Skip to content

Prediction Frozen Shoulder Validation

Determining Shoulder Kinematics in the Prediction of Progress of Frozen Shoulder Syndrome: a Prediction Method, Validation of the Method, and Clinical Application

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01157221
Enrollment
30
Registered
2010-07-05
Start date
2006-08-31
Completion date
2010-06-30
Last updated
2010-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Frozen Shoulder

Brief summary

Background: Few studies have examined the predictors of the clinical course of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome or explained the persistence of symptoms after appropriate therapy. Altered shoulder kinematics may predispose subjects to subacromial impingement, rotator cuff tendonitis, altered shoulder joint forces, and possible degenerative changes. Subsequently, a more difficult and chronic course of frozen shoulder syndrome may develop. Objective: The purposes of this study are: (1) to develop a prediction method for determining altered shoulder kinematics and associated muscular activities which are associated with the chronicity of frozen shoulder dysfunction, and (2) to validate this prediction method and analyze the impact of the method on clinical behavior. Design: For the first year, a prospective study will be conducted to develop a prediction method that will identify impaired shoulder kinematics associated with the degree of symptom-related functional disability in patients with frozen shoulder syndrome. For the second and third years, validation of the proposed prediction method will determine whether altered shoulder kinematics and associated muscular activities subject to intervention meet the prediction criteria and demonstrate improvement in their follow-up, which will be shown to improve decision making in clinical practice.

Interventions

OTHERa standardized physical therapy program

passive mobilization, stretching techniques, physical modalities (i.e., ultrasound, shortwave diathermy, and/or electrotherapy), and active exercises

OTHEREMSMTA

end-range mobilization/scapular mobilization treatment approach

Sponsors

National Taiwan University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* 50% loss of passive movement of the shoulder joint relative to the nonaffected side, in 1 or more of 3 movement directions (i.e., forward flexion, abduction in the frontal plane, or external rotation in 0° of abduction); * 13-15 and duration of complaints of at least 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

* a history of stroke with residual upper-extremity involvement, * diabetes mellitus, * rheumatoid arthritis, * rotator cuff tear, * surgical stabilization of the shoulder, * osteoporosis, or * malignancies in the shoulder region. * subjects who had pain or disorders of the cervical spine, elbow, wrist, or hand, or who had pain radiating from the shoulder to the arm, were also excluded.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Range of motionpre 4 weeks 8 weeks
Disability assessmentpre 4 weeks 8 weeks
Shoulder complex kinematicspre 4 weeks 8 weeks

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026