Cardiovascular Disease, Hypertension
Conditions
Keywords
Hypertension, ACE, ARB, real life data, CVD, cost effectiveness
Brief summary
The planned Study will be a retrospective study on the effect of ACE's vs. candesartan on cardiovascular events and on health economic effects in a real life setting in Sweden.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* all patients found in electronic patient journals at the participating centres, who were prescribed either ACEis (ATC-C09A-B) or ARBs (C09C-D) for hypertension from 1 January 1999 - 31 December 2007. The first date of such a prescription starts the observation time and is called the index prescription.
Exclusion criteria
* No history of cardiovascular disease. * Ongoing malignancy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Investigate the risk of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) and new onset diabetes in patients on primary hypertensive treatment with ACE or candesartan for hypertension | Time to first CV event calculated as the time (in days) between date of index prescription and date of the first registration of a CV event. Patients will be followed for min. 1 wk and up to 9 yrs (1999-2007). Median follow up time is estimated to 2 yrs. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| To investigate the risk of CVD and new onset diabetes in patients treated with specific types of ACEi or candesartan for hypertension | Time to first CV event calculated as the time (in days) between date of index prescription and date of the first registration of a CV event. Patients will be followed for min. 1 wk and up to 9 yrs (1999-2007). Median follow up time is estimated to 2 yrs. |
| To investigate the risk of hypertensive organ damage, renal failure and hyperlipidemia for patients treated with ACEi or candesartan | Time to first CV event calculated as the time (in days) between date of index prescription and date of the first registration of a CV event. Patients will be followed for min. 1 wk and up to 9 yrs (1999-2007). Median follow up time is estimated to 2 yrs. |
| Evaluate differences in use of health care resources, and assess the potential long term cost effectiveness | Differences in health care consumption will be estimated through models incorporating normalised costs, level of care, age, gender and study year |
Countries
Sweden