Skip to content

Manual Therapy Effectiveness in Comparison With Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Patients With Neck Pain

Primary Care Randomized Clinical Trial: Manual Therapy Effectiveness in Comparison With TENS in Patients With Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01153737
Enrollment
90
Registered
2010-06-30
Start date
2005-05-31
Completion date
2007-05-31
Last updated
2017-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

Neck pain, Primary Health Care, Manual Therapy, TENS

Brief summary

This study investigated effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) with Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to reduce pain intensity in patients with mechanical neck disorder (MND). A randomized multi-centered controlled clinical trial was performed in 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in Madrid Region.

Detailed description

The purpose of tis study is to evaluate the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) with Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to reduce pain intensity in patients with mechanical neck disorder (MND). Design: randomized multi-centered controlled clinical trial. Location: 12 Primary Care Physiotherapy Units in Madrid Region. Ninety patients were included with diagnoses of subacute or chronic MND without neurological damage, 47 patients received MT and 43 TENS. The primary outcome was pain intensity measured in millimeters using the Visual Analogue Scale. Also disability, quality of life, adverse effects and sociodemographic and prognosis variables were measured. Three evaluations were performed (before, when the procedure finished and six months after). Seventy one patients (79%) completed the follow-up measurement at six months. In more than half of the treated patients the procedure had a clinically relevant short term result after having ended the intervention, when either MT or TENS was used. The success rate decreased to one third of the patients 6 months after the intervention. No differences can be found in the reduction of pain, in the decrease of disability nor in the quality of life between both therapies. Both analyzed physiotherapy techniques produce a short term pain reduction that is clinically relevant.

Interventions

Ten treatment sessions of 30 minutes of MT or TENS on alternate days were provided by primary care physical therapists. MT techniques: neuromuscular technique, postisometric stretching, spray and stretching and Jones technique.

OTHERTENS

Ten treatment sessions of 30 minutes of MT or TENS on alternate days were provided by primary care physical therapists. TENS electrode placement were: in the painful area, in the metamere or in the nerve´s pathway. It was applied at a frequency of 80 Hz, with ≤150 µs pulse duration and adjusted amplitude.

Sponsors

University of Alcala
CollaboratorOTHER
Gerencia Atencion Primaria Area 3
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* diagnoses of subacute or chronic MND without neurological damage, according to the Classification of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders (Spitzer 1987); * full physical and psychological capacity to follow the clinical trial's requirements; * consent to participate

Exclusion criteria

* Signs of neurological damage according to the Neurologic Screening Checklist (Hoving et al. 2002), * pregnant women, * previous neck rachis surgery, * patients who received physical therapy or an alternative treatment of the neck or shoulder 6 months prior to the beginning of the study, * patients who intended to receive other treatments during the study * patients with important psychiatric disorders or other health problems that would contraindicate the techniques to be used (i.e. pacemaker). * Patients with neck pain caused by an inflammatory, neurological or rheumatic disease, severe osteoporosis, fracture, luxation or vertebrobasilar insufficiency

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Pain intensity measured in millimeters (Visual Visual Analogue Scale, VAS)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026