Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Effects of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional MRI in Patients With Fibromyalgia

A Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-controlled, Two-way Crossover Study to Evaluate the Effect of Milnacipran on Pain Processing and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Activation Patterns in Patients With Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01173055
Enrollment
22
Registered
2010-07-30
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2012-06-30
Last updated
2017-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Brief summary

Fibromyalgia is a condition that includes pain, tenderness, stiff muscle, and fatigue. Researchers want to find out if a drug called milnacipran can help people with fibromyalgia. milnacipran (Savella) is approved by the FDA for the management of fibromyalgia. In this study, milnacipran will be given to find out more about how it affects pain and thinking in people with fibromyalgia.

Detailed description

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of milnacipran on pain processing in patients with fibromyalgia and to assess the correlation between this effect and neural activation patterns during functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). NOTE regarding Changes in Outcome Measures In this Crossover Study, participants were involved for approximately 16 weeks in this sequence: a week of preparing for the initial assessments, baseline measurements (Week 0), 6 weeks on placebo or study drug followed by measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 6); a week of titration off of drug, if appropriate (or continued placebo, if on placebo), two weeks of washout, a new baseline assessment (Week 9), six weeks of study drug (or placebo), another set of measurements for effect of drug or placebo (Week 15), and a final titration period to maintain masking of assignment to drug or placebo. Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable. When Outcome measure data was originally and accurately posted for baseline and change after treatment, the time frames listed were 0 and 15 weeks, because the last assessment was gathered at approximately week 15 for each person whose data is in the data set. However, given the crossover design, it seems more accurate and understandable, to show the time frame for the outcome measure as 6 because the participants were each administered drug or placebo for six weeks total. (Of course for the Placebo then Study Drug arm, the placebo data was collected at week 6, and for the Study Drug then Placebo arm, the drug data was collected at week 6, and similarly for the first group the drug data was collected at week 15 (first assignment, plus 1 week titration, 2 weeks washout, new baseline at week 9, and final collection at week 15), and for the second group the placebo data was collected at week 15. Thus, outcome measures originally listed for 6 and 9 weeks, which were previously shown as Data Not Reported were effectively already included within the data presented for change from baseline shown in Week 15 in this fashion: 9 week data for the second assignment is part of the week 0 data for the first assignment, to get pre-treatment baseline for each treatment shown. Week 6 data is the post-treatment data which was shown as week 15, but is now recategorized as 6 week data. There is no, and never was, any data that could represent assignment to drug or placebo for 9 or 15 weeks. Additionally, several outcome measures based on fMRI values were always listed in the protocol as other outcomes (not secondary outcomes), but had been incorrectly posted in the earlier listings on ClinicalTrials.gov. They have been accurately reclassified in the 2017 resubmission.

Interventions

DRUGmilnacipran

Milnacipran will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study.

Sponsors

Forest Laboratories
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Michigan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* You may be eligible to take part in this study if the following are true: * You are between the age of 18 and 70 years * If you are female * If you are right handed * You have a diagnosis of fibromyalgia for at least 3 months, as defined by the American College of Rheumatology 1990 Criteria * You are willing to stop taking certain medicines that you may be taking on a regular basis. The researchers will discuss these medications with you in detail

Exclusion criteria

* You may not be eligible take part in this study if any of the following are true for you: * You have problems with your heart or cardiovascular system * You have problems with your liver or kidneys * You have an autoimmune disease, or a whole-body infection like HIV or hepatitis * You have cancer * You are pregnant or breastfeeding * You abuse drugs or alcohol * You have suicidal thoughts or wishes * You have taken milnacipran or another study drug within the last 30 days * You have a medical problem not listed here that would make it unsafe for you to take part in the study * The research team feels that you will be unable to complete all phases of the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Threshold at BaselineBaselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatmentThe primary outcome parameter is the medium pressure pain threshold at pre-treatment baseline (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale). Measured in kg/cm\^2.
Change in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatmentThe primary outcome parameter is the change in medium pressure pain threshold (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm\^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.
Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.
Pain Tolerance at BaselineBaselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatmentThe primary outcome parameter is the pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) at pre-treatment baseline.
Change in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of Treatmentbaseline compared wtih 6 weeks of treatmentThe primary outcome parameter is the change in pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm\^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Change in Descending Pain Modulation From Baseline to End of Treatment (as Assessed by Changes in fMRI Brainstem Activation Patterns)Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Change in fMRI Brain Activation Patterns During Pressure Stimulation From Baseline to End of TreatmentBaselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later
Change in fMRI Activation Patterns During N-back Procedure From Baseline to End of Treatment.Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants enrolled in the study received placebo for 1 week (Day -7 to 0) then began the double blinded treatment sequence.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Milnacipran First, Then Placebo
Milnacipran and placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day. milnacipran, then placebo: Milnacipran and placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.
6
Placebo First, Then Milnacipran
Milnacipran and placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day. Placebo, then milnacipran: Milnacipran and placebo will be given orally twice daily in tablet form at different times during the course of the study. The highest dose of milnacipran to be used in the study is 200mg/day.
9
Total15

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1 - Day 1 to 49Withdrawal by Subject22
Period 2 - Day 64 to 112Adverse Event01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMilnacipran First, Then PlaceboPlacebo First, Then MilnacipranTotal
Age, Customized
Fibromyalgia
46.83 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.83
36.67 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.64
40.73 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.187
Region of Enrollment
United States
6 participants9 participants15 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Female
6 participants9 participants15 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 2011 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 200 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.

The primary outcome parameter is the change in medium pressure pain threshold (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm\^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment

Population: Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.Pre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)2.7333 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.83166
MilnacipranChange in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.Post-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)2.650 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.05982
PlaceboChange in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.Pre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)2.583 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.84339
PlaceboChange in Pain Threshold From Baseline to End of Treatment.Post-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)2.70 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.99642
Primary

Pain Threshold at Baseline

The primary outcome parameter is the medium pressure pain threshold at pre-treatment baseline (pressure that evokes a perceived pain intensity of 40-50 out of 100 on a numerical rating scale). Measured in kg/cm\^2.

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranPain Threshold at Baseline2.7333 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.83166
PlaceboPain Threshold at Baseline2.583 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 0.84339
Secondary

Change in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.

0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline compared with 6 weeks of treatment

Population: Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable. On the placebo, side one additional participant did not have data for this variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.Pre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)8.134 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.51978
MilnacipranChange in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.Post-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)11.0355 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.16822
PlaceboChange in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.Pre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)12.0240 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.80824
PlaceboChange in Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect From Baseline to End of Treatment.Post-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)8.50 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.6678
Secondary

Change in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of Treatment

The primary outcome parameter is the change in pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) from baseline to end of treatment. Measured in kg/cm\^2. Lower values represent a worse outcome.

Time frame: baseline compared wtih 6 weeks of treatment

Population: Of 17 participants who completed both sequences, data was analyzed for the 15 whose values for all measurement variables were usable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranChange in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of TreatmentPre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)4.2667 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.39983
MilnacipranChange in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of TreatmentPost-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)3.8667 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.43261
PlaceboChange in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of TreatmentPre-Treatment (Week 0 or 9)3.80 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.17716
PlaceboChange in Pain Tolerance From Baseline to End of TreatmentPost-Treatment (Week 6 or 15)3.8667 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.20218
Secondary

Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.

0-100 numerical rating scale. 0 on the numerical scale represents a better outcome. 100 represents a worse outcome.

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

Population: One participant did not complete this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranDiffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.8.134 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.51978
PlaceboDiffuse Noxious Inhibitory Control (DNIC) Effect at Baseline.12.0240 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.80824
Secondary

Pain Tolerance at Baseline

The primary outcome parameter is the pressure pain tolerance (maximum tolerated pressure) at pre-treatment baseline.

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MilnacipranPain Tolerance at Baseline4.2667 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.39983
PlaceboPain Tolerance at Baseline3.80 kg/cm^2Standard Deviation 1.17716
Other Pre-specified

Change in Descending Pain Modulation From Baseline to End of Treatment (as Assessed by Changes in fMRI Brainstem Activation Patterns)

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later

Other Pre-specified

Change in fMRI Activation Patterns During N-back Procedure From Baseline to End of Treatment.

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later

Other Pre-specified

Change in fMRI Brain Activation Patterns During Pressure Stimulation From Baseline to End of Treatment

Time frame: Baselines measured at week 0 and week 9 after washout from first assignment to treatment; treatment effect measures collected 6 weeks later

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026