Skip to content

Pivotal Study (Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety) of BAX 326 (rFIX) in Hemophilia B Patients

Recombinant Factor IX (BAX 326): A Phase 1/3, Prospective, Controlled, Multicenter Study Evaluating Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity in Previously Treated Patients With Severe or Moderately Severe Hemophilia B

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01174446
Enrollment
86
Registered
2010-08-03
Start date
2010-07-29
Completion date
2012-05-03
Last updated
2021-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia B

Brief summary

The purpose of this pivotal Phase 1/3 study is to determine the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters, the hemostatic efficacy, and the safety of BAX 326, a recombinant factor IX, in previously treated patients (PTPs) with severe and moderately severe hemophilia B.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALBAX 326

* Study Part 1: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Crossover with BAX326 and BeneFIX * Study Part 2: Open-label evaluation of prophylaxis and on-demand BAX326 only * Study Part 3: Open-label repeat of PK evaluation (repeat Study Part 1) with BAX326 only and same study participants as Study Part 1

BIOLOGICALBeneFIX

* Study Part 1: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Crossover with BAX326 and BeneFIX. * BeneFIX only used in Part 1 of this study. * Study Part 2 and 3 only utilized BAX326

Sponsors

Baxalta now part of Shire
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Main Inclusion Criteria: * Participant is 12 to 65 years old at the time of screening * Participant and/or legal representative has/have provided signed informed consent * Participant has severe (factor IX (FIX) level \< 1%) or moderately severe (FIX level 1-2%) hemophilia B (based on the one stage activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) assay), as tested at screening at the central laboratory * Participant is previously treated with plasma-derived or recombinant FIX concentrate(s) for a minimum of 150 exposure days (EDs) (based on the participant's medical records); if a verifiable, documented history is unavailable, the participant can be enrolled if s/he has 100-150 EDs to any FIX product that are not fully documented and has participated in Study 050901 for at least 50 EDs to Immunine prior to enrollment (not valid for US and Japan). * Participant has no evidence of a history of FIX inhibitors * If the participant is to receive prophylactic treatment, the participant is willing to receive prophylactic treatment over a period of 6 months. * If the participant is to receive on-demand treatment, the participant has ≥12 documented bleeding episodes requiring treatment within 12 months prior to enrollment and is willing to receive on-demand treatment for the duration of this study. Main

Exclusion criteria

* The participant has a history of FIX inhibitors with a titer ≥0.6 Bethesda Units (BU) (as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay or the assay employed in the respective local laboratory) at any time prior to screening * The participant has a detectable FIX inhibitor at screening, with a titer ≥0.6 BU as determined by the Nijmegen modification of the Bethesda assay in the central laboratory * The participant's weight is \< 35 kg or \> 120 kg * The participant has a history of allergic reaction, eg, anaphylaxis, following exposure to FIX concentrate(s) * The participant has a known hypersensitivity to hamster proteins or recombinant furin (rFurin) * The participant has ongoing or recent evidence of a thrombotic disease, fibrinolysis or disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Study Part 1- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From 0 to 72 Hours Per Dose72 hoursComputed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Study Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusionComputed as Area under the moment curve 0-∞ (AUMC0-∞) / AUC0-∞- TI/2, where AUMC0-∞ will be determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration \[hr\] The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Study Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusionComputed as Dose/ AUC0-∞. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Study Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 1 hour post-infusionDefined as (Cmax - Cpre-infusion)/Dose, where maximum concentration (Cmax) will be determined as the highest concentration achieved within one hour after infusion. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusionIR at 30 Minutes was measured at the following time points during the study: - Part 1 or Part 2, Exposure Day (ED) 1. (If participant was present for Study Part 1, then ED 1 from Part 1 was used. If Participant entered study in Study Part 2, then ED 1 from Part 2 was used.) - Part 2: Week 5 - Part 2: Week 13 - Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26 (Week 26 of study participation) - Study Completion or Termination Visit
Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusionThe median changes in IR at 30 Minutes, calculated as the change in IR value from exposure day 1 (ED1).
Study Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusionElimination phase half-life will be determined as ln2/ λz. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Study Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusionVss computed as CL·MRT. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)ABR during prophylaxis (twice-weekly) in Part 2 was calculated as (Number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days) \* 365.25. The treatment period on prophylaxis was defined as time between the first and the last prophylactic infusions and ABR on prophylaxis was calculated for participants who received a minimum of 3 months of prophylactic treatment with BAX326.
Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseStudy Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Study Part 2 began at week 3-5)The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, or ≥3 infusions of BAX326 to achieve adequate hemostasis. Only infusions required until resolution of bleed were considered.
Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseAt bleed resolution throughout the study period of 22 months (Study Parts 1, 2, and 3)Rating Scale for Treatment of BEs (4-point ordinal scale): -Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding (eg, swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) after a single infusion. No additional infusion required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusions to maintain hemostasis did not affect this scoring. -Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -None: No improvement or condition worsens.
Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseStudy Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)
Consumption of BAX326 Per Event Per ParticipantStudy Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)Weight-adjusted consumption of BAX326 by event per participant, i.e., for prophylactic treatment and for treatment of bleeds until resolution of bleed.
Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Number of Infusions Per MonthStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Weight-adjusted Consumption Per MonthStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Occurrence of total binding antibodies of indeterminate specificity (within assay variability) to FIX, antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin is defined by a dilution of 2 or less increase as compared to levels at screening visit (e.g. negative to 1:20 or 1:40).
Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding AntibodiesStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Occurrence of treatment related total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX), antibodies to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) proteins, and recombinant furin (rFurin) is defined by more than 2-dilution increase as compared to levels at screening visit and confirmed specificity (e.g. negative to 1:80)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Severe Allergic Reactions (e.g. Anaphylaxis)Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants Who Experienced Thrombotic EventsStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Clinical ChemistryStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Clinically significant changes in chemistry assessments for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bicarbonate, Bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Protein (Serum), Sodium. Clinically Significant (CS) defined as: -1. The abnormal value constitutes an adverse event (AE) and, -2. The abnormal value is a symptom of or related to a disease that is already recorded as an AE in Case Report Form (CRF).
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: HematologyStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Clinically significant changes in hematology assessments for Basophils, Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils/Leukocytes, Platelets,
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Vital SignsStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Clinically significant changes in vital signs assessments for pulse rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Thrombogenic MarkersStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)Clinically significant changes in thrombogenic markers assessments for thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), prothrombin fragment 1.2, and D-dimer as evaluated by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index ScoresBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome.
EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) ScoresBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better quality of life.
General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Participant rated assessment of health-related quality of life. The VAS Pain Scale rates current health state on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.
Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The PCS is a summary scale of the dimensions physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health. The component score is normalized to a standard population. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores.
SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Role-EmotionalBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Bodily PainBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Mental HealthBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL VitalityBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL Social FunctioningBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
SF-36: HRQoL General HealthBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.
Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoLBaseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The Haem-A-QOL instrument has been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. For the Haem-A-QOL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.
Study Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusionDefined as (AUC0-t + Ct)/ λz/ dose, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. λz will be estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.
Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital StayStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolStudy Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)The Haemo-QoL is a quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument for children and adolescents with haemophilia. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. For the Haemo-QoL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Countries

Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, Colombia, Czechia, Japan, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Ukraine, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Enrollment was conducted at 29 clinical sites in South America, Europe, and Japan.

Pre-assignment details

86 enrolled. 1 withdrew consent prior to randomization. -31 were enrolled and randomized in Parts 1-3. Prior to receiving study drug: 3 discontinued by participant. -Part 2 an additional 54 were enrolled. Prior to receiving study drug: 3 discontinued by participant, 1 withdrew due to an AE, 2 screen failures, and 3 withdrew due to site closure.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants Who Received Study Drug
BAX326 : -Study Part 1: Pharmacokinetic (PK) Crossover with BAX326 and BeneFIX -Study Part 2: Open-label evaluation of prophylaxis and on-demand BAX326 only -Study Part 3: Open-label repeat of PK evaluation (repeat Study Part 1) with BAX326 only and same study participants as Study Part 1
73
Total73

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Part 2 -BAX326 Prophylaxis and On-demandPhysician Decision0010
Part 2 -BAX326 Prophylaxis and On-demandWithdrawal by Subject0010
Part 3 -Pharmacokinetic BAX326 OnlyProtocol Violation1000
Part 3 -Pharmacokinetic BAX326 OnlyRequired Emergency Surgery0100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants Who Received Study Drug
Age, Continuous34.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Brazil
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Colombia
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Czech Republic
2 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Romania
8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Russian Federation
12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
8 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
73 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
15 / 73
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 73

Outcome results

Primary

Study Part 1- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From 0 to 72 Hours Per Dose

Computed using the linear trapezoidal method. The concentration at 72 hours was interpolated from the two nearest sampling time points or extrapolated using the last quantifiable concentration and the terminal rate constant λz. λz was estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2.

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Part 1- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From 0 to 72 Hours Per Dose14.30 (IU·hr/dL) / (IU/kg)
BeneFIXStudy Part 1- Area Under the Plasma Concentration Versus Time Curve From 0 to 72 Hours Per Dose13.42 (IU·hr/dL) / (IU/kg)
90% CI: [1.03, 1.09]
Secondary

Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause

The number of bleeding episodes treated with 1, 2, or ≥3 infusions of BAX326 to achieve adequate hemostasis. Only infusions required until resolution of bleed were considered.

Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Study Part 2 began at week 3-5)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions26 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions16 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion65 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions21 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion57 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions12 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion122 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions28 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions47 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions11 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion31 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Bleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions10 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions29 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion84 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions17 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions24 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion50 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions16 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause1 infusion19 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause3 or more infusions5 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownBleeding Episodes Treated With 1, 2 or ≥3 Infusions of BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause2 infusions5 Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time

The median changes in IR at 30 Minutes, calculated as the change in IR value from exposure day 1 (ED1).

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.03 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
BeneFIXChange in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.075 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Study Part 3: BAX326Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.06 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Change in Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.12 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Secondary

Consumption of BAX326 Per Event Per Participant

Weight-adjusted consumption of BAX326 by event per participant, i.e., for prophylactic treatment and for treatment of bleeds until resolution of bleed.

Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Consumption of BAX326 Per Event Per Participant50.5 IU/kg
BeneFIXConsumption of BAX326 Per Event Per Participant87.1 IU/kg
Secondary

Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Number of Infusions Per Month

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Number of Infusions Per Month6.7 Infusions
BeneFIXConsumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Number of Infusions Per Month2.7 Infusions
Secondary

Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Weight-adjusted Consumption Per Month

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Prophylaxis and On-Demand period), Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Consumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Weight-adjusted Consumption Per Month347.8 IU/kg
BeneFIXConsumption of BAX326 Per Participant: Median Weight-adjusted Consumption Per Month167.3 IU/kg
Secondary

EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores

EQ-5D is a participant answered questionnaire scoring 5 dimensions - mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D total score ranges from 0 (worst health state) to 1 (perfect health state) and 1 reflects the best outcome.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
BeneFIXEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.16
Study Part 3: BAX326EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.01 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.18
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.14
Study Completion or Termination VisitEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.73 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
Bleeding Cause: InjuryEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Total Index Scores0.00 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.13
p-value: 0.779Paired t-test
p-value: 0.8999Paired t-test
Secondary

EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores

Participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores58.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.89
BeneFIXEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores68.22 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.78
Study Part 3: BAX326EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores9.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.41
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26EuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores56.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.97
Study Completion or Termination VisitEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores62.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19
Bleeding Cause: InjuryEuroQoL (Quality of Life)-5 Dimensions Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS) Scores5.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.02
p-value: 0.0056Paired t-test
p-value: 0.413Paired t-test
Secondary

General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Participant rated assessment of health-related quality of life. The VAS Pain Scale rates current health state on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst imaginable pain). For the pain scale, a higher score indicates worse pain.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)32.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.62
BeneFIXGeneral Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)33.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.9
Study Part 3: BAX326General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)0.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.77
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26General Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)47.57 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.82
Study Completion or Termination VisitGeneral Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)39.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.57
Bleeding Cause: InjuryGeneral Pain Assessment Through a Visual Analog Scale (VAS)-7.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.58
p-value: 0.9059Paired t-test
p-value: 0.4098Paired t-test
Secondary

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL

The Haem-A-QOL instrument has been developed and used in hemophilia A patients. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. The areas covered by this instrument are: physical health, sports/leisure, school/work, dealing with hemophilia, and outlook for the future. For the Haem-A-QOL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL40.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.33
BeneFIXHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL37.85 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.57
Study Part 3: BAX326Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL-3.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.81
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL41.65 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.19
Study Completion or Termination VisitHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL41.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.64
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haem-A-QoL-0.28 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.18
p-value: 0.0633Paired t-test
p-value: 0.9363Paired t-test
Secondary

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)

The Haemo-QoL is a quality of life (QoL) assessment instrument for children and adolescents with haemophilia. As a hemophilia-specific instrument, this measure assesses very specific aspects of dealing with hemophilia. For the Haemo-QoL, higher scores indicate a worse quality of life. Scores on a scale range between 0 and 100.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
BAX326Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)40.00 Score on a scale
BeneFIXHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)40.00 Score on a scale
Study Part 3: BAX326Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Disease-specific: Haemo-QoL - Participants On-Demand (Ages 12-16)0.00 Score on a scale
Secondary

Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or School

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 3 (N= 25, NA)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)0.0 Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)NA Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)NA Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)NA Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 3 (N= 25, NA)NA Days
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Days Lost From Work or SchoolPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Days
Secondary

Health Resource Use - Emergency Room Visits

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Emergency Room VisitsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Visits
Secondary

Health Resource Use - Number of Hospitalizations

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Hospitalizations
BAX326Health Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)0.0 Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)NA Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)NA Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)NA Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)NA Hospitalizations
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Number of HospitalizationsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Hospitalizations
Secondary

Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital Stay

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital StayPart 2: Week 5 (N= 1)46.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital StayPart 2: Week 13 (N= 1)23.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital StayPart 3 (N= 3)2.0 Days
BAX326Health Resource Use - Total Days of Hospital StayCompletion/Termination (N= 2)5.5 Days
Secondary

Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office Visits

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Visits
BAX326Health Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)1.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsUnscheduled Study Visit (N= 1, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 1 - Pharmacokinetics (N= 28, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 26 (N= 30, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Exposure Day 1 (N= 31, 14)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsCompletion/Termination (N= 20, 9)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 5 (N= 57, 14)0.0 Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 3 (N= 25, NA)NA Visits
BeneFIXHealth Resource Use - Unscheduled Doctor's Office VisitsPart 2: Week 13 (N= 56, 12)0.0 Visits
Secondary

Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause

Rating Scale for Treatment of BEs (4-point ordinal scale): -Excellent: Full relief of pain and cessation of objective signs of bleeding (eg, swelling, tenderness, and decreased range of motion in the case of musculoskeletal hemorrhage) after a single infusion. No additional infusion required for the control of bleeding. Administration of further infusions to maintain hemostasis did not affect this scoring. -Good: Definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding after a single infusion. Possibly requires more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -Fair: Probable and/or slight relief of pain and slight improvement in signs of bleeding after single infusion. Required more than 1 infusion for complete resolution. -None: No improvement or condition worsens.

Time frame: At bleed resolution throughout the study period of 22 months (Study Parts 1, 2, and 3)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair5 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent53 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported3 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood46 Bleeding episodes
BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair0 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood57 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent32 Bleeding episodes
BeneFIXHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported1 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported4 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood103 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent85 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair5 Bleeding episodes
Study Part 3: BAX326Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair0 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent17 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood34 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Hemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported1 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent51 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported2 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair2 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
Study Completion or Termination VisitHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood75 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent40 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported3 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood45 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: InjuryHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair2 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNone0 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseGood17 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseFair1 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseExcellent11 Bleeding episodes
Bleeding Cause: UnknownHemostatic Efficacy at Resolution of All Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and CauseNot Reported0 Bleeding episodes
Secondary

Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time

IR at 30 Minutes was measured at the following time points during the study: - Part 1 or Part 2, Exposure Day (ED) 1. (If participant was present for Study Part 1, then ED 1 from Part 1 was used. If Participant entered study in Study Part 2, then ED 1 from Part 2 was used.) - Part 2: Week 5 - Part 2: Week 13 - Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26 (Week 26 of study participation) - Study Completion or Termination Visit

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion and 30 minutes post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.78 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
BeneFIXIncremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.79 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Study Part 3: BAX326Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.83 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Incremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.88 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Study Completion or Termination VisitIncremental Recovery (IR) at 30 Minutes Over Time0.89 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Secondary

Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 Treatment

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Mild1 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Moderate1 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Severe3 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Unknown0 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Mild63 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Moderate17 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Severe1 adverse events
BAX326Number of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Unknown1 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Unknown1 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Mild0 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Mild2 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Moderate0 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Severe0 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Severe0 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Moderate0 adverse events
BeneFIXNumber of Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Unknown0 adverse events
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants Who Developed Inhibitory Antibodies to Factor IX (FIX)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Severe Allergic Reactions (e.g. Anaphylaxis)

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants Who Experienced Severe Allergic Reactions (e.g. Anaphylaxis)0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Experienced Thrombotic Events

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants Who Experienced Thrombotic Events0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 Treatment

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, and Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Mild1 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Mild33 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Severe2 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Moderate9 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Moderate1 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Severe1 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Unknown0 participants
BAX326Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Unknown1 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Unknown0 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Mild0 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Moderate0 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentSerious- Severe0 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Unknown1 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Mild1 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Moderate0 participants
BeneFIXNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) After BAX326 TreatmentNon-Serious- Severe0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry

Clinically significant changes in chemistry assessments for Alanine Aminotransferase, Albumin, Alkaline Phosphatase, Aspartate Aminotransferase, Bicarbonate, Bilirubin, Blood Urea Nitrogen, Chloride, Glucose, Potassium, Protein (Serum), Sodium. Clinically Significant (CS) defined as: -1. The abnormal value constitutes an adverse event (AE) and, -2. The abnormal value is a symptom of or related to a disease that is already recorded as an AE in Case Report Form (CRF).

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Clinical Chemistry0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Hematology

Clinically significant changes in hematology assessments for Basophils, Basophils/Leukocytes, Eosinophils, Eosinophils/Leukocytes, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration, Erythrocyte Mean Corpuscular Volume, Erythrocytes, Hematocrit, Hemoglobin, Leukocytes, Lymphocytes, Lymphocytes/Leukocytes, Monocytes, Monocytes/Leukocytes, Neutrophils, Neutrophils/Leukocytes, Platelets,

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Hematology0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Thrombogenic Markers

Clinically significant changes in thrombogenic markers assessments for thrombin-antithrombin (TAT), prothrombin fragment 1.2, and D-dimer as evaluated by an independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Thrombogenic Markers0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Vital Signs

Clinically significant changes in vital signs assessments for pulse rate, systolic/diastolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, body temperature

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Laboratory Parameters: Vital Signs0 participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)

Occurrence of total binding antibodies of indeterminate specificity (within assay variability) to FIX, antibodies to CHO proteins and rFurin is defined by a dilution of 2 or less increase as compared to levels at screening visit (e.g. negative to 1:20 or 1:40).

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)Binding Antibody to Factor IX (FIX)6 participants
BAX326Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)Antibody to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) Protein0 participants
BAX326Occurrence of Total Binding Antibodies of Indeterminate Specificity (Within Assay Variability)Antibody to recombinant Furin (rFurin)9 participants
Secondary

Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding Antibodies

Occurrence of treatment related total binding antibodies to Factor IX (FIX), antibodies to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) proteins, and recombinant furin (rFurin) is defined by more than 2-dilution increase as compared to levels at screening visit and confirmed specificity (e.g. negative to 1:80)

Time frame: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks, Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week, Study Part 3 = 1 week (Total = 29-31 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
BAX326Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding AntibodiesBinding Antibody to Factor IX (FIX)0 participants
BAX326Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding AntibodiesAntibody to Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) Protein0 participants
BAX326Occurrence of Treatment Related Total Binding AntibodiesAntibody to recombinant Furin (rFurin)0 participants
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)

The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)65.63 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.26
BeneFIXPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)54.69 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.63
Study Part 3: BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)-10.94 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.89
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)65.63 Score on a scale
Study Completion or Termination VisitPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)65.63 Score on a scale
Bleeding Cause: InjuryPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Physical Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)0.00 Score on a scale
p-value: 0.5792Paired t-test
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)

The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)63.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.79
BeneFIXPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)55.83 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.54
Study Part 3: BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)-7.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.25
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)88.33 Score on a scale
Study Completion or Termination VisitPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)86.67 Score on a scale
Bleeding Cause: InjuryPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Psychosocial Health Summary Score (Ages 12-16)-1.67 Score on a scale
p-value: 0.4208Paired t-test
Secondary

Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)

The Peds-QL is a generic Health-Related Quality of Life (HR QoL) instrument designed specifically for a pediatric population. It captures the following domains: general health/activities, feelings/emotional, social functioning, school functioning. For this study, the Peds-QL for 12 to 16-year-old subjects was used. Higher scores indicate better quality of life (QOL) for all domains of the Peds-QL. This modular instrument uses a 5-point scale: from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). Items are reversed scored and linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. 4 dimensions (physical, emotional, social, & school functioning) are scored.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)64.13 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
BeneFIXPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)55.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Study Part 3: BAX326Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)-8.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Pediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)80.43 Score on a scale
Study Completion or Termination VisitPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)79.35 Score on a scale
Bleeding Cause: InjuryPediatric Quality of Life Questionnaire (PedsQL) Total Score (Ages 12-16)-1.09 Score on a scale
p-value: 0.5Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain42.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.21
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain45.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.68
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain3.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.95
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain36.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.84
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain39.33 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.91
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Bodily Pain2.44 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.18
p-value: 0.0146Paired t-test
p-value: 0.4048Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL General Health

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL General Health37.84 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.38
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL General Health39.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.03
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL General Health2.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.22
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL General Health37.09 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.47
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL General Health39.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL General Health1.98 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.94
p-value: 0.0562Paired t-test
p-value: 0.3864Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Mental Health

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Mental Health45.52 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.78
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Mental Health47.95 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.84
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Mental Health2.44 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.29
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Mental Health45.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.57
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Mental Health42.64 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.63
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Mental Health-2.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
p-value: 0.1258Paired t-test
p-value: 0.2567Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)47.53 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.46
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)49.67 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.3
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)2.01 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.17
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)47.24 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.8
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)45.03 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.96
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL 'Mental Health' (MH)-2.21 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.28
p-value: 0.2009Paired t-test
p-value: 0.3552Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)40.20 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.57
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)40.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.14
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)0.68 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.48
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)40.04 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.57
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)39.87 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.55
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Physical Functioning' (PF)-0.16 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
p-value: 0.5143Paired t-test
p-value: 0.9223Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional44.22 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.45
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional44.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.15
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional0.37 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional40.93 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.1
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional39.43 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.57
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Role-Emotional-1.50 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.91
p-value: 0.821Paired t-test
p-value: 0.5565Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)40.39 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.7
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)43.82 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.67
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)3.47 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.15
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)39.15 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.13
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)37.45 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.12
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Role-Physical (RP)-1.70 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.86
p-value: 0.0162Paired t-test
p-value: 0.3176Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning41.80 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.54
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning44.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.94
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning2.78 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.78
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning43.42 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.61
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning42.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.8
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Social Functioning-1.26 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.36
p-value: 0.0663Paired t-test
p-value: 0.489Paired t-test
Secondary

SF-36: HRQoL Vitality

Quality of life survey response as measured using the SF-36 questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores. The raw data from the SF-36 items were transformed to norm based scores for each of the 8 HRQoL/SF-36 health domain scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Vitality50.07 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.47
BeneFIXSF-36: HRQoL Vitality52.75 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.88
Study Part 3: BAX326SF-36: HRQoL Vitality2.46 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.75
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26SF-36: HRQoL Vitality50.17 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.63
Study Completion or Termination VisitSF-36: HRQoL Vitality50.89 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.81
Bleeding Cause: InjurySF-36: HRQoL Vitality0.72 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.43
p-value: 0.1048Paired t-test
p-value: 0.641Paired t-test
Secondary

Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)

The PCS is a summary scale of the dimensions physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and general health. The component score is normalized to a standard population. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores representing better health. There is no total overall score; scoring is done for both subscores and summary scores.

Time frame: Baseline at either Study Part 1, or Study Part 2, and End of Study (study weeks 29-31)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
BAX326Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)39.08 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.39
BeneFIXShort Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)41.35 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.73
Study Part 3: BAX326Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)2.60 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.72
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)37.38 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.2
Study Completion or Termination VisitShort Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)38.92 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.53
Bleeding Cause: InjuryShort Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36): HRQoL 'Physical Component Score' (PCS)1.54 Score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.11
p-value: 0.0189Paired t-test
p-value: 0.2974Paired t-test
Secondary

Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326

ABR during prophylaxis (twice-weekly) in Part 2 was calculated as (Number of bleeding episodes/observed treatment period in days) \* 365.25. The treatment period on prophylaxis was defined as time between the first and the last prophylactic infusions and ABR on prophylaxis was calculated for participants who received a minimum of 3 months of prophylactic treatment with BAX326.

Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set - Prophylactic cohort

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Joint bleeding episode0.00 Bleeds per year
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Non-Joint bleeding episode0.00 Bleeds per year
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Spontaneous bleeding episode0.00 Bleeds per year
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Bleeding episode caused by injury0.00 Bleeds per year
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326Unknown cause of bleeding episode0.00 Bleeds per year
BAX326Study Part 2: Annualized Bleed Rate (ABR) During Treatment With BAX326All bleeding episodes1.99 Bleeds per year
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)

Defined as (AUC0-t + Ct)/ λz/ dose, where t is the time of last quantifiable concentration, Ct is the last quantifiable concentration. λz will be estimated from the slope of natural log-linear fitting to latter quantifiable concentrations, with largest adjusted R\^2. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)16.07 (IU·hr)/ dL/ (IU/kg)
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)15.26 (IU·hr)/ dL/ (IU/kg)
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Area Under the Plasma Concentration/Time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity Per Dose (AUC0-∞/ Dose)17.38 (IU·hr)/ dL/ (IU/kg)
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)

Computed as Dose/ AUC0-∞. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)0.0622 dL/(kg·hr)
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)0.0655 dL/(kg·hr)
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Clearance (CL)0.0576 dL/(kg·hr)
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)

Elimination phase half-life will be determined as ln2/ λz. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)24.58 Hour
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)26.28 Hour
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Half Life (T 1/2)24.59 Hour
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)

Defined as (Cmax - Cpre-infusion)/Dose, where maximum concentration (Cmax) will be determined as the highest concentration achieved within one hour after infusion. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 1 hour post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)0.88 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)0.73 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Incremental Recovery at Cmax (IR at Cmax)0.93 (IU/dL) / (IU/kg)
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)

Computed as Area under the moment curve 0-∞ (AUMC0-∞) / AUC0-∞- TI/2, where AUMC0-∞ will be determined in a similar manner as AUC0-∞ and TI represents infusion duration \[hr\] The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)28.93 Hour
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)30.59 Hour
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Mean Residence Time (MRT)29.04 Hour
Secondary

Study Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)

Vss computed as CL·MRT. The objective of Study Part 3 was to re-evaluate the Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters for BAX 326 after a period of 6 months of treatment, in participants who accumulated at least 30 EDs to BAX 326, and to compare them with those determined in the same participants participating in Study Part 1.

Time frame: 0-30 minutes before infusion up to 72 hours post-infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic Per Protocol Analysis Set (PKPPAS) -Participants who participated in Study Parts 1-3 and completed Study Part 1 without any major protocol deviations

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)1.72 dL/kg
BeneFIXStudy Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)1.98 dL/kg
Study Part 3: BAX326Study Parts 1 and 3: Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss)1.74 dL/kg
Secondary

Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause

Time frame: Study Part 2 = 26 weeks ± 1 week (Note: Study Part 1 = 2-4 weeks)

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
BAX326Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause56.5 IU/kg
BeneFIXTotal Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause59.0 IU/kg
Study Part 3: BAX326Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause56.5 IU/kg
Part 2 or Part 3: Week 26Total Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause68.7 IU/kg
Study Completion or Termination VisitTotal Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause52.3 IU/kg
Bleeding Cause: InjuryTotal Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause70.0 IU/kg
Bleeding Cause: UnknownTotal Weight-adjusted Dose Per Bleeding Episode (BEs) of All BEs Treated With BAX326 by Bleeding Site and Cause56.5 IU/kg

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026