Skip to content

Comparison Between High-flow Nasal Cannula System and Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Prospective, Open-labeled, Randomized Controlled Trial of Comparison Between High-flow Nasal Cannula System and Non-invasive Ventilation in Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01166256
Enrollment
74
Registered
2010-07-21
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Keywords

respiratory failure

Brief summary

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure may require invasive mechanical ventilation. However, invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with a variety of complications. Non-invasive ventilation has been presented as an alternative treatment but controversy remains. The investigators hypothesize that high-flow nasal cannula system is effective enough to prevent intubation in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and not inferior to non-invasive ventilation.

Interventions

DEVICENon-invasive ventilation

Noninvasive ventilation: The inspiratory(IPAP) and expiratory positive airways pressure (EPAP), and the levels of FiO2 is set achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.

DEVICEHigh flow nasal cannula system

High flow nasal cannula system: FiO2 and flow rate of oxygen is set to achieve SpO2 \>92% or PaO2 \>65 mmHg.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age above 18 * patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 years * hypercapnia (arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) \>45mmHg) at admission * need for emergency intubation, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation * recent esophageal, facial or cranial trauma or surgery * severely decreased consciousness (Glasgow coma score \<11) * cardiogenic shock or severe hemodynamic instability * systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg associated with decreased urinary output(\<20 mL.h-1) despite fluid repletion and use of vasoactive agents * lack of co-operation * altered mental status with decreased consciousness and/or evidence of inability to understand or lack of willingness to co-operate with the procedures * tracheotomy or other upper airway disorders * severe ventricular arrhythmia or active myocardial ischemia * active upper gastrointestinal bleeding * inability to clear respiratory secretions * more than one severe organ dysfunction in addition to respiratory failure

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success rate of treatment in two groupsup to 28 daysSuccessful treatment is to avoid intubation and achieve PaO2 \>75 mmHg without respiratory distress for 24 hours while spontaneously breathing oxygen provided by a Venturi device at FiO2 0.50.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
compliance of treatmentup to 28 daysWithdrawl of non-invasive ventilation or high-flow nasal cannula system without intubation because of intolerance
adverse eventup to 28 days
hospital length of stayup to 90 days
Hospital mortalityup to 90 days

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026