Skip to content

Study of the Clinical Activity, Safety, and Tolerability of SRT2104 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase IIa Study of the Clinical Activity, Safety, and Tolerability of SRT2104 in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01154101
Enrollment
40
Registered
2010-06-30
Start date
2010-06-07
Completion date
2011-11-09
Last updated
2017-10-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis

Brief summary

This double-blind, placebo-controlled study will be conducted at 5 study centers in the United States. Approximately 30 subjects with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis will take part. The study will consist of a screening period of up to 21 days, a 12-week treatment period with 7 on-treatment clinic visits (approximately one every 2 weeks) and a post-dosing follow-up clinic visit approximately 30 days after the last dose of study drug is taken. Subjects will be randomized to receive either 250mg, 500mg or 1000mg of study drug or placebo. Study drug will be taken by mouth on a full stomach, every day for 84 days. Vital signs, clinical laboratory results (hematology, chemistry, and urinalysis), ECGs and physical examinations will be assessed at periodic intervals from Day 1 through Day 84. A skin biopsy will be taken at the beginning and the end of the dosing period to evaluate any effects of the study drug on psoriasis. Investigators will perform other psoriasis evaluations (including the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index \[PASI\] and the Physician's Global Assessment \[PGA\] at 5 different times throughout the study to quantify the effects of SRT2104 on psoriasis activity. Subjects will complete questionnaires throughout the study, to document their sense of well-being and mood at 4 different times during the study. Five blood samples will be obtained at different timepoints during the study, to measure the amount of SRT2104 in the body.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

For the placebo product, the SRT2104 drug substance will be replaced by microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel® PH 105) to match the SRT2104 investigational product.

SRT2104 drug substance is a new chemical entity which is supplied as a fine, yellowish/amber powder. The SRT2104 investigational product is prepared by packing 250 mg of micronized SRT2104 powder with no additional additives into a size 00 opaque, hard gelatin capsule, packaged in dosing bottles containing a single daily dose.

Sponsors

GlaxoSmithKline
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Sirtris, a GSK Company
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Able and willing to provide written informed consent to participate in the study * Be male or female aged 18 to 80 years (inclusive) * Have a diagnosis of clinically confirmed, stable (without recent documented flare within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit), plaque-type psoriasis for at least 6 months involving ≥10% of body surface area * Have a baseline PASI of ≥10 * Be a candidate for systemic psoriasis therapy, in the opinion of the investigator * If a female subject of child-bearing potential, be willing to use reliable contraception for the duration of the study, through the 30 day safety follow up telephone call * Be willing and able to comply with the protocol for the duration of the study

Exclusion criteria

* Has received systemic non-biologic psoriasis therapy or PUVA phototherapy within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit, or had topical psoriasis treatment or UVB phototherapy within 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit * Has received previous treatment with biologic agents within 5 drug half-lives (or within 3 months if half-life is unknown) prior to the first dose of SRT2104 * Has received a live vaccination within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit or intends to have a live vaccination during the course of the study * Use of any other non-psoriatic prescription drug therapy, with the exception of any prescription medication administered at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit; however, the administration of proton pump inhibitors during the study dosing period is prohibited * Use of any dietary or herbal supplements, with the exception of those administered at a stable dose for at least 6 weeks prior to the Screening Visit * Has received any investigational drug or experimental procedure within 30 days prior to the first dose of SRT2104 * Has an active infection (e.g., sepsis, pneumonia, abscess, etc.) or be at high risk of developing an infection, in the opinion of the investigator, prior to the first dose of SRT2104 * Has a history of a positive tuberculosis test or a positive tuberculosis test at the Screening Visit that cannot be attributed to a prior BCG inoculation * Has a positive pre-study Hepatitis B surface antigen or positive Hepatitis C antibody result within 3 months of the Screening Visit * Has a positive test for HIV antibody * Has an abnormal chest x-ray at the Screening Visit which, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude entry into the trial * Has a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with changes considered to be clinically significant on medical review including prolonged QTc intervals as defined below: * QTcB ≥450 msec (based on single or average QTc value of triplicate ECGs obtained over a brief period) * QTcB ≥480 msec in subjects with Bundle Branch Block * Has renal or liver impairment, defined as: * Serum creatinine level of ≥ 1.4 mg/dL for females and ≥ 1.5 mg/dL for males * AST and ALT ≥ 2xULN or * Alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin \> 1.5xULN (an isolated bilirubin \>1.5xULN is acceptable if bilirubin is fractionated and direct bilirubin is \<35%) * Has active neoplastic disease or history of neoplastic disease within 5 years of study entry (except for basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ which have been definitively treated with standard of care approaches) * Is pregnant or breast-feeding. Confirmation that a female subject is not pregnant must be established by negative pregnancy tests at Screening and Day 1 * Has a significant history of alcoholism or drug/chemical abuse, or consumes more than 3 standard units/day of alcohol. A standard unit of alcohol is defined as 250 mL of beer, 25 mL of spirit, or 125 mL of wine * History of sensitivity to any of the study medications, or components thereof, or a history of drug or other allergy that, in the opinion of the investigator or medical monitor, contraindicates their participation * Has an acute or chronic illness which, in the opinion of the investigator, could pose a threat or harm to the subject

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical ImportanceUp to Follow-up (Day 114)Vital sign assessments included measurements of resting heart rate and blood pressure. Potential clinical concern range for systolic blood pressure: \<85 and \>160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), for diastolic: \<45 and \>100 mmHg and heart rate: \<40 and \>110 beats per minute. Number of participants with vital signs of potential clinical importance are presented.
Assessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure12 weeksAccording to the Krueger criteria, improvement score is classified as Good improvement defined as reduction in epidermal thickness by at least 30% normalized keratinocyte differentiation but most keratinocytes still express K16. Excellent improvement defined as reduction in epidermal thickness to normal or almost normal normalized keratinocyte differentiation and absent keratinocyte expression of K16. No improvement defined as no improvement in epidermal thickness keratinocyte differentiation or K16 expression on keratinocytes. A binomial response was defined for each participant according to whether the participant had an improvement score of good or excellent improvement (response=1) or not (response=0). Number of participants with good or excellent improvement score are presented.
Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)Up to Follow-up (Day 114)An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. The AE category in the data table includes participants who experienced serious or non-serious adverse events or both.
Number of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical ConcernUp to Follow-up (Day 114)Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, red cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelets, white blood cell count and complete white blood cell count differential. Coagulation parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio. The potential clinical concern range for hematology parameters were: white blood cell count (low: \<0.67x10\^9/Liter x lower limit of normal \[LLN\] and high: \>1.82x10\^9/L x upper limit of normal \[ULN\]), neutrophil count: (low: \<0.83x10\^9/Liter x LLN), hemoglobin (low: \<0.85 gram/Liter x LLN and high: \>1.03 gram/Liter x ULN for males and \>1.13 gram/Liter x ULN for females), hematocrit with units ratio (high: \>1.02 x ULN for males and \>1.17 x ULN for females), platelet count (low: \<0.67x10\^9/Liter x LLN and high \>1.57x10\^9/Liter x ULN) and lymphocytes (low: \<0.81x10\^9/Liter x LLN).
Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical ImportanceUp to Follow-up (Day 114)The potential clinical concern range for clinical chemistry parameters were: Albumin:(low: \<0.86 gram/Liter x LLN), Calcium:(low: \<0.91 millimol/Liter \[mmol/L\] x LLN and high: \>1.06 mmol/L x ULN), Creatinine: (high: \>1.3 mmol /L x ULN), Glucose: (low: \<0.71 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.41 mmol/L x ULN), Magnesium: (low: \<0.63 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.03 mmol/L x ULN), Phosphorus: (low: \<0.8 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.14 mmol/L x ULN), Sodium: (low: \<0.96 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.03 mmol/L x ULN), Urea: (high: \>1.5 mmol/L x ULN), Gamma glutamyl transferase: (high: \>2 International units per L x ULN), Total bilirubin (high: 1.5 x ULN), both alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase (high:≥ 2x ULN Units/L) and Bicarbonate: (low: \<18 mmol/L and high: \>32 mmol/L). Number of participants with clinical chemistry abnormalities of potential clinical importance are presented.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) ValuesUp to Follow-up (Day 114)12-lead ECG was performed in the rested state with the participant in the supine position with ECG leads on for at least 5 minutes prior to ECG recording. ECGs included PR (PQ), QRS, QT and QT corrected by Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Identification of any conduction abnormalities were recorded in the eCRF. If a participant's QTc intervals were prolonged, then the ECG was done in triplicate with results reported as an average of the three ECGs. Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) values are presented.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeeks 4, 8 and 12PASI score was determined by evaluation of body surface area (BSA) covered by plaque psoriasis in 4 areas (head/neck, arms, trunk and legs with area score of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 respectively). This test included combination of both degree of involvement (assessed as per the % of affected body area using a 7-point scale such that 0=0% involvement, 1=1-9%, 2=10-29%, 3=30-49%, 4=50-69%, 5=70-89% and 6=90-100%) and severity (evaluated individually using a 5-point scale that ranged as 0=No evidence of sign, 1=slight evidence, 2=moderate evidence, 3=marked evidence and 4=very marked, most severe evidence of sign) of erythema, induration and desquamation in each of the same 4 areas. PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (worse psoriasis). Final PASI=(sum of severity score for each area)x(% body affected score x area score).
Summary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeeks 4, 8 and 12The severity of psoriatic lesions over the whole body were assessed by the investigator using the PGA scoring system. A 0 to 6 point rating scale was used, as follows: 0 = Clear (no signs of psoriasis), 1 = Almost clear (slight elevation, scale and/or erythema), 2 = Mild (mild plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 3 = Mild to moderate (mild plaque elevation with moderate erythema and/or scale), 4 = Moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 5 = Moderate to severe (marked plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 6 = Severe (very marked plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema). Higher scores indicated worse psoriasis. Participants in the SRT2104 0.25 g dose group inadvertently used an incorrect version of the PGA scale and thus do not have PGA data available. Participants in the SRT2104 0.25 g dose group inadvertently used an incorrect version of the PGA scale and thus do not have PGA data available.
Area Under Curve (AUC) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 0.25 g, 0.5 g and 1.0 g SRT2104 in the Fed State in ParticipantsPre-dose (30 minutes or less before dosing: 1 sample), 0.5 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose (1 sample), 6 to 22 hours post-dose (2 samples) up to Week 12A total of five blood samples (6 milliliter \[mL\] each) were obtained from each participant up to Week 12, for determination of SRT2104 plasma concentrations. No two samples were separated by less than an hour. One pre-dose sample was collected prior to taking study medication (30 minutes or less before dosing) at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12). A single pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected in the time interval of 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and also 3 to 6 hours post-dose at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12). Two PK samples were collected in the time interval of 6 to 22 hours post dose at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12).
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 250 Milligrams (mg), 500 mg and 1000 mg SRT2104 in the Fed State in ParticipantsOne sample: Pre-dose (30 minutes or less before dosing), One sample: 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and 3 to 6 hours post-dose and 2 samples 6 to 22 hours post dose, at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12)A total of five blood samples (6 mL each) were obtained from each participant at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12), for determination of SRT2104 plasma concentrations. No two samples were separated by less than an hour. One pre-dose sample was collected prior to taking study medication (30 minutes or less before dosing) at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12). A single pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected in the time interval of 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and also 3 to 6 hours post-dose at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12). Two PK samples were collected in the time interval of 6 to 22 hours post dose at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12).
Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Baseline (Day 1) and Days 28, 56 and 84The pharmacodynamic effects of SRT2104 was measured by biomarkers of psoriatic disease activity and/or sirtuin pathway activation (hsCRP and FGF21) in blood samples. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.
Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Baseline (Day 1) and Days 28, 56 and 84The pharmacodynamic effects of SRT2104 was measured by biomarkers of psoriatic disease activity and/or sirtuin pathway activation (hsCRP and FGF21) in blood samples. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 40 participants with moderate to severe plaque-type psoriasis were enrolled. This study was conducted at eight centers in the United States: New York (2); Missouri (1); Oregon (1); Pennsylvania (1); Rhode Island (1); Texas (1); Washington (1), from 07 June 2010 to 09 November 2011.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were asked to sign the informed consent form (ICF) at the Screening Visit, which was conducted within 21 days prior to administration of the first dose of study drug on Day 1.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Eligible participants received SRT2104 matching placebo capsules, orally, once daily after meal (at the same time every dosing day) for 12 weeks.
7
SRT2104 0.25 g
Eligible participants received SRT2104 0.25 gram (g) capsules, orally, once daily after meal (at the same time every dosing day) for 12 weeks.
9
SRT2104 0.5 g
Eligible participants received SRT2104 0.5 g capsules, orally, once daily after meal (at the same time every dosing day) for 12 weeks.
12
SRT2104 1.0 g
Eligible participants received SRT2104 1.0 g capsules, orally, once daily after meal (at the same time every dosing day) for 12 weeks.
11
No Treatment
Eligible participants in this arm received no treatment. No treatment arm was used when participants were randomized but discontinued prior to dosing.
1
Total40

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004
Overall StudyAdverse Event02110
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01201

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSRT2104 1.0 gSRT2104 0.5 gSRT2104 0.25 gNo Treatment
Age, Continuous51.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.88
46.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.63
44.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.58
49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.41
40.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.05
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
6 Participants34 Participants10 Participants10 Participants7 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants10 Participants5 Participants0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
6 Participants30 Participants6 Participants12 Participants6 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 90 / 120 / 11
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 73 / 99 / 1211 / 11
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 72 / 90 / 121 / 11

Outcome results

Primary

Assessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure

According to the Krueger criteria, improvement score is classified as Good improvement defined as reduction in epidermal thickness by at least 30% normalized keratinocyte differentiation but most keratinocytes still express K16. Excellent improvement defined as reduction in epidermal thickness to normal or almost normal normalized keratinocyte differentiation and absent keratinocyte expression of K16. No improvement defined as no improvement in epidermal thickness keratinocyte differentiation or K16 expression on keratinocytes. A binomial response was defined for each participant according to whether the participant had an improvement score of good or excellent improvement (response=1) or not (response=0). Number of participants with good or excellent improvement score are presented.

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: The Efficacy Analysis Set (EAS) population comprised of all randomized participants who took at least one dose of study medication, had at least one activity measurement at Baseline, at least one post-Baseline study visit. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboAssessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure1 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gAssessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure3 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gAssessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure4 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gAssessment of Clinical Activity by Improvement Score (Using Krueger Criteria): Number of Participants With Good or Excellent Improvement Score Based on Histological Assessments of Skin Biopsies After 12 Weeks of Exposure2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values

12-lead ECG was performed in the rested state with the participant in the supine position with ECG leads on for at least 5 minutes prior to ECG recording. ECGs included PR (PQ), QRS, QT and QT corrected by Bazett's formula (QTcB), QT corrected by Fridericia's formula (QTcF) intervals. Identification of any conduction abnormalities were recorded in the eCRF. If a participant's QTc intervals were prolonged, then the ECG was done in triplicate with results reported as an average of the three ECGs. Number of participants with abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG) values are presented.

Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Day 114)

Population: SAF Population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values3 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values1 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values4 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Values6 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. For marketed medicinal products, this also includes failure to produce expected benefits (i.e., lack of efficacy), abuse or misuse. SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, or is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant. The AE category in the data table includes participants who experienced serious or non-serious adverse events or both.

Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Day 114)

Population: Safety Analysis Set (SAF) population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)AE3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)SAE0 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)SAE2 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)AE4 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)AE9 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)SAE0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)AE11 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Any Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE)SAE1 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance

The potential clinical concern range for clinical chemistry parameters were: Albumin:(low: \<0.86 gram/Liter x LLN), Calcium:(low: \<0.91 millimol/Liter \[mmol/L\] x LLN and high: \>1.06 mmol/L x ULN), Creatinine: (high: \>1.3 mmol /L x ULN), Glucose: (low: \<0.71 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.41 mmol/L x ULN), Magnesium: (low: \<0.63 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.03 mmol/L x ULN), Phosphorus: (low: \<0.8 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.14 mmol/L x ULN), Sodium: (low: \<0.96 mmol/L x LLN, high: \>1.03 mmol/L x ULN), Urea: (high: \>1.5 mmol/L x ULN), Gamma glutamyl transferase: (high: \>2 International units per L x ULN), Total bilirubin (high: 1.5 x ULN), both alanine amino transferase and aspartate amino transferase (high:≥ 2x ULN Units/L) and Bicarbonate: (low: \<18 mmol/L and high: \>32 mmol/L). Number of participants with clinical chemistry abnormalities of potential clinical importance are presented.

Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Day 114)

Population: SAF Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance4 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance3 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance5 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Chemistry Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance5 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern

Hematology parameters included hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, red cell distribution width, mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, platelets, white blood cell count and complete white blood cell count differential. Coagulation parameters included activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time/international normalized ratio. The potential clinical concern range for hematology parameters were: white blood cell count (low: \<0.67x10\^9/Liter x lower limit of normal \[LLN\] and high: \>1.82x10\^9/L x upper limit of normal \[ULN\]), neutrophil count: (low: \<0.83x10\^9/Liter x LLN), hemoglobin (low: \<0.85 gram/Liter x LLN and high: \>1.03 gram/Liter x ULN for males and \>1.13 gram/Liter x ULN for females), hematocrit with units ratio (high: \>1.02 x ULN for males and \>1.17 x ULN for females), platelet count (low: \<0.67x10\^9/Liter x LLN and high \>1.57x10\^9/Liter x ULN) and lymphocytes (low: \<0.81x10\^9/Liter x LLN).

Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Day 114)

Population: SAF Population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern0 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern1 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Hematology and Coagulation Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Concern2 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance

Vital sign assessments included measurements of resting heart rate and blood pressure. Potential clinical concern range for systolic blood pressure: \<85 and \>160 millimeter of mercury (mmHg), for diastolic: \<45 and \>100 mmHg and heart rate: \<40 and \>110 beats per minute. Number of participants with vital signs of potential clinical importance are presented.

Time frame: Up to Follow-up (Day 114)

Population: SAF Population.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance0 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Vital Signs of Potential Clinical Importance2 Participants
Secondary

Area Under Curve (AUC) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 0.25 g, 0.5 g and 1.0 g SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants

A total of five blood samples (6 milliliter \[mL\] each) were obtained from each participant up to Week 12, for determination of SRT2104 plasma concentrations. No two samples were separated by less than an hour. One pre-dose sample was collected prior to taking study medication (30 minutes or less before dosing) at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12). A single pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected in the time interval of 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and also 3 to 6 hours post-dose at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12). Two PK samples were collected in the time interval of 6 to 22 hours post dose at any Visit 4 (Week 4), Visit 6 (Week 8) or Visit 8 (Week 12).

Time frame: Pre-dose (30 minutes or less before dosing: 1 sample), 0.5 to 2 hours and 3 to 6 hours post-dose (1 sample), 6 to 22 hours post-dose (2 samples) up to Week 12

Population: PK population which comprised of all participants who received at least one dose of SRT2104 for whom a PK sample was obtained and analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboArea Under Curve (AUC) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 0.25 g, 0.5 g and 1.0 g SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants2148.08 Nanogram x hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 1247.182
SRT2104 0.25 gArea Under Curve (AUC) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 0.25 g, 0.5 g and 1.0 g SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants4189.46 Nanogram x hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 2143.021
SRT2104 0.5 gArea Under Curve (AUC) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 0.25 g, 0.5 g and 1.0 g SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants8358.45 Nanogram x hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)Standard Deviation 7466.966
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104

The pharmacodynamic effects of SRT2104 was measured by biomarkers of psoriatic disease activity and/or sirtuin pathway activation (hsCRP and FGF21) in blood samples. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 28, 56 and 84

Population: EAS population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 28-61.67 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 269.031
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 84-86.12 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 300.144
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56-67.04 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 276.937
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 28-94.53 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 154.104
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 84-189.60 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 364.475
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56-72.72 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 366.774
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56148.93 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 305.634
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 2856.93 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 177.244
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 8458.31 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 223.237
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 28329.82 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 930.329
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 84-673.32 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 1590.594
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF21) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56268.39 Picogram per milliliterStandard Deviation 961.01
Secondary

Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104

The pharmacodynamic effects of SRT2104 was measured by biomarkers of psoriatic disease activity and/or sirtuin pathway activation (hsCRP and FGF21) in blood samples. Baseline was Day 1. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting Baseline values from post-Baseline values.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Days 28, 56 and 84

Population: EAS population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 280.11 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 2.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 840.66 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 3.895
PlaceboChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 560.59 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 3.552
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 28-0.14 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 1.148
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 84-0.16 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 1.055
SRT2104 0.25 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56-0.18 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 1.897
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56-1.31 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 3.261
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 281.18 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 1.954
SRT2104 0.5 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 84-0.75 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 3.159
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 28-0.96 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 2.211
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 840.27 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 1.351
SRT2104 1.0 gChange From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) as an Indicator of the Pharmacodynamic Effects of SRT2104Day 56-0.48 mg per LiterStandard Deviation 2.64
Secondary

Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 250 Milligrams (mg), 500 mg and 1000 mg SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants

A total of five blood samples (6 mL each) were obtained from each participant at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12), for determination of SRT2104 plasma concentrations. No two samples were separated by less than an hour. One pre-dose sample was collected prior to taking study medication (30 minutes or less before dosing) at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12). A single pharmacokinetic (PK) sample was collected in the time interval of 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and also 3 to 6 hours post-dose at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12). Two PK samples were collected in the time interval of 6 to 22 hours post dose at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12).

Time frame: One sample: Pre-dose (30 minutes or less before dosing), One sample: 0.5 to 2 hours post-dose and 3 to 6 hours post-dose and 2 samples 6 to 22 hours post dose, at any Visit 4 (Day 28 or Week 4), Visit 6 (Day 56 or Week 8) or Visit 8 (Day 84 or Week 12)

Population: PK population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 250 Milligrams (mg), 500 mg and 1000 mg SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants261.64 ng/mLStandard Deviation 134.403
SRT2104 0.25 gMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 250 Milligrams (mg), 500 mg and 1000 mg SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants406.67 ng/mLStandard Deviation 237.787
SRT2104 0.5 gMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of 12 Weeks of Dosing With 250 Milligrams (mg), 500 mg and 1000 mg SRT2104 in the Fed State in Participants1005.89 ng/mLStandard Deviation 813.346
Secondary

Number of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of Exposure

PASI score was determined by evaluation of body surface area (BSA) covered by plaque psoriasis in 4 areas (head/neck, arms, trunk and legs with area score of 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 respectively). This test included combination of both degree of involvement (assessed as per the % of affected body area using a 7-point scale such that 0=0% involvement, 1=1-9%, 2=10-29%, 3=30-49%, 4=50-69%, 5=70-89% and 6=90-100%) and severity (evaluated individually using a 5-point scale that ranged as 0=No evidence of sign, 1=slight evidence, 2=moderate evidence, 3=marked evidence and 4=very marked, most severe evidence of sign) of erythema, induration and desquamation in each of the same 4 areas. PASI score ranges from 0 (no psoriasis) to 72 (worse psoriasis). Final PASI=(sum of severity score for each area)x(% body affected score x area score).

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: Efficacy Analysis Set (EAS) population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.25 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 14 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 13 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 15 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 16 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 13 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 12 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 18 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 18 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 11 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 14 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 75% Improvement in PASI score from Day 10 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: 50% Improvement in PASI score from Day 14 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gNumber of Participants With Clinical Activity in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) Score After 4, 8, and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: 25% Improvement in PASI score from Day 17 Participants
Secondary

Summary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of Exposure

The severity of psoriatic lesions over the whole body were assessed by the investigator using the PGA scoring system. A 0 to 6 point rating scale was used, as follows: 0 = Clear (no signs of psoriasis), 1 = Almost clear (slight elevation, scale and/or erythema), 2 = Mild (mild plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 3 = Mild to moderate (mild plaque elevation with moderate erythema and/or scale), 4 = Moderate (moderate plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 5 = Moderate to severe (marked plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema), 6 = Severe (very marked plaque elevation, scale and/or erythema). Higher scores indicated worse psoriasis. Participants in the SRT2104 0.25 g dose group inadvertently used an incorrect version of the PGA scale and thus do not have PGA data available. Participants in the SRT2104 0.25 g dose group inadvertently used an incorrect version of the PGA scale and thus do not have PGA data available.

Time frame: Weeks 4, 8 and 12

Population: EAS Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Minimal0 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Moderate2 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Mild1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Very Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Clear0 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Very Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Moderate2 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Mild1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Minimal0 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Clear0 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Very Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Severe1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Moderate2 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Mild1 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Minimal0 Participants
PlaceboSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Mild3 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Severe2 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Moderate2 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Mild3 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Moderate9 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Minimal1 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Minimal2 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Mild1 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Moderate6 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Severe2 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Minimal0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Severe1 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 0.5 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Moderate5 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Moderate3 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Mild7 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Minimal1 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Mild3 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 8: Clear0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Severe1 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Very Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Moderate4 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Mild6 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 4: Minimal0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Severe0 Participants
SRT2104 1.0 gSummary of Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score After 4, 8 and 12 Weeks of ExposureWeek 12: Minimal3 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 3, 2026