Skip to content

A Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole In The Treatment Of Patients With Candidemia And/Or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis

A Phase Iiib, Open-label, Randomized, Multi-center Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Anidulafungin Vs. Fluconazole, In The Treatment Of Subjects With Candidemia And/or Other Forms Of Invasive Candidiasis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01176058
Enrollment
17
Registered
2010-08-05
Start date
2010-12-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2015-10-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Candidemia

Keywords

Phase 3b, Efficacy and Safety evaluation of Anidulafungin, ICC

Brief summary

In the treatment of patients with candidemia and/or other forms of invasive candidiasis , Anidulafungin is at least as effective and safe as Fluconazole.

Detailed description

To support anidulafungin NDA in China Due to the challenges in subject recruitment resulting in protracted study course, Pfizer Inc. has decided to terminate trial A8851023 prematurely based on the recommendation by the senior management team on November 8, 2011. The decision to terminate the trial was not based on any safety concerns. All investigators were verbally informed by the study team since November 8, 2011 to stop the subject recruitment as soon as possible. All 17 enrolled subjects have been followed up on safety issues and no safety concerns were present by the data of these subjects.

Interventions

DRUGAnidulafungin/Fluconazole

Anidulafungin:IV,100 mg daily preceded by an initial 200 mg dose on Day 1, 14 - 42 days Fluconazole: IV/Oral, 400mg,QD,14 - 42 days

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of candidemia or invasive candidiasis. * Presence of one or more of signs and symptoms of acute fungal infection.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects who received greater than 48 hours of systemic antifungal treatment for the Candida infection for which they will be enrolled. * Subjects with hypersensitivity to echinocandins or azole therapy or drug excipients.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were not available \[N/A\] for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.
Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were N/A for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTEnd of Treatment (Up to Day 42)Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpPost treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).
Number of Participants Who DiedBaseline to Day 52
Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITEnd of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Countries

China

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Anidulafungin
Intravenous (IV) Anidulafungin loading dose of 200 mg on Day 1 and then 100 mg daily from Day 2. Participants who completed a minimum of 7 days of IV treatment may have continued with IV treatment or may have been switched to oral fluconazole 400 mg daily up to a maximum of Day 42.
9
Fluconazole
IV fluconazole 400 mg daily dose from Day 1 (dose reduction according to the participant's tolerability). Participants who completed a minimum of 7 days of IV treatment may have continued with IV treatment or may have been switched to oral fluconazole 400 mg daily up to a maximum of Day 42.
8
Total17

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyInsufficient clinical response22
Overall StudyInsufficient mycological response01
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAnidulafunginFluconazoleTotal
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 44 years
1 participants4 participants5 participants
Age, Customized
Between 45 and 64 years
4 participants2 participants6 participants
Age, Customized
More than 65 years
4 participants2 participants6 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Feeling hot
4 participants4 participants8 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Fever
7 participants7 participants14 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Hypothermia
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Localized erythema
1 participants0 participants1 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Mechanical ventilation
1 participants1 participants2 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Other
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PCO2) decrease
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Purulence
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Respiratory rate increased
2 participants1 participants3 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Swelling
1 participants2 participants3 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
Tachycardia
3 participants2 participants5 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
White blood cell count decreased
2 participants0 participants2 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
White blood cell count increased
3 participants1 participants4 participants
Presence of Signs and Symptoms of Candidemia
White blood cell morphology abnormal
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants5 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 96 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 90 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)

Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were not available \[N/A\] for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat (MITT) population: participants had confirmed diagnosis of candidemia or other forms of invasive candidiasis, received at least 1 dose of study medication treatment, had at least 1 post-baseline efficacy evaluation. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)Success62.50 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)Failure37.50 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)Success71.43 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Intravenous Treatment (EOIT)Failure28.57 percentage of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Died

Time frame: Baseline to Day 52

Population: Safety population: All participants who have received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginNumber of Participants Who Died1 participants
FluconazoleNumber of Participants Who Died0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOIT

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITSuccess75.00 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITFailure25.00 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITSuccess71.43 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOITFailure28.57 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOT

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTSuccess75.00 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTFailure25.00 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTSuccess57.14 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at EOTFailure42.86 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-Up

Clinical response included success and failure. Success included Cure (resolution of signs and symptoms of the Candida infection) and Improvement (significant, but incomplete resolution of signs and symptoms of Candida infection). Failure defined as No significant improvement in signs and symptoms or death due to Candida infection or circumstances prevented an evaluation from being made.

Time frame: Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing data set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpFailure25.00 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpSuccess75.00 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpSuccess57.14 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Clinical Response at Follow-UpFailure42.86 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)

Global response included clinical and microbiological success or failure. Success - clinical success (defined as the resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of invasive candidiasis) and microbiological success (defined as the eradication of Candida species present at baseline, as determined on follow-up culture, or the presumed eradication, if culture data were N/A for a participant with a successful clinical response). Failure - Any case that did not meet the criteria for success.

Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Success62.50 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Failure37.50 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Success42.86 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Global Response at End of Treatment (EOT)Failure57.14 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOIT

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame: End of Intravenous Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITSuccess75.00 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITFailure25.00 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITSuccess85.71 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOITFailure14.29 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOT

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame: End of Treatment (Up to Day 42)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTSuccess75.00 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTFailure25.00 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTSuccess57.14 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at EOTFailure42.86 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-Up

Microbiological Success implies Eradication: culture negative for all Candida species present at baseline (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed). Microbiological Failure implies (1) Persistence: baseline Candida species present in repeat cultures (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); (2) Recurrence: baseline Candida species isolated following eradication (documented), or culture data N/A (presumed); or (3) Indeterminate: culture data N/A (loss to follow-up or death that was not due to candidiasis or candidemia).

Time frame: Post treatment follow-up visit (Up to Day 52)

Population: MITT population. N=number of participants with evaluable data; participants with missing or indeterminate data are set to Failure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpSuccess62.50 percentage of participants
AnidulafunginPercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpFailure37.50 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpSuccess57.14 percentage of participants
FluconazolePercentage of Participants With Microbiological Response at Follow-UpFailure42.86 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026