Skip to content

Predictors of Response to Augmentation With Ziprasidone (Geodon®) in Major Depressive Disorder

Predictors of Response to Augmentation With Ziprasidone (Geodon®) in Major Depressive Disorder : A 13-week, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Cross-Over Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01168674
Enrollment
49
Registered
2010-07-23
Start date
2010-02-28
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2017-02-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bipolar Disorder, Depression

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder, MDD, Bipolar Disorder, BD, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder with Bipolar features

Brief summary

The primary outcome of this study is to determine if predictors of response can select a population of patients with MDD that is effectively treatable by augmentation with ziprasidone. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a broad category, including many forms of depressive illness, including those with only a single major depressive episode, those with episodic recurrence with intervening well states, those with chronic depressive/anxious states without intervening euthymia, and those with manic symptoms that do not meet threshold definitions of full mania/hypomania. In this heterogenous, large diagnostic definition, important groups of patients do not appear to respond well to antidepressants, and, conversely, based on observational studies, may respond well to neuroleptics. These predictors of response have begun to be identified and may serve to better design studies of neuroleptics in depressive illnesses. Among these predictors of response in MDD are clinical features that are more similar to bipolar illness than unipolar depression. These include a family history of bipolar disorder, antidepressant-induced mania, highly recurrent depressive episodes (\>5), atypical depression, early age of onset of depression (\< age 20), failure to respond to antidepressants, and antidepressant tolerance (initial response followed by later loss of response). The investigators propose to use these predictors to pick out patients that are more likely to respond to Geodon for MDD. This will be the first RCT of these predictors of depressive response applied to neuroleptics.

Detailed description

This will be a three-site, block randomized (1:1 ratio) double-blind, placebo-controlled prospective cross-over study with 50 subjects. Patients will be randomized to receiving ziprasidone-washout-placebo or placebo- washout-ziprasidone for 13-weeks. Primary and Secondary and safety outcomes: The primary outcome measure will be change from baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score to end of treatment. Safety outcomes will be determined by spontaneously reported adverse events on the case report form.

Interventions

DRUGziprasidone

Ziprasidone will be administered as a pill. The once-daily total daily dose will be 80-160 mg/d of ziprasidone. Dosing will begin at 20 mg BID with an escalation strategy based on target symptoms and tolerability, with a target dose range of 80-160 mg/d. Dose escalations will occur by increments of 20-40 mg weekly.

DRUGSugar pill

The once-daily total daily dose will be 80-160 mg/d of the sugar pill. Dosing will begin at 20 mg BID with an escalation strategy based on target symptoms and tolerability, with a target dose range of 80-160 mg/d. Dose escalations will occur by increments of 20-40 mg weekly.

Sponsors

Duke University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of South Carolina
CollaboratorOTHER
Tufts Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 18-70 years. 2. If female, nonpregnant/nonlactating 3. If a sexually active female of reproductive potential, must be using adequate contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, barrier protection, or prior tubal ligation) 4. Currently meets DSM-IV criteria for a major depressive episode, non-psychotic. 5. Having at least 3 of the following criteria listed for predictors of depressive response to neuroleptics: a family history of bipolar disorder, antidepressant-induced mania, highly recurrent depressive episodes (\>5), atypical depression, early age of onset of depression (\< age 20), failure to respond to antidepressants, and antidepressant tolerance (initial response followed by later loss of response). Inadequate response to antidepressants is identified as follows: having a score of ≥14 on the 17-item HAMD or a CGI-S score of ≥ 3 after a retrospective confirmation of an adequate trial of a single antidepressant (defined as a ≥ 6-week trial of acceptable therapeutic dose \[≥ 40 mg of fluoxetine, paroxetine or citalopram, 20 mg of escitalopram, 60 mg of duloxetine, 37.5 mg of paroxetine CR, 150 mg of sertraline, 100 mg of fluvoxamine, 225 mg of venlafaxine XR, 30 mg of mirtazapine, 300 mg of bupropion, 75 mg of nortriptyline, 20 mg of protriptyline, 100 mg of amitriptyline or imipramine)

Exclusion criteria

1. Bipolar depression 2. Sensitivity to or failure to respond to ziprasidone by history or ziprasidone use in previous 3 months 3. Active substance abuse or dependence in the previous 3 month 4. Psychotic disorders 5. Serious suicidality as evidenced by score of 3 or greater on suicide item of MADRS 6. Medically unstable as judged by study investigators 7. Lack of capacity to provide informed, written, consent to investigators 8. Previous diagnosed cardiac arrhythmias

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MADRS Improvement Over 6 Weeks13 weeks (Two 6 week periods plus a one week washout)Montgomery Asberg Depression scale improvement was assessed in two 6 week crossover periods. Minimum score on MADRS is 0, the maximum is 60. Higher scores represent a worse outcome, i.e., greater severity of depressive symptoms. Scores of about 20 and above are generally seen as consistent with being in a full major depressive episode. No subscales were used or combined.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Predictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study Population13 weeksThe specific bipolarity predictors in patients with MDD were assessed.

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
All participants were randomized to either placebo followed by ziprasidone crossover, or ziprsidone followed by placebo crossover.
49
Total49

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous42.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Sex: Female, Male
Female
33 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 4921 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 491 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

MADRS Improvement Over 6 Weeks

Montgomery Asberg Depression scale improvement was assessed in two 6 week crossover periods. Minimum score on MADRS is 0, the maximum is 60. Higher scores represent a worse outcome, i.e., greater severity of depressive symptoms. Scores of about 20 and above are generally seen as consistent with being in a full major depressive episode. No subscales were used or combined.

Time frame: 13 weeks (Two 6 week periods plus a one week washout)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMADRS Improvement Over 6 Weeks10.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
ZiprasidoneMADRS Improvement Over 6 Weeks6.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Comparison: Linear mixed effects regression modelp-value: 0.48Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Predictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study Population

The specific bipolarity predictors in patients with MDD were assessed.

Time frame: 13 weeks

Population: The most common predictor was antidepressant tolerance, as reported below in 37 subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationAntidepressant tolerance75.0 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationAntidepressant nonresponse73.5 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationHighly recurrent depressive episodes72.3 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationAtypical depression52.9 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationFamily history of bipolar disorder46.0 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationEarly age of onset47.6 percentage of subjects
PlaceboPredictors of Bipolarity to Define the Study PopulationAntidepressant-induced mania8.8 percentage of subjects

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026