Skip to content

Medical Versus Surgical Management of Moderate Mitral Regurgitation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Medical Versus Surgical Management of Patients With Moderate Mitral Regurgitation Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01156441
Enrollment
0
Registered
2010-07-02
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2014-06-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Regurgitation, Myocardial Infarction

Keywords

Myocardial Infarction, Mitral Regurgitation, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Brief summary

The pilot prospective randomized trial is designed to determine the safety and feasibility of enrolling patients to surgically correct residual Mitral Regurgitation (MR) following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) for Myocardial Infarction (MI) verses ongoing medical management of MR. The investigators hypothesize that if moderate MR is corrected in this patient subset, the patients will have improved outcomes as measured by decreased number of major adverse cardiac events, including death, congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization, atrial fibrillation, deterioration of New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional status and improved quality of life.

Detailed description

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a frequent complication of myocardial infarction. Ischemic MR portends a poor prognosis on long term follow up. This pilot prospective randomized trial is a safety and feasibility trial to evaluate mitral valve repair versus surgical management in patients with residual MR after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Patients will be screened for possible inclusion to identify those that have first MI treated with primary PCI. Patients with moderate MR at 6 or more weeks following first primary PCI will be randomized to continued medical management versus surgical mitral valve repair. Patients with previous or subsequent coronary artery bypass surgery and patients with severe ventricular dysfunction will be excluded. Patients will be followed for one year from the time of randomization. The safety and feasibility data will be used to design a large trial powered to detect a difference in mortality between treatment arms. Results of this study could lead to a radical change in the treatment paradigm for patients with ischemic MR following PCI for acute MI. In addition, insight gained from this study could advance our understanding of the interrelationship between LV remodeling and MR and shed some light into the mechanism of ventricular function deterioration following MI. Moreover, it may provide a framework for the development of further recommendations with respect to the indications for surgical intervention in this patient population.

Interventions

PROCEDUREsurgical mitral valve repair w/ mitral valve annuloplasty

Mitral valve repair will be performed via median sternotomy, utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass and moderate hypothermia. The mitral valve will be approached through a left atrial incision. Following inspection of the valve, mitral valve annuloplasty will be accomplished with a complete semi-rigid annuloplasty ring. Additional techniques to address residual regurgitation will be at the discretion of the surgeon. The left atriotomy will then be closed and the patient weaned off and separated from the cardiopulmonary bypass. Intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography will be performed on all study volunteers.

Sponsors

Southern Illinois University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
19 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients who have undergone PCI for first acute MI (index MI) since 7/1/09 at MMC and STJ * documented moderate mitral regurgitation on follow up echocardiography six or more weeks after PCI procedure * English speaking

Exclusion criteria

* CABG after PCI for acute MI * History of previous MI prior to index MI * History of previous PCI or CABG prior to index PCI * EF \<30 % on the echocardiogram at 6 weeks after PCI for MI

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
patient survivalbaseline to 1 yearPatient survival will be prospectively documented for all study subjects from recruitment through one year. A stopping rule for the surgical arm is a pre-specified cut-off of 5% based on the method proposed by Kramar and Bascoul-Mollevi in Early Stopping Rules in Clinical Trials Based on Sequential Monitoring of Serious Adverse Events \[39\]. A data and safety monitoring board (DSMB) that includes five independent investigators and a statistician has been established to conduct ongoing study review to maintain safety of all participants.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
congestive heart failure requiring hospitalizationbaseline and 1 yearHospitalization for congestive heart failure will be prospectively documented for all study subjects from recruitment through one year.
mitral regurgitation gradebaseline and 1 yearTransthoracic echocardiogram will be obtained to assess the presence and or severity of mitral regurgiation.
new atrial fibrillationbaseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 yearEKG will be obtained during routine clinical follow up visits and at one year.
NYHA functional classbaseline, 3 months, 6 months and 1 yearThis will be assessed via patient questionnaire using the standard NYHA classification.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026