Skip to content

Validity of Manipulation Taxonomy of Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy (CP) Forms

Validity of Manipulation Taxonomy of Spastic Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Forms Proposed by Ferrari A et.al.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01157494
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-07-07
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2010-07-31
Last updated
2010-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cerebral Palsy, Hemiplegia

Keywords

cerebral palsy, hemiplegia, upper limb, assessment, classification system

Brief summary

In recent years Ferrari et al. proposed a new classification of manipulation in children with spastic hemiplegia which describes five different classes by analyzing and integrating the kinematic patterns of the hand and its functional use. The investigators believe that this classification provides the clinician with clinically meaningful information, by identifying the useful strategies spontaneously adopted by the children during manipulation tasks. The aim of this study is to determine the criterion validity of the new classification of the pattern of manipulation in children with spastic hemiplegia by correlating hand manipulation classes with both the scores of the Assisting Hand Assessment and the scores of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function.

Interventions

OTHERclassification of hand manipulation function

To determine the criterion validity of the classification of the pattern of manipulation proposed by Ferrari et al. we correlated hand manipulation classes with both the scores of the two standard criteria chosen (AHA and Melbourne Assessment).

Sponsors

Azienda USL Reggio Emilia - IRCCS
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
5 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* clinical and instrumental (TC or RMN) diagnosis of child hemiplegia * age \> 5 years

Exclusion criteria

* acquired hemiplegia at the age \> 3 years * anti-spastic drug inoculations or functional surgery on the plegic UE 6 months prior to the video recordings * severe mental retardation attested by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of mental disorders IV * pharmaco-resistant epilepsy * behavioural disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Assisting Hand Assessment (AHA)the 2 assessment has to be registered within 6 monthscorrelation between the new classification of hand manipulation function and the AHA which measures the bi-manual performance, i.e. what the child usually does with the plegic hand

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function (Melbourne Assessment)the 2 assessment has to be registered within 6 monthscorrelation between the new classification of hand manipulation function and the Melbourne Assessment which measures the bi-manual performance, i.e. what the child usually does with the plegic hand

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026