Skip to content

Delirium in the Emergency Department: Novel Screening

Delirium in the Emergency Department: Novel Screening

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01162343
Enrollment
498
Registered
2010-07-14
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2018-05-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Delirium

Keywords

Delirium, diagnosis, elderly, hospitalization

Brief summary

Delirium is an acute confusional state characterized by altered or fluctuating mental status, inattention, and either disorganized thinking or an altered level of consciousness. This form of organ dysfunction occurs in up to 10% of older emergency department (ED) patients and is associated with worsening mortality, prolonged hospital length of stay, higher health care costs, and accelerated functional and cognitive decline. Despite the negative consequences of delirium, the majority of cases are unrecognized by emergency physicians because it is not routinely screened for. In an effort to facilitate delirium screening, the investigators sought to validate three brief delirium assessments in the ED setting.

Detailed description

Delirium is often missed because emergency physicians do not routinely screen for this diagnosis. Most delirium assessments can take up to 10 minutes to perform making them less likely to be incorporated into the routine physician assessment. Using brief (\<2 minutes) and easy to use delirium assessments may ameliorate this quality of care issue. The Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) possesses these characteristics, but has only been validated in mechanically and non-mechanically ventilated intensive care unit patients. Recently, the investigators also developed the Brief Confusion Assessment Method (B-CAM) which is a modification of the CAM-ICU. The benefit is that it takes even less time than the CAM-ICU. The investigators also developed the Emergency Department Delirium Triage Screen (ED-DTS) designed to be highly sensitive and moderately specific delirium assessment for the nurse's triage assessment. It is hypothesized that a negative ED-DTS would rule out delirium, while a positive ED-DTS would require a more formal delirium assessment such as the CAM-ICU and B-CAM. These new delirium assessments require validation in older ED patients. As result, the investigators propose the following and the following specific aims: Aim #1: To validate the B-CAM in older ED patients. The B-CAM will be performed by a clinical trials associate (CTA) and principal investigator in 200 ED patients that are \> 65 years old. This instrument will be validated against a psychiatrist's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition Text Revision assessment as the reference standard. Aim #2: To validate the CAM-ICU in older ED patients. The CAM-ICU will be performed by a clinical trials associate (CTA) and principal investigator in approximately 200 ED patients that are \> 65 years old. This instrument will be validated against a psychiatrist's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition Text Revision assessment as the reference standard. Aim #3: To validate the ED-DTS in older ED patients. The ED-DTS will be performed by a clinical trials associate (CTA) and principal investigator in 200 ED patients that are \> 65 years old. This instrument will be validated against a psychiatrist's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th. Edition Text Revision assessment as the reference standard.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 65 years of age or greater * In the Emergency Department for less than 12 hour at the time of enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* Severe mental retardation or dementia * Baseline communication barriers such as aphasia, deafness, blindness, or who are unable to speak English * Refusal of consent * Previous enrollment * Comatose * Out of the hospital before the assessments are completed

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DeliriumWithin 3 hours of the study assessments.Delirium was diagnosed by a consultation-liaison psychiatrist assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. The psychiatrists performed a battery of bedside cognitive tests, including (but not limited to) Clock Drawing Test, Luria hand sequencing task, and tests for verbal fluency. A focused neurological examination (i.e., screening for paraphasic errors, tremors, tone, asterixis, frontal release signs etc.,) and evaluation for affective lability, hallucinations, and level of alertness were also conducted routinely. Confrontational naming, proverb interpretation or similarities, and assessments for apraxias were performed at the discretion of the reference psychiatrists, especially if the diagnosis of delirium was inconclusive.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

While 498 patients were enrolled, 92 were excluded from the final analysis because they did not receive a psychiatrist reference standard delirium assessment. As a result, 406 patients were included for the final analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Older Emergency Department Patients
Patients who were 65 years or older from the emergency department were enrolled.
406
Total406

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLeft ED prior to psychiatrist assessment80
Overall StudyRefused psychiatrist assessment12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOlder Emergency Department Patients
Acute Physiology Score2 points on a scale
Admitted to the hospital294 Participants
Age, Continuous73.5 years
Charlson Comorbidity Index2 points on a scale
Dementia documented in medical record24 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
Non-white
57 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race
White
349 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
202 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
204 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 498
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 498
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 498

Outcome results

Primary

Delirium

Delirium was diagnosed by a consultation-liaison psychiatrist assessment using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. The psychiatrists performed a battery of bedside cognitive tests, including (but not limited to) Clock Drawing Test, Luria hand sequencing task, and tests for verbal fluency. A focused neurological examination (i.e., screening for paraphasic errors, tremors, tone, asterixis, frontal release signs etc.,) and evaluation for affective lability, hallucinations, and level of alertness were also conducted routinely. Confrontational naming, proverb interpretation or similarities, and assessments for apraxias were performed at the discretion of the reference psychiatrists, especially if the diagnosis of delirium was inconclusive.

Time frame: Within 3 hours of the study assessments.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant DTS Sensitivity98.0 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant DTS Specificity56.2 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician DTS Sensitivity56.2 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician DTS Specificity54.8 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant bCAM Sensitivity78.0 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant bCAM Specificity96.9 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician bCAM Sensitivity84.0 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician bCAM Specificity95.8 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant CAM-ICU Sensitivity68.0 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumResearch Assistant CAM-ICU Specificity98.6 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician CAM-ICU Sensitivity72.0 percent
Older Emergency Department PatientsDeliriumPhysician CAM-ICU Specificity98.6 percent

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026