Skip to content

Neurophysiological Reserve With Caffeine Manipulation

Neurophysiological Reserve: Peripheral and Central Effects of Caffeine Manipulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01167478
Enrollment
20
Registered
2010-07-22
Start date
2011-03-31
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2014-12-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Caffeine, Placebo

Keywords

Exercise, Caffeine, Reserve

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to verify if there is a neurophysiologic reserve when caffeine and placebo perceived as caffeine are manipulated in closed- and opened-loop exercises. Parameters of excitability level of skeletal muscle and Central Nervous System (CNS), and peripheral metabolism will be measured

Detailed description

A neurophysiological reserve related to central mechanisms is supposed to be present, which should be observed when an increased central drive occurs. In theory, according to the central regulation model of effort, an increased performance could be due to the elevation on Central Nervous System excitability and activity, since exercise is not peripherally limited. Conversely, the absence of muscle performance improvement to the increased central drive promoted by caffeine would be an evidence for a peripherally localized neurophysiological limit and would indicate the absence of reserve. Therefore, if present, this reserve could be verified by using peripheral and central measures derived from electric-stimulation, evoked twitch and interpolated twitch techniques, associated to measures of EMG and peripheral metabolism, when caffeine is manipulated during closed- and opened-loop exercise. In addition, there should also be possible to access the reserve without stimulant substance manipulation (placebo effect). By teleological argument derived from the central regulation model of effort, a neurophysiological reserve would be a natural mechanism to protect the cellular integrity. Therefore, it would be reasonable to hypothesize that, if present, a reserve would be observed by an increase in performance promoted by an elevation in central drive when placebo is perceived as caffeine. Unfortunately, however, no study utilized this experimental approach, including measures of central and peripheral activity during closed- and opened-loop exercise, to consistently respond the reserve question.

Interventions

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTCaffeine

After ingestion of 6 mg.kg-1 of body mass of caffeine, subjects will perform the one exercise trial.

Sponsors

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Sao Paulo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* trained cyclists * trained in long distance races

Exclusion criteria

* Maximum oxygen uptake lower than 55 ml/kg/min

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurophysiological reserve evidenced by caffeineImmediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)The time to cover a 4-km trial (closed-loop) or the time to exhaustion in an incremental intensity test (opened-loop) can show if the caffeine manipulation affects the performance. In addition, measures of CNS excitability such as EMG during the closed-loop exercise or at the exhaustion point in the opened-loop exercise, and measures such as the amplitude of H reflex, the rate of increase in H reflex/M wave relationship, can indicate if some central or peripheral alteration occurred during the exercises.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Neurophysiological reserve evidenced by placeboImmediately after the administration (around 10 minutes)The placebo should also promote decrease in time of trial or increase in mean power output during a closed-loop exercise, elevation in time to exhaustion and maximal power output during an opened-loop exercise, and increase in maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) and time to contraction in a target force. Also, there should be a higher CNS excitability such as: 1) higher EMG during closed-loop exercise and higher EMG at the exhaustion point in an opened-loop exercise; 2) increased amplitude of H reflex; 3) elevation on the rate of increase in H reflex/M wave relationship.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026