Skip to content

Comparison of Intravenous Adenosine Infusion With Regadenoson Bolus for Inducing Maximal Coronary Hyperemia

Utilization of Lexiscan (Regadenoson)in the Cardiac Catheterization Lab to Achieve Maximal Hyperemia for Coronary Physiologic Assessment With Fractional Flow Reserve

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01161121
Enrollment
46
Registered
2010-07-13
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2013-04-30
Last updated
2017-06-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Fractional flow reserve, adenosine, regadenoson

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if regadenoson is as safe and effective as adenosine when used in the cardiac catheterization lab during measurement of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve. The study hypothesis is the assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in the catheterization lab can be performed with equivalent accuracy when hyperemia is induced with IV Regadenoson compared with IV Adenosine without compromising patient safety.

Detailed description

Patients with clinical indications to be assessed by fractional flow reserve (FFR) will be included. Following diagnostic angiography in the catheterization lab, the patient will have a guide catheter placed in the artery to be assessed followed by placing a pressure guidewire down the coronary vessel and past the lesion of interest. FFR will be measured in the traditional manner, with intravenous adenosine infusing at 140 mcg/kg/min until maximal steady state hyperemia is reached. At this point, the FFR will be recorded as Pd (distal pressure from the pressure wire in the coronary artery) divided by Pa (proximal pressure from the guide catheter). The adenosine infusion will then be stopped and the patient's hemodynamics allowed to return to baseline. Once baseline state is again achieved, an intravenous bolus of regadenson (0.4 mg) will be given and FFR will be remeasured as the lowest steady state Pd/Pa. Patients will be enrolled at two sites, The University of Florida - where FFR will be measured alone, and Saint Louis University, where coronary flow will be measured simultaneously to evaluate the effect of regadenoson on coronary flow velocity as compared to adenosine. The primary endpoint of the study will be to compare the FFR achieved with adeonsine to that obtained with regadenoson.

Interventions

DRUGadenosine

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV adenosine 140 mcg/kg/min for 2 minutes.

DRUGregadenoson

Measuring FFR and Coronary Flow Reserve after administration of IV regadenoson 0.4 mg over 10 seconds.

Sponsors

University of Florida
CollaboratorOTHER
Astellas Pharma US, Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
St. Louis University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* male or female patients greater than 18 years old (If female, pt. must be post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or be non-pregnant as determined by a negative urine or serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (B-HCG) pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to enrollment. * Provided written consent approved by Institutional Review Board and provided Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization * Have at least one coronary stenosis (greater or equal to 40% but less than 70& narrowing by visual inspection) and technically accessible coronary artery into which the pressure wire may be introduced.

Exclusion criteria

* ST elevation myocardial infarction * Cardiogenic shock * Pregnancy * Total vessel occlusion * Extremely tortuous coronary arteries * Second and third degree heart block without pacemaker * Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and active bronchospasm * Less than age 18 years * Have received theophylline, aminophylline, pentoxifylline or dipyridamole within 12 hours of FFR measurement. * Has severe 3 vessel disease defined by \>80% luminal narrowing by visual inspection * Known hypersensitivity to adenosine or regadenoson * Recent uncontrolled ventricular arrhythmia * History of greater than Type I atrioventricular block, symptomatic resting bradycardia, sick sinus syndrome (without permanent pacemaker) * History of heart transplantation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV RegadenosonAt maximal, steady-state hyperemiaFFR (as calculated by the ratio of lowest Pd/Pa at maximal hyperemia) was compared between hyperemia achieved with adenosine and with regadenoson

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Heart Rate Changes With DrugDuring drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamicsMaximal heart rate documented following the administration of each agent
Side Effects of Medication AdministrationDuring drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamicsChest pain, chest discomfort, burning, flushing, headache, nausea, or shortness of breath

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients provided written consent for participation in the study prior to cardiac catheterization. Diagnostic coronary angiography was performed utilizing standard techniques. Patients in whom the operator believed needed physiologic coronary assessment with Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) were then eligible for participation in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Adenosine, Regadenoson
Each patient underwent standard intravenous adenosine infusion (140mcg/kg/min) with invasive pressure recordings for 2 min, or until maximal hyperemia occurred. Five minutes after return to baseline hemodynamics, a single intravenous bolus of 0.4 mg regadenoson was administered, and pressures were recorded for 5 min. FFR values were compared by linear regression and Bland-Altman analysis.
46
Total46

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAdenosine, Regadenoson
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
7 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
39 Participants
Age, Continuous59 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Region of Enrollment
United States
46 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
10 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
36 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
27 / 4628 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 460 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson

FFR (as calculated by the ratio of lowest Pd/Pa at maximal hyperemia) was compared between hyperemia achieved with adenosine and with regadenoson

Time frame: At maximal, steady-state hyperemia

Population: Per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdenosineDifference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson0.84 ratio (Pd/Pa)Standard Deviation 0.11
RegadenosonDifference in FFR Between IV Adenosine and IV Regadenoson0.84 ratio (Pd/Pa)Standard Deviation 0.1
Secondary

Heart Rate Changes With Drug

Maximal heart rate documented following the administration of each agent

Time frame: During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
AdenosineHeart Rate Changes With DrugBaseline Heart Rate70.8 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 11.5
AdenosineHeart Rate Changes With DrugMaximal Heart Rate81.7 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13.4
RegadenosonHeart Rate Changes With DrugBaseline Heart Rate72.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 12
RegadenosonHeart Rate Changes With DrugMaximal Heart Rate90.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 13
Secondary

Side Effects of Medication Administration

Chest pain, chest discomfort, burning, flushing, headache, nausea, or shortness of breath

Time frame: During drug infusion and until restoration of baseline hemodynamics

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
AdenosineSide Effects of Medication AdministrationDyspnea14 participants
AdenosineSide Effects of Medication AdministrationChest Pain16 participants
AdenosineSide Effects of Medication AdministrationAny Symptom27 participants
RegadenosonSide Effects of Medication AdministrationDyspnea13 participants
RegadenosonSide Effects of Medication AdministrationChest Pain13 participants
RegadenosonSide Effects of Medication AdministrationAny Symptom28 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026