Skip to content

Evaluation of the EZ Blocker

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial for Single-Lung-Ventilation Comparing Double-Lume Tube and the EZ-Blocker®

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01171560
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-07-28
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2010-08-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Intubation, One-lung Ventilation, Thoracic Surgery

Keywords

EZ Blocker, Double-lumen Tube, Airway, thoracic surgery, time for intubation, blind insertion, conditions of surgery, postoperative sore throat, postoperative hoarseness

Brief summary

In anesthetized patients the airway needs to be secured due to lack of protective reflexes. Golden standard is the endotracheal intubation. In patients undergoing lung surgery single lung ventilation is essential. In these cases a double lume tube is commonly used. The double lume tube has a proximal tracheal and a distal bronchial end reaching into the left or the right side of the lung dependant of the model of the tube. Thus it is possible to operate on one collapsed side of the lung while ventilating the other side. Due to length and stiffness resulting of the construction of the device more side effects than after intubation with a conventional single lumen tube is expected. Possible side effects may be bleeding, swelling, sore throat or croakiness. The EZ-Blocker is a new device promising to overcome these side effects. The EZ-Blocker is a device placing a balloon into one bronchus to be able to provide single lung ventilation like the double lume tube. However, the EZ-Blocker is a catheter pushed through a conventional single lume tube after intubation with a hook on one and a balloon on the other distal end. The hook prevents the device from being pushed too far to be able to harm the lung. Inside the EZ-Blocker is a small lumen able to deflate the lung which is blocked with the balloon. The device is easily positioned using a bronchoscope and when the anaesthesiologists confirmed the correct position of the device, the balloon can be inflated and deflated as needed. Due to the easier approach the investigators expect less side effects as mentioned earlier using the EZ-Blocker compared to the double lume tube. As well the stress caused by intubation may be reduced.

Interventions

PROCEDUREendotracheal intubation

The patients will be randomized to one of two groups: EZ Blocker or conventional double lume tube. After induction of anesthesia, intubation using respective device will be performed in dorsal position.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgery * thoracic surgery with requiring single lung ventilation in lateral position * ASA Status 1-3 * Oral and written consent to participation * Age 18- 90

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications against placing a double lume tube, like tracheal lesions, etc. * Thoracic surgery within the last four weeks * Any form of infection (Pneumonia, Pleural empyema) or suspected Tbc * BMI higher than 45 * Patients with a previous diagnoses or suspected difficult airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time from intubation to ventilation:5 minutesis intubation and achieving lung separation faster using a conventional double-lung-tube or using the EZ-Blocker ?

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative sore throat or croakiness2 minutesDocumentation of sore throat and croakiness by questioning the patients the day after surgery
resistance to dislocation10 minutesWhich device, double-lung-tube or EZ-Blocker, is more resistant to dislocation in endotracheal/endobronchial position, especially when the patient is moved from dorsal to lateral position?
Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2)3 hoursDecrease of Peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) (in min) under 90% during the hole surgery

Countries

Austria

Contacts

Primary ContactKurt Rützler, M.D.
kurt.ruetzler@meduniwien.ac.at00436643855257

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 29, 2026