Skip to content

A Postural Study Comparing Sitting on the Floor Versus Sitting in a Chair While Playing Video Games.

A Postural Analysis of Children Playing Video Games Sitting on the Floor vs. Sitting in a Chair: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01163955
Enrollment
56
Registered
2010-07-16
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-11-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Scoliosis

Keywords

Posture analysis, Video gaming, Forward Head Position, Rounded Shoulder Position, Spine Posture

Brief summary

To determine if sitting in a chair or sitting on the floor lends itself to better posture while playing video games.

Detailed description

Upon completion of the parental consent form, each test subject will be instructed to flip a two-sided coin to determine the sitting position of the test subject. If the flip reveals a heads, the child will be instructed to sit in a chair; chairs will be appropriately sized to allow the child to rest his/her feet on the ground. If the flip reveals a tails, the child will be instructed to sit on a small carpet piece that measures 2-feet by 2-feet. Each test subject will be taken to their gaming station which will sit approximately 8 feet away from a 55-inch flat screen television that will be on a 30-inch table and handed a wireless controller. Two gaming stations will be available with one featuring the game Lego Batman and the other featuring Lego Indiana Jones with both gaming stations testing simultaneously. The test subjects will be told they can play for 5 minutes with a Physical Therapist at each station to monitor and record the test subjects' positioning.

Interventions

OTHERTime to fatigue

5 minutes while playing video games

Sponsors

Glinn and Giordano Physical Therapy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* English and Spanish Speaking

Exclusion criteria

* Non-english or non-spanish speaking

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Posture Control of Head Position, Shoulder Position and Back Position5 minuteForward Head Position (FHP), Rounded Shoulder Position (RSP), and Thoracic spine (T/s)-Lumbar spine (L/s) positions were scored. Subscale scores of 0-3 for each FHP, RSP, and T/s L/s position were obtained. Score 0 was a perfect posture score, Score 1 was 0-1 inches out of alignment. Score 2 was 1-2 inches out of alignment. Score 3 was 2-3 inches out of alignment. Subscale scores were combined for a total score with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 9. 0 being a perfect posture score, 9 being the worst postural score.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Random recruitment at a Best Buy store. Flip of a coin decided the sitting position for the test

Pre-assignment details

Some children were excluded from the final results because they sat on their glut max and kneeled alternating throughout the test.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sitting in a Chair 5 Minutes
Sitting in a chair with back support and feet flat on the ground
26
Sitting on the Floor 5 Minutes
Sitting on the floor without back support, crossed leg style
30
Total56

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalSitting in a Chair 5 MinutesSitting on the Floor 5 Minutes
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
56 Participants26 Participants30 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age Continuous8.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
8.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
8.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
56 participants26 participants30 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants7 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
42 Participants19 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 560 / 56
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 560 / 56

Outcome results

Primary

Posture Control of Head Position, Shoulder Position and Back Position

Forward Head Position (FHP), Rounded Shoulder Position (RSP), and Thoracic spine (T/s)-Lumbar spine (L/s) positions were scored. Subscale scores of 0-3 for each FHP, RSP, and T/s L/s position were obtained. Score 0 was a perfect posture score, Score 1 was 0-1 inches out of alignment. Score 2 was 1-2 inches out of alignment. Score 3 was 2-3 inches out of alignment. Subscale scores were combined for a total score with a minimum value of 0 and a maximum value of 9. 0 being a perfect posture score, 9 being the worst postural score.

Time frame: 5 minute

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Postural Score Sitting on Floor After 5 MinutesPosture Control of Head Position, Shoulder Position and Back Position5.5 scores on a scale
Postural Score Sitting in a Chair After 5 MinutesPosture Control of Head Position, Shoulder Position and Back Position2.8 scores on a scale
Comparison: Start total score at 0 minutes is being compared to the end total score at 5 minutes while sitting in the floor.p-value: <0.000595% CI: [0, 9]t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: Start total score at 0 minutes is being compared to the end total score at 5 minutes while sitting in a chair.p-value: <0.000595% CI: [0, 9]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026