Critical Care, Respiration, Artificial
Conditions
Keywords
Mechanical ventilation, Chest physiotherapy, Chest wall compression
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to compare two physiotherapy techniques: chest wall compression versus chest wall compression plus increase of 10 cmH2O in inspiratory pressure.
Detailed description
1. After being placed in the supine position in bed, with head angle elevation at 30°, patients were randomized to:group 1 (G1): chest wall compression for ten minutes in chest or group 2 (G2): chest wall compression plus increase of 10 cmH2O in IP in PSV for ten minutes in chest. 2. Clinical variables and APACHE II were registered. 3. Parameters analyzed at the beginning (1) and at the end (2) of the protocol were: variation of peak pressure (ΔPp=Pp2-Pp1),variation of tidal volume (ΔVT =VT2-VT1), variation of dynamic compliance (ΔCdyn= Cdyn2-Cdyn1). 4. The amount of variation of mucus secretion aspirated (ΔSa= Sa2-Sa1) at the end was also measured
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients on mechanical ventilation over 48 hours * With ventilatory drive * Hemodynamically stable MAP\> 60 mmHg * With treatment of respiratory therapy
Exclusion criteria
* Contra indication of increased positive inspiratory pressure * Peak pressure in the upper airway \> 40 cmH2O * Osteoporosis diagnosis * Deny to participate in the study
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Variation of mucus secretion aspirated. | Two years |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic and pulmonary parameters. | Two years | The hemodynamic and pulmonary parameters were collected: Hart rate (HH), respiratory rate (f), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and peripheral arterial saturation of oxygen (SpO2); peak inspiratory pressure (Ppeak),and Tidal volume (VT) measured in the ventilator, dynamic compliance (Cdyn calculated through the formula VT/ Ppeak - PEEP) |
Countries
Brazil