Skip to content

Prophylaxis Versus On-demand Therapy Through Economic Report

Observational Study Evaluating Efficacy and Costs of Secondary Prophylaxis vs On-demand Therapy With Kogenate Bayer in Patients With Severe Haemophilia A. POTTER

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01159587
Acronym
POTTER
Enrollment
58
Registered
2010-07-09
Start date
2004-07-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2011-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemophilia A

Brief summary

The project is a controlled observational, multicenter, prospective data collection on secondary prophylaxis with Kogenate Bayer in adolescents and adults with severe haemophilia A (FVIII \< 1%). The observational period will cover at least 5 years per patient. The long-term secondary prophylaxis group will be compared versus on-demand treatment group by the assessment of orthopedic status progression and pharmacoeconomics evaluation.

Interventions

Long-term secondary prophylaxis with product administered 20-30 UI /kg three times weekly

Sponsors

Bayer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age ≥ 12 years and ≤ 55 years * severe haemophilia A (FVIII \< 1%) * absence of inhibitors (Bethesda titre \< 0.6 BU/ml) * Previous Treated Patients (prior exposure days \> 200) * Kogenate Bayer administered 20-30 IU/kg -3 times a week, for the prophylaxis group * ≥ 6 joint bleeds requiring treatment with FVIII concentrates in the previous 6 months before enrollment, for on-demand group * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* concomitant severe and chronic diseases or congenital skeletal malformation * unreliability of patient or likelihood of follow-up failure * presence of inhibitors or history of inhibitors (in the previous 2 years) * currently on immune tolerance treatment * hepatic cirrhosis or liver disease in rapid progression * AIDS * platelet count \< 75,000/mm3 * presence of conditions that influence negatively patient´s compliance * participation in another study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the efficacy, safety and pharmacoeconomic of long-term secondary prophylaxis with Kogenate Bayer in comparison to on-demand treatment with Kogenate Bayer in terms of joint bleeding episodes per yearEvery 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Efficacy, safety, pharmacoeconomic impact of secondary prophylaxis versus on demand group in terms of overall bleeding episodesEvery 6 months
Muscolo skeletal evaluation by Orthopedic Joint ScoreEvery 12 months
Radiological Evaluation by Pettersson ScoreBaseline and after 3-5 years
Health related quality of lifeEvery 12 months
cost-effectiveness and utility, patient compliance, adverse eventsEvery 6 months

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 5, 2026