Skip to content

Study HZA106827: Efficacy/Safety Study of Fluticasone Furoate/Vilanterol (GW642444) in Adult and Adolescent Asthmatics

HZA106827: A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled (With Rescue Medication), Parallel Group Multicentre Study of Fluticasone Furoate/GW642444 Inhalation Powder and Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder Alone in the Treatment of Persistent Asthma in Adults and Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01165138
Enrollment
612
Registered
2010-07-19
Start date
2010-08-20
Completion date
2011-10-19
Last updated
2018-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma

Keywords

GW642444, Vilanterol, Asthma, Fluticasone Furoate

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (GW642444) inhalation powder and fluticasone furoate inhalation powder both administered once daily in adolescent and adult subjects 12 years of age and older with persistent bronchial asthma over a 12 week treatment period.

Interventions

Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol Inhalation Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks

Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks

DRUGPlacebo Inhaltion Powder

Placebo Inhaltion Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Outpatients at least 12 years of age * Male and female; female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use birth control * Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 40-90% predicted normal * Reversibility FEV1 of at least 12% and 200mL * Current asthma therapy includes inhaled corticosteroid use for at least 12 weeks prior to first visit

Exclusion criteria

* History of life-threatening asthma during last 10 years * Respiratory infection or oral candidiasis * Asthma exacerbation requiring oral corticosteroids or that required overnight hospitalisation requiring additional asthma treatment * Uncontrolled disease or clinical abnormality * Allergies to study drugs or the excipients * Taking another investigational medication or prohibited medication * Night shift workers * Current smokers or subjects with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on-treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline through Week 12 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline trough FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing m
Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12Baseline and Week 12Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 12 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early WithdrawalBaseline and Week 12/Early WithdrawalThe AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline.
Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12The number of inhalations of rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered to be rescue free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at RandomizationRandomizationPulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Randomization. Serial FEV1 measurements after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1 hour post-dose were assessed. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using a repeated measures model adjusted for baseline, region, sex, age, treatment group, and planned time points.
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment PeriodFrom the first dose of the study medication up to Week 12/Early WithdrawalThe number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed.
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and Week 12Asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no symptoms was considered to be symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalAt the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptom); much less often , somewhat less often , a little less often , the same , a little more often , somewhat more often , much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use).
Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline up to Week 12/Early WithdrawalAll unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare were recorded.
Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12Week 12Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 12 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed based on 3 steps: open the device, inhale the dose, and close the device. If the participants did not perform the maneuvers correctly, the step of the inhaler use that was performed incorrectly by the participants was recorded. The entire procedure was demonstrated once again. and the number of times that the participants required additional instruction (RAI) was recorded.
Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4Baseline (BL), Week 2 (W2), and Week 4 (W4)Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed.
Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at BaselineBaselinePulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.
Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Baseline and Week 12Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean serial FEV1 over 0-4 hours was calculated using the serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.
Number of Participants With Bronchodilator EffectBaselineBronchodilator effect is defined as an increase of FEV1 (defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) from Baseline of both 12% and 200 milliliters (mL) during 24 hours, which was evaluated using the serial FEV1 measurements at Baseline (Visit 3).
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline up to Week 12Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily AM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment PeriodFrom Baseline up to Week 12PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily PM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12Baseline and Week 12/Early WithdrawalThe ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline.

Countries

Germany, Japan, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Participants meeting eligibility criteria at the Screening visit completed a 4-week Run-in Period for Baseline safety evaluations and measures of asthma status. Participants were then randomized to a 12-week Treatment Period. 1110 participants were screened, 610 were randomized, and 609 received \>=1 dose of study treatment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo once daily (OD) in the evening from the dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period.
203
FF 100 µg OD
Participants received Fluticasone Furoate (FF) 100 microgram (µg) inhalation powder OD in the evening from the DPI for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period.
205
FF/VI 100/25 µg OD
Participants received FF/Vilanterol (VI) 100/25 µg inhalation powder OD in the evening from the DPI for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period.
201
Total609

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0102
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy03267
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up0012
Overall StudyPhysician Decision0676
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0702
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject0663

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboFF 100 µg ODFF/VI 100/25 µg ODTotal
Age, Continuous38.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.49
40.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.78
40.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.38
39.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.56
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American/African Heritage
14 participants16 participants13 participants43 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - Japanese Heritage
19 participants16 participants15 participants50 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian - South East Asian Heritage
0 participants0 participants1 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Mixed Race
1 participants1 participants0 participants2 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - Arabic/North African Heritage
0 participants1 participants0 participants1 participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage
169 participants170 participants172 participants511 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
111 Participants126 Participants116 Participants353 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
92 Participants79 Participants85 Participants256 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 20320 / 20529 / 201
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 2031 / 2050 / 201

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 12 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated for the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed at Week 12.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 120.212 LitersStandard Error 0.0456
FF 100 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 120.398 LitersStandard Error 0.0432
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 120.513 LitersStandard Error 0.043
p-value: 0.00395% CI: [0.062, 0.31]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.178, 0.426]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.0695% CI: [-0.005, 0.236]ANCOVA
Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on-treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline through Week 12 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline trough FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing m

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized to treatment, who received at least one dose of the study medication. Only those participants with non-missing covariates and post-Baseline FEV1 data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 120.196 LitersStandard Error 0.031
FF 100 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 120.332 LitersStandard Error 0.0302
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 120.368 LitersStandard Error 0.0304
p-value: 0.00295% CI: [0.051, 0.222]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [0.087, 0.258]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.40595% CI: [-0.048, 0.12]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period

Asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no symptoms was considered to be symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period14.6 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.15
FF 100 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period20.4 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.13
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period32.5 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.14
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal

The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal0.61 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
FF 100 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal0.76 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.055
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal0.91 Score on a scaleStandard Error 0.055
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period

The number of inhalations of rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered to be rescue free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period17.8 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.26
FF 100 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period26.5 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.25
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period37.1 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periodsStandard Error 2.26
Secondary

Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period

The number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed.

Time frame: From the first dose of the study medication up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period32 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period6 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period7 participants
Secondary

Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Randomization. Serial FEV1 measurements after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1 hour post-dose were assessed. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using a repeated measures model adjusted for baseline, region, sex, age, treatment group, and planned time points.

Time frame: Randomization

Population: ITT Population. Serial FEV1 was calculated for the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 1172.489 LitersStandard Error 0.0308
PlaceboSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 1172.491 LitersStandard Error 0.0336
PlaceboSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 1182.532 LitersStandard Error 0.0354
PlaceboSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization1 Hour, n=119, 116, 1192.552 LitersStandard Error 0.0344
FF 100 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization1 Hour, n=119, 116, 1192.571 LitersStandard Error 0.035
FF 100 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 1172.493 LitersStandard Error 0.0314
FF 100 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 1182.552 LitersStandard Error 0.0359
FF 100 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 1172.529 LitersStandard Error 0.0342
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization1 Hour, n=119, 116, 1192.674 LitersStandard Error 0.0344
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 1172.566 LitersStandard Error 0.0336
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 1182.596 LitersStandard Error 0.0354
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODSerial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 1172.484 LitersStandard Error 0.0308
Other Pre-specified

Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12

The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 122.5 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.26
FF 100 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 123.8 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODChange From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 124.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Other Pre-specified

Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 12 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: Week 12

Population: ITT Population. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 was analyzed in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 12 was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 122.462 LitersStandard Error 0.0502
FF 100 µg ODClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 122.674 LitersStandard Error 0.0475
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODClinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 122.830 LitersStandard Error 0.0468
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period

PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily PM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period-1.8 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.36
FF 100 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period14.1 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.34
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period26.4 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.35
Other Pre-specified

Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period

Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily AM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period-0.4 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.42
FF 100 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period18.3 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.41
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODMean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period32.9 Liters per minuteStandard Error 2.42
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4

Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed.

Time frame: Baseline (BL), Week 2 (W2), and Week 4 (W4)

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195175 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200190 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 2019 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 2000 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 1950 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201194 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 1950 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201196 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 2019 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200203 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 2000 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195199 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 2000 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 20113 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 1950 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195195 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200200 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201188 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect

Bronchodilator effect is defined as an increase of FEV1 (defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) from Baseline of both 12% and 200 milliliters (mL) during 24 hours, which was evaluated using the serial FEV1 measurements at Baseline (Visit 3).

Time frame: Baseline

Population: ITT Population. Only the subset of participants performing serial measurements were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect73 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect77 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect97 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal

At the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptom); much less often , somewhat less often , a little less often , the same , a little more often , somewhat more often , much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use).

Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 19111 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 18436 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 18437 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 1915 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 18242 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 18432 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 18436 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 19142 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 18437 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 18444 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 1841 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 1841 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 18438 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 1824 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 1844 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 18429 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 19133 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 1847 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 18212 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 1826 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 1916 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 18224 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 1829 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 1918 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 18234 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 18229 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 1916 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 1823 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 18229 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 19139 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 19134 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 18237 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 19140 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 1823 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 18238 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 19135 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 19131 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 18232 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 1844 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 19113 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 19145 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 18412 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 19159 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 19147 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 19165 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 19147 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 19129 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 19110 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 1910 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 1910 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 19149 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 19148 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 19133 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 1916 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 1913 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 1910 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 18454 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 18460 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 18440 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 18433 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 1845 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 1840 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 1840 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 18465 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 18448 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 18434 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 18439 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 1841 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 1844 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 1840 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 18266 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 18249 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 18235 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 18230 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 1827 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 1820 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 1820 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 18276 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 18246 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 18225 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 18232 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 1826 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 1821 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 1821 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 18289 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 1840 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 19165 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 19151 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 1825 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 18286 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 19175 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 18243 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 18252 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 1910 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 19132 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 18213 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 1912 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 18221 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 18223 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 1913 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 1820 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 1827 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 18424 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 19123 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 1843 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 18422 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 18223 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 1842 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 18463 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 1821 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 1841 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 18469 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 19137 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 18486 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 1910 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 1842 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 18443 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 1911 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 1820 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 18425 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 19161 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 18423 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 1914 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 1821 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 1845 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early WithdrawalWeek 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 19128 participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4

Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed based on 3 steps: open the device, inhale the dose, and close the device. If the participants did not perform the maneuvers correctly, the step of the inhaler use that was performed incorrectly by the participants was recorded. The entire procedure was demonstrated once again. and the number of times that the participants required additional instruction (RAI) was recorded.

Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4

Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who used the inhaler incorrectly at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 131 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 139 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0,NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 131 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 138 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 134 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 135 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 135 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 134 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0,NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF 100 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 136 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 130 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 131 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 134 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 136 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 138 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 131 participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0,NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0NA participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period

All unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare were recorded.

Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal

Population: ITT Population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.07
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
PlaceboNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.24
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.39
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.07
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF 100 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Emergency Room Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Day)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Physician Office/Practice Visits0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0.1
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODNumber of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment PeriodNumber of Home Visits (Night)0.0 Number of visitsStandard Deviation 0
Other Pre-specified

Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline2.543 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8494
FF 100 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline2.552 LitersStandard Deviation 0.7527
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline2.709 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8153
Other Pre-specified

Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12

Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean serial FEV1 over 0-4 hours was calculated using the serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 12

Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 12 was performed. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Baseline, n=120, 115, 1192.563 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8194
PlaceboWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Week 12, n=96, 105, 1092.636 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8519
FF 100 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Week 12, n=96, 105, 1092.657 LitersStandard Deviation 0.7912
FF 100 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Baseline, n=120, 115, 1192.522 LitersStandard Deviation 0.7479
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Baseline, n=120, 115, 1192.693 LitersStandard Deviation 0.7626
FF/VI 100/25 µg ODWeighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12Week 12, n=96, 105, 1092.894 LitersStandard Deviation 0.8383

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026