Asthma
Conditions
Keywords
GW642444, Vilanterol, Asthma, Fluticasone Furoate
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the efficacy and safety of fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (GW642444) inhalation powder and fluticasone furoate inhalation powder both administered once daily in adolescent and adult subjects 12 years of age and older with persistent bronchial asthma over a 12 week treatment period.
Interventions
Fluticasone furoate/Vilanterol Inhalation Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks
Fluticasone Furoate Inhalation Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks
Placebo Inhaltion Powder inhaled orally once daily for 12 weeks
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Outpatients at least 12 years of age * Male and female; female subjects of childbearing potential must be willing to use birth control * Pre-bronchodilator FEV1 of 40-90% predicted normal * Reversibility FEV1 of at least 12% and 200mL * Current asthma therapy includes inhaled corticosteroid use for at least 12 weeks prior to first visit
Exclusion criteria
* History of life-threatening asthma during last 10 years * Respiratory infection or oral candidiasis * Asthma exacerbation requiring oral corticosteroids or that required overnight hospitalisation requiring additional asthma treatment * Uncontrolled disease or clinical abnormality * Allergies to study drugs or the excipients * Taking another investigational medication or prohibited medication * Night shift workers * Current smokers or subjects with a smoking history of at least 10 pack years
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on-treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline through Week 12 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline trough FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing m |
| Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 12 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | Baseline and Week 12 | The number of inhalations of rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered to be rescue free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
| Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | Randomization | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Randomization. Serial FEV1 measurements after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1 hour post-dose were assessed. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using a repeated measures model adjusted for baseline, region, sex, age, treatment group, and planned time points. |
| Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period | From the first dose of the study medication up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal | The number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed. |
| Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | Baseline and Week 12 | Asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no symptoms was considered to be symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | At the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptom); much less often , somewhat less often , a little less often , the same , a little more often , somewhat more often , much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use). |
| Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | From Baseline up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal | All unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare were recorded. |
| Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12 | Week 12 | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 12 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
| Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed based on 3 steps: open the device, inhale the dose, and close the device. If the participants did not perform the maneuvers correctly, the step of the inhaler use that was performed incorrectly by the participants was recorded. The entire procedure was demonstrated once again. and the number of times that the participants required additional instruction (RAI) was recorded. |
| Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | Baseline (BL), Week 2 (W2), and Week 4 (W4) | Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed. |
| Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline | Baseline | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. |
| Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12 | Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean serial FEV1 over 0-4 hours was calculated using the serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. |
| Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect | Baseline | Bronchodilator effect is defined as an increase of FEV1 (defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) from Baseline of both 12% and 200 milliliters (mL) during 24 hours, which was evaluated using the serial FEV1 measurements at Baseline (Visit 3). |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | From Baseline up to Week 12 | Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily AM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | From Baseline up to Week 12 | PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily PM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group. |
| Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12 | Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline. |
Countries
Germany, Japan, Poland, Romania, Ukraine, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
Participants meeting eligibility criteria at the Screening visit completed a 4-week Run-in Period for Baseline safety evaluations and measures of asthma status. Participants were then randomized to a 12-week Treatment Period. 1110 participants were screened, 610 were randomized, and 609 received \>=1 dose of study treatment.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Placebo Participants received placebo once daily (OD) in the evening from the dry powder inhaler (DPI) for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period. | 203 |
| FF 100 µg OD Participants received Fluticasone Furoate (FF) 100 microgram (µg) inhalation powder OD in the evening from the DPI for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period. | 205 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD Participants received FF/Vilanterol (VI) 100/25 µg inhalation powder OD in the evening from the DPI for 12 weeks. Participants were provided albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol to be used as rescue medication during the Treatment Period. | 201 |
| Total | 609 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 0 | 32 | 6 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 0 | 6 | 7 | 6 |
| Overall Study | Protocol Violation | 0 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 6 | 6 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Placebo | FF 100 µg OD | FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 38.1 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.49 | 40.4 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.78 | 40.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.38 | 39.7 Years STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.56 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized African American/African Heritage | 14 participants | 16 participants | 13 participants | 43 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - Japanese Heritage | 19 participants | 16 participants | 15 participants | 50 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Asian - South East Asian Heritage | 0 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Mixed Race | 1 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 2 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - Arabic/North African Heritage | 0 participants | 1 participants | 0 participants | 1 participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized White - White/Caucasian/European Heritage | 169 participants | 170 participants | 172 participants | 511 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 111 Participants | 126 Participants | 116 Participants | 353 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 92 Participants | 79 Participants | 85 Participants | 256 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 22 / 203 | 20 / 205 | 29 / 201 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 203 | 1 / 205 | 0 / 201 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the average Week 12 FEV1 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated for the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed at Week 12.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 | 0.212 Liters | Standard Error 0.0456 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 | 0.398 Liters | Standard Error 0.0432 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Change From Baseline in Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Week 12 | 0.513 Liters | Standard Error 0.043 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Trough FEV1 is defined as the clinic visit (pre-bronchodilator and pre-dose) FEV1measurement taken at the clinic visit while still on-treatment. Pre-dose and pre-rescue albuterol/salbutamol trough FEV1 was measured electronically by spirometry in the evening at the Baseline through Week 12 clinic visits. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. Baseline was the pre-dose value obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the Week 12 value minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with covariates of Baseline trough FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing data, in which the last non-missing post-Baseline on-treatment measurement at scheduled clinic visits was used to impute the missing m
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT) Population: all participants randomized to treatment, who received at least one dose of the study medication. Only those participants with non-missing covariates and post-Baseline FEV1 data were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 | 0.196 Liters | Standard Error 0.031 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 | 0.332 Liters | Standard Error 0.0302 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinic Visit Trough (Pre-bronchodilator and Pre-dose) Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at Week 12 | 0.368 Liters | Standard Error 0.0304 |
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period
Asthma symptoms were recorded in a daily eDairy by the participants every day in the morning and evening before taking any rescue or study medication and before the peak expiratory flow measurement. A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no symptoms was considered to be symptom free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 14.6 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.15 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 20.4 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.13 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Symptom-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 32.5 Percentage of symptom-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.14 |
Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal
The AQLQ is a disease-specific, self-administered quality of life questionnaire used to evaluate the impact of asthma treatments on the quality of life of asthma sufferers. The AQLQ for 12 years and older (AQLQ \[+12\]) is a modified version of the AQLQ for use in asthma patients between the age of 12 and 70. The AQLQ contains 32 items in 4 domains: activity limitation (11 items), symptoms (12 items), emotional function (5 items), and environmental stimuli (4 items). For the 32 items on the questionnaire, the response format consists of a seven-point scale, where a value of 1 indicates total impairment and a value of 7 indicates no impairment. The AQLQ total score is defined as the average of the scores from all 32 questions; thus, the total score ranges from 1 (indicates total impairment) to 7 (indicates no impairment). Baseline was the total score obtained at Visit 3. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12 minus the total score at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal | 0.61 Score on a scale | Standard Error 0.061 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal | 0.76 Score on a scale | Standard Error 0.055 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Total Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) (+12) Score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal | 0.91 Score on a scale | Standard Error 0.055 |
Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period
The number of inhalations of rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol used during the day and night was recorded by the participants in a daily electronic diary (eDiary). A 24-hour (hr) period in which a participant's responses to both the morning and evening assessments indicated no use of rescue medication was considered to be rescue free. The Baseline value was derived from the last 7 days of the daily eDiary prior to the randomization of the participant. Change from Baseline was calculated as the averaged value during the 12-week Treatment Period minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 17.8 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.26 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 26.5 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.25 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Rescue-free 24-hour (hr) Periods During the 12-week Treatment Period | 37.1 Percentage of rescue-free 24-hr periods | Standard Error 2.26 |
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period
The number of participants whose primary reason for withdrawal was lack of efficacy was analyzed.
Time frame: From the first dose of the study medication up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period | 32 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period | 6 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During the 12-week Treatment Period | 7 participants |
Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Randomization. Serial FEV1 measurements after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1 hour post-dose were assessed. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using a repeated measures model adjusted for baseline, region, sex, age, treatment group, and planned time points.
Time frame: Randomization
Population: ITT Population. Serial FEV1 was calculated for the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed (represented by n=X in the category titles). Different participants may have been analyzed for different parameters, so the overall number of participants analyzed
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 117 | 2.489 Liters | Standard Error 0.0308 |
| Placebo | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 117 | 2.491 Liters | Standard Error 0.0336 |
| Placebo | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 118 | 2.532 Liters | Standard Error 0.0354 |
| Placebo | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 1 Hour, n=119, 116, 119 | 2.552 Liters | Standard Error 0.0344 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 1 Hour, n=119, 116, 119 | 2.571 Liters | Standard Error 0.035 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 117 | 2.493 Liters | Standard Error 0.0314 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 118 | 2.552 Liters | Standard Error 0.0359 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 117 | 2.529 Liters | Standard Error 0.0342 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 1 Hour, n=119, 116, 119 | 2.674 Liters | Standard Error 0.0344 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 15 Minutes, n=118, 115, 117 | 2.566 Liters | Standard Error 0.0336 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 30 Minutes, n=118, 116, 118 | 2.596 Liters | Standard Error 0.0354 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Serial FEV1 Over 0-1 Hour Post-dose at Randomization | 5 Minutes, n=117, 112, 117 | 2.484 Liters | Standard Error 0.0308 |
Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12
The ACT is a 5-item questionnaire developed as a measure of the participant's asthma control. Questions are designed to be self-completed by the participant and include the following: In the past 4 weeks, How much of the time did your asthma keep you from getting as much done at work, school or at home?, How often have you had shortness of breath?, How often did your asthma symptoms wake you up at night or earlier than usual in the morning?, How often have you used your rescue inhaler or nebulizer medication (such as albuterol)? and How would you rate your asthma control? The ACT total score is defined as the sum of the scores from all 5 questions, provided all questions have been answered; thus, the total score ranges from 5 (poor control of asthma) to 25 (complete control of asthma). A score of 20 or higher indicates well-controlled asthma. Change from Baseline was calculated as the total score at Week 12/Early Withdrawal minus the total score at Baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12/Early Withdrawal
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12 | 2.5 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.26 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12 | 3.8 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Change From Baseline in the Asthma Control Test (ACT) Score at Week 12 | 4.4 Scores on a scale | Standard Error 0.23 |
Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Week 12 clinic visit. The highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements was recorded. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline FEV1, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: Week 12
Population: ITT Population. 12-hour post-dose FEV1 was analyzed in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 12 was performed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12 | 2.462 Liters | Standard Error 0.0502 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12 | 2.674 Liters | Standard Error 0.0475 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Clinic Visit 12-hour Post-dose FEV1 at Week 12 | 2.830 Liters | Standard Error 0.0468 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period
PEF is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each evening prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily PM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | -1.8 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.36 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | 14.1 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.34 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Evening (PM) PEF Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | 26.4 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.35 |
Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) is defined as the maximum airflow during a forced expiration beginning with the lungs fully inflated. PEF was measured by the participants using a hand-held electronic peak flow meter each morning prior to the dose of study medication and any rescue albuterol/salbutamol inhalation aerosol use. Change from Baseline (defined as the last 7 days prior to randomization of the participants) was calculated as the value of the averaged daily AM PEF over the 12-week treatment period (at Week 12) minus the Baseline value. The analysis was performed using an ANCOVA model with covariates of Baseline, region, sex, age, and treatment group.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | -0.4 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.42 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | 18.3 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.41 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Mean Change From Baseline in Daily Morning (AM) Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) Averaged Over the 12-week Treatment Period | 32.9 Liters per minute | Standard Error 2.42 |
Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4
Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed.
Time frame: Baseline (BL), Week 2 (W2), and Week 4 (W4)
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195 | 175 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200 | 190 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 201 | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 200 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 195 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201 | 194 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 195 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201 | 196 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 201 | 9 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200 | 203 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 200 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195 | 199 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=190, 203, 200 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=203, 205, 201 | 13 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Incorrectly, n=175, 199, 195 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=175, 199, 195 | 195 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=190, 203, 200 | 200 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants Who Used the Inhaler Correctly or Incorrectly at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Used Inhaler Correctly, n=203, 205, 201 | 188 participants |
Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect
Bronchodilator effect is defined as an increase of FEV1 (defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second) from Baseline of both 12% and 200 milliliters (mL) during 24 hours, which was evaluated using the serial FEV1 measurements at Baseline (Visit 3).
Time frame: Baseline
Population: ITT Population. Only the subset of participants performing serial measurements were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect | 73 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect | 77 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With Bronchodilator Effect | 97 participants |
Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal
At the end of Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal, the Global Assessment of Change Questionnaire that assesses changes in asthma symptoms (AS) and rescue medication use (RMU) was completed by the participants. The number of participants who chose the following answers to the questionnaire were determined: much better, somewhat better, a little better, the same, a little worse, somewhat worse, much worse (to assess the changes in asthma symptom); much less often , somewhat less often , a little less often , the same , a little more often , somewhat more often , much more often (to assess the changes in the frequency of rescue medication use).
Time frame: Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 11 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 184 | 36 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 37 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 5 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 42 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 32 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 184 | 36 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 191 | 42 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 37 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 184 | 44 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 184 | 38 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 184 | 29 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 33 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 7 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 12 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 24 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 182 | 34 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 182 | 29 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 6 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 182 | 29 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 39 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 191 | 34 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 182 | 37 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 40 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 3 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 182 | 38 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 35 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 31 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 32 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 4 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 13 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 191 | 45 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 12 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 59 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 191 | 47 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 191 | 65 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 191 | 47 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 29 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 10 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 49 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 48 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 33 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 6 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 3 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 184 | 54 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 184 | 60 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 184 | 40 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 184 | 33 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 5 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 65 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 48 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 34 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 184 | 39 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 1 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 4 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 182 | 66 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 182 | 49 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 182 | 35 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 182 | 30 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 7 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 76 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 46 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 25 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 182 | 32 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 6 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 1 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 89 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much better, n=174, 198, 191 | 65 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 51 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 5 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much better, n=152, 187, 182 | 86 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 75 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 43 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat better, n=152, 187, 182 | 52 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Much worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little less often, n=174, 198, 191 | 32 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little better, n=152, 187, 182 | 13 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 2 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -A little less often, n=150, 187, 182 | 21 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - The same, n=152, 187, 182 | 23 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little worse, n=174, 198, 191 | 3 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - Much more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - A little worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 7 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - The same, n=159, 192, 184 | 24 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 23 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 3 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - A little better, n=159, 192, 184 | 22 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU - The same, n=150, 187, 182 | 23 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 2 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Somewhat better, n=159, 192, 184 | 63 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Somewhat worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much worse, n=159, 192, 184 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, AS - Much better, n=159, 192, 184 | 69 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - A little better, n=174, 198, 191 | 37 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 86 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Much more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Much more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 2 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - Somewhat less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 43 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - Somewhat more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, AS - Much worse, n=152, 187, 182 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little less often, n=159, 191, 184 | 25 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, AS - Somewhat better, n=174, 198, 191 | 61 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - The same, n=159, 191, 184 | 23 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - A little more often, n=174, 198, 191 | 4 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 12, RMU -Somewhat more often, n=150, 187, 182 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 8, RMU - A little more often, n=159, 191, 184 | 5 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Global Assessment of Change Responses at Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12/Early Withdrawal | Week 4, RMU - The same, n=174, 198, 191 | 28 participants |
Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4
Participants were given a demonstration of correct inhaler use (using placebo inhalers), and the participants' competence to correctly use the demonstration inhaler was then assessed based on 3 steps: open the device, inhale the dose, and close the device. If the participants did not perform the maneuvers correctly, the step of the inhaler use that was performed incorrectly by the participants was recorded. The entire procedure was demonstrated once again. and the number of times that the participants required additional instruction (RAI) was recorded.
Time frame: Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4
Population: ITT Population. Only those participants who used the inhaler incorrectly at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 13 | 9 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0, | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 1 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 8 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 4 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 5 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 13 | 5 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 4 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0, | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 6 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI >3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 0 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI >3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 3 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI 2 Times, n= 9, 9, 13 | 4 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 6 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: RAI once, n= 9, 9, 13 | 8 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI once, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | BL: Closed the Device Incorrectly, n= 9, 9, 13 | 1 participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0, | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Inhaled the Dose Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W4: RAI 2 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: RAI 3 Times, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of Participants With the Indicated Reason for Incorrect Inhaler Use and Who Required Additional Instruction the Indicated Number of Times at Baseline, Week 2, and Week 4 | W2: Opened the Device Incorrectly, n= 0, 0, 0 | NA participants |
Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period
All unscheduled asthma-related visits to a physician's office, visits to urgent care, visits to the emergency department, and hospitalizations (ICU=intensive care unit; GW=general ward) associated with severe asthma exacerbations or other asthma-related healthcare were recorded.
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 12/Early Withdrawal
Population: ITT Population
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Day) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Emergency Room Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Night) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| Placebo | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Physician Office/Practice Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.24 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Day) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Night) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Physician Office/Practice Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.39 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.07 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Emergency Room Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Emergency Room Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Day) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization (GW) Days | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Inpatient Hospitalization Days (ICU) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Urgent Care/Outpatient Clinic Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Physician Office/Practice Visits | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0.1 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Number of the Indicated Unscheduled Asthma-related Healthcare Visits During the Treatment Period | Number of Home Visits (Night) | 0.0 Number of visits | Standard Deviation 0 |
Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at Baseline. Weighted mean was calculated using the 24-hour serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, 16, 20, 23, and 24 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.
Time frame: Baseline
Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 was performed.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline | 2.543 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.8494 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline | 2.552 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.7527 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-24 Hours Post-dose at Baseline | 2.709 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.8153 |
Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12
Pulmonary function was measured by FEV1, defined as the maximal amount of air that can be forcefully exhaled in one second. Serial FEV1 measurements were taken electronically by spirometry at the Baseline and Week 12 clinic visits. Weighted mean serial FEV1 over 0-4 hours was calculated using the serial FEV1 measurements that included the pre-dose assessment (within 30 minutes prior to dosing at Baseline and within 5 minutes prior to dosing at Week 12) and post-dose assessments after 5, 15, and 30 minutes and 1, 2, 3, and 4 hours. At each time point, the highest of 3 technically acceptable measurements were recorded. Baseline was the value obtained at Visit 3.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 12
Population: ITT Population. Weighted mean serial FEV1 was calculated in the subset of participants for whom serial FEV1 at Week 12 was performed. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline, n=120, 115, 119 | 2.563 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.8194 |
| Placebo | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12, n=96, 105, 109 | 2.636 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.8519 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12, n=96, 105, 109 | 2.657 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.7912 |
| FF 100 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline, n=120, 115, 119 | 2.522 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.7479 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Baseline, n=120, 115, 119 | 2.693 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.7626 |
| FF/VI 100/25 µg OD | Weighted Mean Serial FEV1 Over 0-4 Hours Post-dose at Baseline and Week 12 | Week 12, n=96, 105, 109 | 2.894 Liters | Standard Deviation 0.8383 |