Skip to content

School-based Asthma Therapy: Stage 2 Effectiveness Study

School-Based Asthma Therapy: Stage 2 Effectiveness Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01175369
Acronym
SBAT
Enrollment
530
Registered
2010-08-04
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2012-01-31
Last updated
2014-08-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

Asthma

Brief summary

Asthma is the most common chronic illness of childhood, and hospitalization rates are increasing. In the US, impoverished children and children from minority ethnic and racial backgrounds suffer disproportionately from asthma. While National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) guidelines recommend daily preventive medications for all children with mild persistent to severe persistent asthma, studies indicate that many children in the US who should receive preventive medications are not receiving them. The overall goal of this project is to target an ethnically diverse population of inner-city schoolchildren with asthma and explore a school-based program to reduce asthma morbidity. We hypothesize that children receiving a comprehensive school-based intervention will experience less asthma-related morbidity compared to children receiving usual care. Our comprehensive school-based intervention consists of both administration of recommended preventive asthma medications in school (with dose adjustments according to NHLBI guidelines) and an environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) reduction program in the home for smoke-exposed children. Our secondary hypothesis is that, among the subgroup of smoke-exposed children, those who receive the school-based intervention with ETS reduction will experience less asthma morbidity than those who receive usual care.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSchool-based Care

The intervention includes directly observed administration of preventive medications in school and a home-based ETS reduction program (for those living with one or more smokers).

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Halcyon Hill Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
3 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Physician-diagnosed asthma * Mild persistent to severe persistent asthma * Ages 3-10 years * Attending school in the Rochester City School District preschools or elementary schools * Signed physician permission to enroll the child * Parent or caregiver must consent to the intervention

Exclusion criteria

* Inability to speak and understand either English or Spanish * No access to a working phone for follow-up surveys * The family planning to leave the school district within fewer than 6 months * The child having other significant medical conditions that could interfere with the assessment of asthma-related outcome measures * children in foster care or other situations in which consent cannot be obtained from a guardian * Current participation in other local asthma interventions

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Symptom Free DaysAverage Symptom Free Days, over 2 weeks, during peak asthma season (November-February)The primary outcome variable is the average number of symptom free days over 2 weeks assessed during peak asthma season (data collected during November, December, January and February during the school year).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cotinine Level2 month and approximately 9 month (end of school year) follow-up assessmentsTo test the effectiveness of the environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) reduction portion of the study, we will compare baseline cotinine values to 2 month (for smoke exposed participants) and final follow-up assessments (for all participants).
Cost Effectiveness of the Interventionapproximately 9 months (length of school year)Cost-effectiveness will examine the net program costs to the number of symptom-free days gained. Benefits will be described as the net difference in medical and productivity costs between children in the treatment and control groups.
Additional Asthma Morbidity Outcomes1-9 months (Monthly Follow-up assessments)We will look at additional asthma morbidity outcomes including symptom nights, days needing rescue medications, functional severity, days absent from school, and quality of life.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
Usual asthma care
265
School-based Care
The intervention includes directly observed administration of preventive medications in school and a home-based ETS reduction program (for those living with one or more smokers).
265
Total530

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSchool-based CareUsual CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
265 Participants265 Participants530 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
7.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
7.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9
Region of Enrollment
United States
265 participants265 participants530 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
104 Participants118 Participants222 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
161 Participants147 Participants308 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 2650 / 265
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2650 / 265

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Symptom Free Days

The primary outcome variable is the average number of symptom free days over 2 weeks assessed during peak asthma season (data collected during November, December, January and February during the school year).

Time frame: Average Symptom Free Days, over 2 weeks, during peak asthma season (November-February)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Usual CareNumber of Symptom Free Days10.7 DaysStandard Deviation 3.1
School-based CareNumber of Symptom Free Days11.6 DaysStandard Deviation 2.5
Secondary

Additional Asthma Morbidity Outcomes

We will look at additional asthma morbidity outcomes including symptom nights, days needing rescue medications, functional severity, days absent from school, and quality of life.

Time frame: 1-9 months (Monthly Follow-up assessments)

Secondary

Cost Effectiveness of the Intervention

Cost-effectiveness will examine the net program costs to the number of symptom-free days gained. Benefits will be described as the net difference in medical and productivity costs between children in the treatment and control groups.

Time frame: approximately 9 months (length of school year)

Secondary

Cotinine Level

To test the effectiveness of the environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) reduction portion of the study, we will compare baseline cotinine values to 2 month (for smoke exposed participants) and final follow-up assessments (for all participants).

Time frame: 2 month and approximately 9 month (end of school year) follow-up assessments

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026