) of TheraSphere to the affected lobe. Patients presenting with bilobar disease will have their liver assessed and the lobe presenting the highest treatment priority will receive the first treatment of TheraSphere. Assigning priority of lobes to receive treatment is based on tumor bulk, associated clinical symptoms attributed to the tumor and technical/angiographic considerations. In patients with bilobar disease where the second lobe does not require immediate treatment, or in unilobar disease where tumors develop in the untreated lobe, additional TheraSphere treatment may be administered at any subsequent time. A treatment may consist of a single 120 ± 10% Gy infusion to a lobe, or, if angiography indicates the need, the 120 ± 10% Gy dose may be split into multiple infusions per lobe to ensure delivery of a total of 120 ± 10% Gy to each treated lobe.

Sponsors

Yale University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 years of age or older, * Patients with a diagnosis of metastatic disease to the liver who have failed or are intolerant to other systemic or liver directed therapies. A patient is considered to have failed to other systemic or liver-directed therapies when, in the opinion of the referring physician, the patient has progression of disease after receiving standard approved therapies. Specifically, if a patient has failed first line chemotherapy (or the standard approved therapies for that particular solid tumor), in the time period designed to assess that particular regimen (at least 30 days), then they may be enrolled into this protocol. A patient is intolerant to other systemic or liver-directed therapies when, in the opinion of the referring physician, for example, the patient is unable to tolerate appropriate chemotherapy, when the patient had residual toxicity from previous therapies (e.g. neuropathy from oxaliplatin), or when the patient's performance status is such that treatment with systemic therapies would result in excessive toxicity. * Liver metastases are unresectable * Target tumors should be measurable using standard imaging techniques * Tumor replacement ≤ 70% of total liver volume based on visual estimation by the Investigator * Tumors are hypervascular based on visual estimation by the Investigator * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0-2 * At least one month has elapsed since most recent prior cancer therapy with the following exceptions * Patients who are receiving Sandostatin for treatment of Neuroendocrine cancer may be enrolled and continue their Sandostatin treatment. * Patients receiving anti-oestrogen therapy for breast cancer may continue their treatment if therapy was initiated greater than 30 days prior to TheraSphere treatment. * Chemotherapy may continue if there is evidence of progression, in the liver, on treatment providing there is no change in the therapy in the 1 month prior to TheraSphere treatment and any immediate chemotherapeutic toxicity that will complicate TheraSphere treatment is resolved. In this case, the chemotherapy may continue because it is continuing to control the extrahepatic disease. * Patient is willing to participate in the study and has signed the study informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* At risk of hepatic or renal failure, as indicated by any of the following pre-treatment laboratory and clinical findings within 28 days of treatment: * Serum creatinine \> 2.0 mg/dL, unless on dialysis * Serum total bilirubin ≥ 2.0 mg/dL * Albumin \< 2.0 g/dL * Any history of hepatic encephalopathy * Contraindications to angiography and selective visceral catheterization that may include, but are not limited to, the following: * Any bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that is not correctable by usual therapy or hemostatic agents (e.g., closure device) * Severe peripheral vascular disease precluding catheterization * History of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives or atropine that cannot be managed medically. * Severe liver dysfunction or presentation of pulmonary insufficiency or a clinically evident history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease * Cirrhosis or portal hypertension * Previous external beam radiation treatment to the liver * Any intervention for, or compromise of the Ampulla of Vater * Clinically evident ascites. (Note: A radiographic finding of trace ascites on imaging is acceptable). * Any continuing complications of prior cancer therapy that have not improved or resolved prior to 21 days before the first treatment with TheraSphere (if the investigator determines that the continuing complication will compromise the safety of the patient following treatment with TheraSphere). * In the judgment of the physician, significant life-threatening extrahepatic disease * Concurrent enrollment in another clinical study * Evidence on technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) scan that demonstrates lung shunting with a potential absorbed dose of radiation to the lungs \>30 Gy. The 30 Gy limit is a cumulative limit over all infusions of TheraSphere. * Evidence on technetium-99m macroaggregated albumin (99mTc-MAA) scan that demonstrates a potential for the deposition of microspheres to the gastrointestinal tract that cannot be corrected by placement of the catheter distal to collateral vessels or using standard angiographic techniques, such as coil embolization. * A positive serum pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential * In the Investigator's judgment, any co-morbid disease or condition or event (e.g., recent myocardial infarction) that would place the patient at undue risk, and that would preclude safe use of TheraSphere

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Progression (TTP) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST CriteriaEvaluated 4 weeks following each TheraSpheres procedure, and at 2-3 month intervals thereafter.This outcome was not assessed. Instead, the primary outcome of progression-free survival based on RECIST and EASL criteria was assessed and reported.
Progression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL Criteria2 yearsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of Y-90 radioembolization to date of disease progression or latest follow-up. PFS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type. RECIST and EASL criteria were used to assess progression with kappa value for intermethod agreement of treatment responses of 0.9.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Criteria12 monthsEfficacy as assessed by radiographic tumor response using EASL criteria at baseline up to 12 months post treatment. Complete Response (CR): Achieving 100% tumor necrosis of targeted lesions Partial Response (PR): Demonstrating greater than 50% tumor necrosis in targeted lesions Progressive Disease (PD): Reappearance of or increased tumor enhancement greater than 25% in targeted lesions Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting requirements for CR or PR and not demonstrating evidence of progression in targeted lesions.
Overall Survival (OS)Median follow-up time was 11.41 months (CI: 1.5-33.7)Measured from the date corresponding to initiation of therapy until the date of death due to any cause. At the time of registration, the outcome measure was entered in clinicaltrials.gov as open-ended. Overall survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type.
Time to Progression (TTP) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to EASL CriteriaEvaluated 4 weeks following each TheraSpheres procedure, and at 2-3 month intervals thereafter.This outcome was not assessed. Instead, the primary outcome of progression-free survival based on RECIST and EASL criteria was assessed and reported.
Safety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.012 monthsClinical and biochemical toxicity that were assessed as at least possibly related to treatment were recorded from the day of treatment until protocol exit or death. Toxicities were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0.
Mean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total Liver24 hoursTherasphere dose calculation was performed using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging post-procedure to estimate the actual delivered dose of Theraspheres to the liver.
Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 YearsUp to 2 yearsMeasured from the date corresponding to initiation of therapy until the date of death due to any cause. At the time of registration, the outcome measure was entered in clinicaltrials.gov as open-ended. At the time of results reporting, this outcome was presented as Up to 2 years. Overall survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type. 2-year OS rates were also stratified based on tumor burden.
Tumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.012 monthsEfficacy as assessed by radiographic tumor response using RECIST criteria at baseline, at 4 weeks post treatment, and subsequent 3 month intervals. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all lesions targeted by Y90 Partial Response (PR): At least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of lesions targeted by Y90 Progressive Disease (PD): At least 20% increase in sum of LD of lesions targeted by Y90 Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study enrolled patients diagnosed with unresectable hepatic metastases who have failed or were intolerant to at least one line of systemic chemotherapy or liver-directed therapy. Participants were enrolled at Johns Hopkins Hospital with the last patient completed in April 2015.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
TheraSphere
TheraSphere, Yttrium-90 glass Microspheres: Patients with unilobar disease will receive 120 ± 10% Gy (dose may be lower if clinically indicated) of TheraSphere to the affected lobe. Patients presenting with bilobar disease will have their liver assessed and the lobe presenting the highest treatment priority will receive the first treatment of TheraSphere. Assigning priority of lobes to receive treatment is based on tumor bulk, associated clinical symptoms attributed to the tumor and technical/angiographic considerations. In patients with bilobar disease where the second lobe does not require immediate treatment, or in unilobar disease where tumors develop in the untreated lobe, additional TheraSphere treatment may be administered at any subsequent time
50
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyChange in treatment modality21
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyEntered hospice care5
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2
Overall StudyRequired additional Y90 treatment6

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTheraSphere
Age, Continuous59.3 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 50
other
Total, other adverse events
48 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL Criteria

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of Y-90 radioembolization to date of disease progression or latest follow-up. PFS was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type. RECIST and EASL criteria were used to assess progression with kappa value for intermethod agreement of treatment responses of 0.9.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Median PFS for all subjects and stratified based on disease type.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TheraSphereProgression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL CriteriaMedian PFS for all disease types10.3 months
TheraSphereProgression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL CriteriaMedian PFS for CRC22.0 months
TheraSphereProgression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL CriteriaMedian PFS for NE9.5 months
TheraSphereProgression-free Survival (PFS) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST and EASL CriteriaMedian PFS for non-CRC/non-NE15.8 months
Primary

Time to Progression (TTP) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to RECIST Criteria

This outcome was not assessed. Instead, the primary outcome of progression-free survival based on RECIST and EASL criteria was assessed and reported.

Time frame: Evaluated 4 weeks following each TheraSpheres procedure, and at 2-3 month intervals thereafter.

Population: These data were not collected. See outcome measure #2.

Secondary

Mean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total Liver

Therasphere dose calculation was performed using positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging post-procedure to estimate the actual delivered dose of Theraspheres to the liver.

Time frame: 24 hours

Population: Mean radiation doses were calculated for the total cohort of participants and also stratified according to disease type - colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine, and non-CRC/non-NE.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TheraSphereMean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total LiverMean dosing for non-CRC/non-NE115.18 GrayStandard Deviation 16.37
TheraSphereMean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total LiverMean radiation dose for all patients112.13 GrayStandard Deviation 13.56
TheraSphereMean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total LiverMean dosing for CRC115.57 GrayStandard Deviation 10.97
TheraSphereMean Radiation Dose Delivered to Total LiverMean dosing for NE109.41 GrayStandard Deviation 13.08
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Measured from the date corresponding to initiation of therapy until the date of death due to any cause. At the time of registration, the outcome measure was entered in clinicaltrials.gov as open-ended. Overall survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type.

Time frame: Median follow-up time was 11.41 months (CI: 1.5-33.7)

Population: Median OS for all patients (n=50) were analyzed and also stratified based on disease type: CRC (n=12); NE (n=26); and non-CRC/non-NE (n=12).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS)Median OS for all disease types11.7 months
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS)Median OS for CRC11.9 months
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS)Median OS for NE7.6 months
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS)Median OS for non-CRC/non-NE15.8 months
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 Years

Measured from the date corresponding to initiation of therapy until the date of death due to any cause. At the time of registration, the outcome measure was entered in clinicaltrials.gov as open-ended. At the time of results reporting, this outcome was presented as Up to 2 years. Overall survival was analyzed via Kaplan-Meier methodology with log-rank test using all 50 patients on study and stratified based on disease type. 2-year OS rates were also stratified based on tumor burden.

Time frame: Up to 2 years

Population: 2-year OS rate for all patients (n=50) were analyzed and also stratified based on tumor burden: Patients with tumor burden of 25% or less (n=34) and patients with tumor burden greater than 25% (n=16).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 YearsOS rate for tumor burden 25% or less36 percentage of participants
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 YearsOS rate for all patients22 percentage of participants
TheraSphereOverall Survival (OS) Rate at 2 YearsOS rate for tumor burden greater than 25%0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0

Clinical and biochemical toxicity that were assessed as at least possibly related to treatment were recorded from the day of treatment until protocol exit or death. Toxicities were graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 50 participants were assessed for adverse events, with a total of 207 adverse events reported. Two patients had grade 5 toxicities (grade 5 cholecystitis and death), which were attributed to disease progression and were not device-related.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Elevated alkaline phosphatase21 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Elevated ALT13 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Elevated AST11 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Lymphocyte depression (asymptomatic)23 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Fatigue33 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Fever8 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Nausea19 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Heartburn6 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Vomiting6 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Pain23 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Decreased albumin4 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Elevated bilirubin3 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Anorexia11 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Weight loss13 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Constipation7 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Muscle pain1 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Cholecystitis1 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Death (disease progression)1 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Allergic reaction (contrast media)1 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Thrombosis/embolism (vascular access)1 adverse events
TheraSphereSafety as Graded by CTCAE Version 3.0Liver failure1 adverse events
Secondary

Time to Progression (TTP) of the Treated Lesion(s) According to EASL Criteria

This outcome was not assessed. Instead, the primary outcome of progression-free survival based on RECIST and EASL criteria was assessed and reported.

Time frame: Evaluated 4 weeks following each TheraSpheres procedure, and at 2-3 month intervals thereafter.

Population: Analysis for TTP was not performed. In lieu of TTP, the PFS based on RECIST and EASL criteria was analyzed.

Secondary

Tumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0

Efficacy as assessed by radiographic tumor response using RECIST criteria at baseline, at 4 weeks post treatment, and subsequent 3 month intervals. Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all lesions targeted by Y90 Partial Response (PR): At least 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameter (LD) of lesions targeted by Y90 Progressive Disease (PD): At least 20% increase in sum of LD of lesions targeted by Y90 Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage for PR nor sufficient increase for PD.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: RECIST for all applicable patients (n=43) were analyzed and also stratified based on disease type: CRC (n=9); NE (n=22); and non-CRC/non-NE (n=12).

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0All disease typesPartial Response (PR)9 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0All disease typesComplete Response (CR)11 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0All disease typesStable Disease (SD)11 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0All disease typesProgressive Disease (PD)12 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Colorectal cancer onlyComplete Response (CR)1 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Colorectal cancer onlyPartial Response (PR)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Colorectal cancer onlyStable Disease (SD)2 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Colorectal cancer onlyProgressive Disease (PD)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Neuroendocrine onlyComplete Response (CR)7 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Neuroendocrine onlyPartial Response (PR)4 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Neuroendocrine onlyStable Disease (SD)6 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Neuroendocrine onlyProgressive Disease (PD)5 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Non-CRC/Non-NEComplete Response (CR)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Non-CRC/Non-NEPartial Response (PR)2 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Non-CRC/Non-NEStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.0Non-CRC/Non-NEProgressive Disease (PD)4 Participants
Secondary

Tumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) Criteria

Efficacy as assessed by radiographic tumor response using EASL criteria at baseline up to 12 months post treatment. Complete Response (CR): Achieving 100% tumor necrosis of targeted lesions Partial Response (PR): Demonstrating greater than 50% tumor necrosis in targeted lesions Progressive Disease (PD): Reappearance of or increased tumor enhancement greater than 25% in targeted lesions Stable Disease (SD): Not meeting requirements for CR or PR and not demonstrating evidence of progression in targeted lesions.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: RECIST for all applicable patients (n=43) were analyzed and also stratified based on disease type: CRC (n=9); NE (n=22); and non-CRC/non-NE (n=12). 7 out of the 50 patients were not analyzed due to lack of follow-up imaging.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaColorectal cancer onlyComplete Response (CR)1 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaColorectal cancer onlyPartial Response (PR)2 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaColorectal cancer onlyStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaColorectal cancer onlyProgressive Disease (PD)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNeuroendocrine onlyComplete Response (CR)7 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNeuroendocrine onlyPartial Response (PR)5 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNeuroendocrine onlyStable Disease (SD)4 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNeuroendocrine onlyProgressive Disease (PD)6 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNon-CRC/Non-NEComplete Response (CR)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNon-CRC/Non-NEPartial Response (PR)2 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNon-CRC/Non-NEStable Disease (SD)3 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaNon-CRC/Non-NEProgressive Disease (PD)4 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaAll disease typesComplete Response (CR)11 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaAll disease typesPartial Response (PR)9 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaAll disease typesStable Disease (SD)10 Participants
TheraSphereTumor Response by the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) CriteriaAll disease typesProgressive Disease (PD)13 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026