Skip to content

Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among Injection Drug Users (IDUs) in Ukraine

Peer Leaders as HIV Risk Reduction Change Agents Among Injection Drug Users (IDUs) in Ukraine

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01159704
Enrollment
2304
Registered
2010-07-09
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2017-03-31
Last updated
2019-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infection, HIV Risk Behaviors

Keywords

HIV infection, Intervention, Risk-reduction, Injection drug users

Brief summary

Using a randomized clinical trial (RCT), this study is designed to assess the effectiveness of HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) risk-reduction interventions targeting injection drug users (IDUs) in three Ukraine oblasts (regions). The investigators propose to compare the effectiveness of a revised and updated manually-driven HIV testing and counseling intervention, the Counseling and Education (C & E) model developed by NIDA, with the C & E plus a manualized network intervention. At each site, Odessa, Donetsk and Nikolayev, 250 index members and 500 of their network members will be recruited through street outreach over a 32-month period and randomly assigned to C & E alone or C & E plus the network intervention. Participants will be tested for drug metabolites, interviewed using ACASI (Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing), and given a rapid test for HIV at baseline, 6 and 12-months. At six-months, network members will be asked to recruit two others they inject with but who are not in the study. Primary outcomes include knowledge, self-efficacy, injection and sex-related risk behavior reduction and partner disclosure among indexes and primary and secondary network members and intervention diffusion to secondary network members. The investigators hypothesize more positive and significant change, including injection and sex risk reduction, intervention diffusion, and partner disclosure, among indexes as well as first and second network members in the network plus C & E arm compared to C & E alone. Specific aims include: 1. To compare the effectiveness of the C & E alone with the additive effect of a network intervention plus C & E in increasing knowledge about HIV and increasing self-efficacy to practice safer injection and sex-related behaviors among indexes, primary and secondary network members. 2. To assess the effectiveness of the C & E alone with the additive effect of a network intervention plus C & E in reducing drug and sex risk behaviors among indexes, primary and secondary network members. 3. To compare the extent of intervention diffusion to second wave network members in the two arms. 4. To evaluate the extent of disclosure by HIV positive indexes and network members in the two arms

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPeer Education Model

The peer education intervention will be delivered by trained outreach workers in a group format with 8-10 indexes over five sessions spanning three weeks. The sessions will focus on knowledge of HIV transmission, self-efficacy and skills-building regarding HIV risk reduction, with an emphasis on the dissemination of such information and skills to network members.

BEHAVIORALHIV Counseling and Education Model

The C & E intervention is a manualized individual-level model consisting of two education and counseling sessions that structurally bracket confidential HIV antibody screening.

Sponsors

National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* active drug injector * 16 years of age or older * not too intoxicated to give informed consent * not planning to leave the area in the next 6 months and no pending court date that might result in incarceration * agree to HIV testing and counseling * not involved in prior project research activities in teh previous 24 months * Indexes: must be able to recruit two eligible network members into the study * Network: agree to participate in five peer educator training sessions

Exclusion criteria

* being too intoxicated at the time of the interview * impaired mentally due to physical or psychological problems to the point that they cannot voluntarily consent to participate in the study and/or respond to the interview * have a known reason why they will not be available for the intervention or the follow-up interview * have been involved in prior project research activities in the previous 24 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Intervention diffusion to secondary network membersFollow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months
HIV KnowledgeFollow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months
Self-efficacy regarding HIV risk reductionFollow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months
Injection risk behavior reductionFollow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months
Sex-related risk behavior reductionFollow-up interviews at 6 and 12 months

Countries

Ukraine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 12, 2026