Skip to content

Baerveldt Plate Area Comparison (BPAC)

Baerveldt Plate Area Comparison (BPAC)

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01159314
Acronym
BPAC
Enrollment
69
Registered
2010-07-09
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2017-12-04
Last updated
2018-04-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Glaucoma

Keywords

glaucoma, Baerveldt Implants

Brief summary

This research is being done to compare the safety and effectiveness of two sizes of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant. A Baerveldt glaucoma implant is one of the most common types of glaucoma operations performed. This procedure works by providing a route by which fluid can drain out of the eye to decrease the intraocular pressure. The Baerveldt implant does this by placing a tube into the eye which shunts aqueous fluid to a silicone plate which is attached to the sclera (white portion of the eye). It is this plate that comes in two different sizes (250 square millimeters and 350 square millimeters). Earlier studies have shown that larger plate sizes produce lower eye pressures but that they may also result in more complications. While both Baerveldt devices are currently in use and have been shown to be safe and effective, it is unclear if one is superior to the other. The purpose of this study is to see if one size of device works better with fewer complications.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBaerveldt Device surgical Procedure

Implant surgery

Sponsors

Johns Hopkins University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age over 18 * Intra-Ocular Pressure (IOP) \> 18 mm Hg and \< 40 mm Hg on medical therapy * Previous ocular surgery limited to (cataract, corneal transplant, trabeculectomy, vitrectomy) * Consent signed

Exclusion criteria

* Unwilling or unable to give consent, unwilling to accept randomization, or unable to return for scheduled protocol visits * Pregnant or nursing * Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) vision * Iris neovascularization or proliferative retinopathy * Epithelial or fibrous downgrowth * Chronic or recurrent uveitis * Steroid-induced glaucoma * Severe posterior blepharitis * Previous cyclodestructive procedure * Conjunctival scarring from prior ocular trauma or cicatrizing disease (e.g. Stevens Johnson syndrome, ocular pemphigoid) precluding Baerveldt implantation. * Functionally significant cataract * Need for Baerveldt implant combined with other ocular procedures (ie cataract surgery,penetrating keratoplasty, or retinal surgery) or anticipated need for additional ocular surgery * Prior glaucoma drainage device (tube) implant * Prior retinal surgery with remaining silicone oil * Prior scleral buckling procedures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Acuity as assessed by Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (EDTRS)Up to 5 yearsVisual acuity is an important outcome variable in the BPAC. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity testing will be employed at the Qualifying Assessment and at every follow-up visit.The patient starts are the top of the chart and begins to read down the chart. The patient reads down the chart until he or she reaches a row where a minimum of three letters on a line cannot be read. The patient is scored by how many letters could be correctly identified. ETDRS visual acuity is required at the Qualifying Assessment and at the 1 year, 3 year, and 5 year follow-up visits

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026