Skip to content

External Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Epilepsy

Randomized Double Blind Study of External Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation for Intractable Epilepsy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01159431
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-07-09
Start date
2008-01-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2013-06-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epilepsy, Seizure Disorders

Keywords

partial seizures, poorly controlled epilepsy, intractable epilepsy, treatment resistant epilepsy, Trigeminal Nerve, Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation

Brief summary

This study investigates a new therapy for epilepsy called Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS). TNS involves external electrical stimulation of sensory nerve located above the eyes and over the forehead. The purpose of this study is to determine if TNS is safe and effective using a rigorous randomized active-control clinical trial design in 50 people with epilepsy.

Detailed description

Poorly controlled epilepsy is a disabling condition, affecting over one million Americans. Neurostimulation is a promising alternative for patients who have failed medical therapy, and who are not resective surgical candidates. Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation (TNS) is a novel form of neurostimulation, and has a strong antiepileptic effect in an animal model of seizures. Preliminary data in humans indicates TNS is well tolerated and may be effective in people with intractable epilepsy. TNS is an alternative mode of neurostimulation, because the Trigeminal Nerve can be stimulated in minimally-invasive fashion. This is a randomized double blind study of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation, which compares high stimulation to an active control. Subjects with poorly controlled partial onset seizures who meet all inclusion and exclusion criteria, enter a 6-week baseline period, and then are randomized in double-blind fashion to high or low intensity stimulation for 18 weeks. 50 subjects are to be enrolled at two sites. Study outcomes are the following: 1. Percent change in seizure frequency during the treatment period compared with the baseline (pre-treatment) period. 2. Time to the 4th seizure The primary comparisons will be between and within groups.

Interventions

External stimulation of the supraorbital branch of the Trigeminal Nerve using a digital TENs unit

Sponsors

Epilepsy Foundation
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Scientific Corporation
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Olive View-UCLA Education & Research Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 18 - 70; * No serious or progressive medical illness; * A history of intractable partial seizures; * At least two complex partial or tonic clonic generalized seizures per month in the last two consecutive months; * MRI or EEG consistent with localization-related or partial epilepsy; * Exposure to at least two antiepileptic drugs at adequate doses; * Concurrent use of at least one antiepileptic drug at adequate doses; * No change in antiepileptic dose for at least 30 days before study enrollment

Exclusion criteria

* History of non-epileptic seizures; * Inability to maintain accurate seizure calendars (self or caregiver); * Frequent use of benzodiazepines for clusters defined as greater than four times a month; * History of facial pain or trigeminal neuralgia; * Concurrent vagus nerve stimulation; * Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
50% Responder RateTreatment period, 18 weeks (end of double blind period) compared with first 6 weeksChange in responder rate, at end of study (18 weeks) Absolute percent of subjects with 50% reduction in seizures, 18 weeks compared with 6 weeks Note, the number is not a mean or median, but a fixed percentage.
Time to the 4th Seizuretreatment period (18-weeks)Number of Days to the 4th seizure
Change in Seizure Frequency18 weeksPercent change in seizure frequency from baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Ratio: Mean Percent Change in Seizures18 weeksResponse Ratio: Mean Percent Change in seizures over the treatment period, where \[T-B\] / \[T+B\] x 100%, where T = seizure frequency during the treatment period, and B = seizure frequency during the baseline period.
Mood18-weeksMean change in score on the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Inventory is a patient reported mood scale. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 63. Scores of less than 10 are considered in the normal range. Scores above 10 are consistent with depression. Higher scores indicate higher degrees of depression, with scores of \> 25 consistent with severe depression.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Subjects were recruited beginning at Olive View/UCLA and Keck-USC between 3/2008 and 10/2010

Pre-assignment details

6-week pretreatment baseline

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active
Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation-High Settings
25
Control
Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation-Low Settings
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event12
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy03
Overall Studynon-compliance11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlActiveTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Age Continuous34.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.81
33.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.57
33.44 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants16 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants9 Participants23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 254 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 251 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

50% Responder Rate

Change in responder rate, at end of study (18 weeks) Absolute percent of subjects with 50% reduction in seizures, 18 weeks compared with 6 weeks Note, the number is not a mean or median, but a fixed percentage.

Time frame: Treatment period, 18 weeks (end of double blind period) compared with first 6 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Treatment50% Responder Rate40.5 percentage of participants
Control50% Responder Rate15.6 percentage of participants
Primary

Change in Seizure Frequency

Percent change in seizure frequency from baseline

Time frame: 18 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
TreatmentChange in Seizure Frequency-16.1 percentage change in seizures per monthStandard Deviation 15.4
ControlChange in Seizure Frequency-10.5 percentage change in seizures per monthStandard Deviation 11.1
Primary

Time to the 4th Seizure

Number of Days to the 4th seizure

Time frame: treatment period (18-weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentTime to the 4th Seizure23 daysStandard Deviation 19
ControlTime to the 4th Seizure18 daysStandard Deviation 31
Treatment Group-BaselineTime to the 4th Seizure12.5 daysStandard Deviation 18
Treatment Group-Double Blind PeriodTime to the 4th Seizure15 daysStandard Deviation 28
Secondary

Mood

Mean change in score on the Beck Depression Inventory. The Beck Inventory is a patient reported mood scale. The minimum score is 0, and the maximum score is 63. Scores of less than 10 are considered in the normal range. Scores above 10 are consistent with depression. Higher scores indicate higher degrees of depression, with scores of \> 25 consistent with severe depression.

Time frame: 18-weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentMood-8.13 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
ControlMood-3.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.22
Secondary

Response Ratio: Mean Percent Change in Seizures

Response Ratio: Mean Percent Change in seizures over the treatment period, where \[T-B\] / \[T+B\] x 100%, where T = seizure frequency during the treatment period, and B = seizure frequency during the baseline period.

Time frame: 18 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TreatmentResponse Ratio: Mean Percent Change in Seizures-13.9 percentage change of RRATIOStandard Deviation 6.7
ControlResponse Ratio: Mean Percent Change in Seizures-9.0 percentage change of RRATIOStandard Deviation 6.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026