Skip to content

Training of Patients With Hip Fracture

Strength Training of Patients With Hip Fracture - a Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01174589
Enrollment
100
Registered
2010-08-03
Start date
2010-09-30
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2014-08-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fracture

Keywords

Lower limb strength training, Randomized clinical trial, Patients with Hip fracture, 6 vs. 12 weeks physical strength training

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to illustrate whether there is a difference in the 6 minutes walking test in patients with hip fractures who have received 6 vs. 12 weeks of physical training after discharge from hospital.

Interventions

OTHERStrength training

to compare if there is a difference between 6 or 12 weeks of physical strength training

Sponsors

Association of Danish Physiotherapists
CollaboratorOTHER
Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
CollaboratorOTHER
Lolland Community, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with hip fractures * full weightbearing on the affected leg * patients living in their own home with an independent walking ability score \>=2 according to the New Mobility Score scale * written consent

Exclusion criteria

* institutionalized patients * more than 2 weeks after discharge from hospital * non weight bearing on the affected leg * Dementia * other conditions/diagnosis that would have an effect on the ability to train eg. neurological diagnosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the 6-minutes walking testat baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks (primary analysis) and 24 weeks after baseline testingThe 6-minutes walking test, performed according to international guidelines.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference of the Maximal isometric knee-extension strength of the fractured limb.Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testingThe best of 5 maximal isometric unilateral knee-extension strength tests of both limbs, measured with a fixated handheld dynamometer
Difference in 10-meter fast speed walking testAt baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline testingBest of 3 timed 10 meter fast speed walk tests.
Difference in the Timed Up & Go testAt baseline and 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testingBest of 3 timed TUG tests will be used.
Difference in the Short Form-36At baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testingThe Questionnaire will be filled out during an interview with the patient
Difference in the New Mobility ScoreAt baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testingThe questionnaire will be filled out during an interview with the patient.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the Barthel 0-20 points ADL-scoreAt baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testingThe questionnaire will be filled out during an interview with the patient
The Tandem Balance test 0-30 pointsAt baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks and 24 weeks after baseline testing

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 14, 2026