Skip to content

PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian Nutrition Guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy: The PERFECTIS Study

PERFormance Enhancement of the Canadian Nutrition Guidelines by a Tailored Implementation Strategy: The PERFECTIS Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01168128
Acronym
PERFECTIS
Enrollment
278
Registered
2010-07-23
Start date
2009-09-16
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2020-12-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Critically Ill, Intensive Care Unit

Keywords

Enteral Nutrition, Parenteral Nutrition, Critically ill, Nutrition Therapy, Nutrition Support, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Guideline Adherence, Quality Assurance, Health Care, Nutrition Surveys, Questionnaires

Brief summary

Canadian Critical Care Nutrition Guidelines assist health practitioners in identifying best practices for feeding critically ill patients. However, guidelines have resulted in little change in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) practices, possibly because barriers to change differ between ICUs. Change may be facilitated if strategies specifically address identified barriers. The investigators hypothesize that barriers are inversely related to nutrition performance. Tailoring change strategies to overcome barriers to change will reduce the presence of these barriers and lead to improvements in nutrition practice.

Detailed description

A before-after study will be conducted in 7 Canadian and US ICUs. Each participating ICU will implement a tailored guideline implementation intervention aimed at narrowing the guideline-practice gap. The tailored implementation will consist of 4 phases: 1. Audit of Nutrition Practices: The nutrition practice audit will be conducted as part of the data collection for our ongoing international nutrition quality improvement project. This involves collecting data on personal characteristics and nutrition therapy in a consecutive cohort of 20 mechanically-ventilated critically ill adult patients. Performance at each ICU will be assessed by a benchmarked report comparing the nutrition practices to individual recommendations of the Canadian Critical Care Nutrition CPGs, thus enabling identification of the ICUs strengths and weaknesses, and highlighting areas to target for improvement. 2. Barriers Questionnaire: The barriers and enablers questionnaire will be completed by all physicians, all ICU leadership, the dietitian(s), and a random sample of 30 full- and part-time nurses. This questionnaire asks questions about barriers associated with guideline implementation, such as the characteristics of the guidelines, the care provider, the patient, and the context. 3. Tailored Action Plan: Results of the audit of nutrition practices and barriers questionnaire will be evaluated by the investigators and representatives from the Canadian Critical Care Nutrition CPGs Committee. Committee members include research personnel, intensivists, ICU nurse educators, dietitians, and experts in knowledge translation and health services research. They will be responsible for reviewing the benchmarked reports for each participating ICU, identifying the gaps between the key guideline recommendations and what is actually happening in practice, and reviewing the results of the barriers questionnaire to identify the barriers associated with adhering to these specific recommendations at each site. In collaboration with the local opinion leaders, a tailored 12 month action plan will be developed for each individual ICU. The specific behavioral change strategies to be implemented as part of the tailored action plan will likely include powerpoint presentations and handouts, packages of key journal articles, reminders (e.g. posters, checklists), system tools (e.g. pre-printed orders, bedside algorithms), interactive web-based tutorials, guidelines on establishing local implementation teams and creating a culture of team work. Prior to the implementation of these behavioral change strategies in the context of the before-after study, focus groups will be conducted to elicit feedback, and revisions made accordingly. 4. Audit of Nutrition Practices: The audit of nutrition practices will be repeated following the 12 month implementation period in order to evaluate changes in nutrition practices.

Interventions

OTHERTailored Change Strategy

e.g. Education, decision support tools

Sponsors

Ministry of Research, Innovation and Science, Ontario
CollaboratorOTHER
Canadian Foundation for Dietetic Research (CFDR)
CollaboratorOTHER
Daren K. Heyland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ICUs must be affiliated with a registered dietitian. * ICUs must have a minimum of 8 beds. * ICUs must be located in Canada, Australia, or US. * ICUs have previously participated in the International Nutrition Survey.

Exclusion criteria

* ICUs with less than 8 beds. * ICUs with high nutrition performance, as demonstrated previously in the International Nutrition Survey (i.e. average nutritional adequacy \>60% and/or above 50th percentile when ranked against all participating ICUs according to nutrition practice performance score)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of the study design and intervention12 months post implementation of interventionAssessed by rate of completion of barriers questionnaires, development of unique tailored action plans at each site, compliance and satisfaction with the tailored action plans, and other user feedback.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in nutrition performance score20-24 monthsThe nutrition performance score is a composite measure including use, timing and adequacy of nutrition, use of small bowel feeds and motility agents, and hyperglycemia. Nutrition performance scores will be calculated after each of the two nutrition practice audits.
Change in barriers to implementation of critical care nutrition clinical practice guidelines12 months post implementation of interventionBarriers questionnaire

Countries

Canada, United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026