Skip to content

A Test of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain

Phase II Study of the Effectiveness of a Device and Distraction for Pediatric Immunization Pain in Multiple Age Groups

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01152489
Enrollment
345
Registered
2010-06-29
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-04-30
Last updated
2011-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Procedural Pain

Keywords

Pain

Brief summary

The hypothesis of this study is that distraction cards used by the caretaker along with a vibrating cold pack placed proximal to the site of immunization will decrease the pain of routine pediatric immunizations when compared to a placebo device or standard care.

Detailed description

Needle pain is the most common and the most feared source of childhood pain, resulting in needle phobia for 10$ of adults. Current standard of care for immunizations in the US is no pain relief. An inexpensive, immediately effective form of needle pain control could reduce needle phobia or vaccine refusal in the long term if demonstrated to be effective for immunization pain. Distraction can decrease procedural distress in children by 50%. The effect of using a multi-modal pain and distraction relieving approach has not been rigorously studied.

Interventions

DEVICEDevice: Buzzy

Buzzy, the vibrating cold pack, is held in place with a velcro strap or pressed by caretaker or nurse immediately prior and during immunizations. The vibration is activated and the device remains in place during the shot, moving locations if multiple shots are given. Distraction cards with pictures on one side and questions on the other are shown to the child while the caretaker asks the finding and seeking questions on the back.

DEVICEBuzzy: sham device

The identical device without batteries or a cold pack is held in place proximal to the site with a velcro strap or pressed by parent or nurse immediately prior to immunizations. The device remains in place throughout the procedure, moving locations to complete multiple shots.

Sponsors

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
CollaboratorNIH
MMJ Labs LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Months to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* children receiving routine immunizations

Exclusion criteria

* no caregiver present * chronic illness requiring frequent injections * clear cognitive impairments affecting communication

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain of immunization5 minutes during or immediately after immunizationsInfants' and toddlers' pain is assessed by coding videotapes using the FLACC (face, legs, activity, crying and consolability) scale. Patients age 4 and older rate pain using self-report via the Faces Pain Scale Revised.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain from immunization using observational measures5 minutes immediately following immunizationCaretakers and nurses administering the shots rate pain using a 10cm Visual analog scale from no pain to most pain possible; duration of infant cry is also assessed following the procedure using coded videotape recordings.
Treatment satisfaction5 minutes after immunizations10 item scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree with ten parameters of satisfaction with the methods and concepts of immunization.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026