Skip to content

Usefulness of Exhaled NO in the Differential Diagnosis Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Bacterial Pneumonia

Usefulness of Exhaled NO in the Differential Diagnosis Acute Eosinophilic Pneumonia and Community Acquired Pneumonia

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01152424
Enrollment
50
Registered
2010-06-29
Start date
2010-07-31
Completion date
2011-12-31
Last updated
2011-06-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute, Eosinophilic Pneumonia

Keywords

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia, Exhaled nitric oxide

Brief summary

Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is diagnosed by cell count analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. However, the performance of bronchoscopy is not easy for patients with AEP, because they usually have hypoxia. Exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is usually elevated in the patients with eosinophilic inflammation such as asthma, but there is no previous studies FeNO in the patients with AEP. Investigators hypothesized that FeNO elevated significantly in patients with AEP, and FeNO can be used as non-invasive diagnostic method in patients who are clinically suspected with AEP, especially when the performance of bronchoscopy is difficult.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients who visited the study hospital with bilateral pneumonic infiltration.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who do not agree with our study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The difference of FeNO in AEP and Community Acquired PneumoniaSix months

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 28, 2026