Skip to content

Considering Patient Diet Preferences to Optimize Weight Loss

Considering Patient Diet Preference to Optimize Weight Loss

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01152359
Acronym
DietChoice
Enrollment
207
Registered
2010-06-29
Start date
2011-05-31
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2019-04-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity

Keywords

obesity, diet, low carbohydrate, diet, fat-restricted, food preferences, quality of life, patient compliance

Brief summary

Obesity is increasingly common and can lead to decreased quality of life, increased medical and psychiatric illness, high health care costs, and early mortality. The problem of obesity is as great in veterans as it is in the general public. Adherence to dietary therapy for obesity is often inadequate, possibly because patients' food preferences are not considered during dietary counseling. Allowing patients to choose a diet based on their food preferences may increase their motivation to adhere to diet counseling. This, in turn, could enhance their weight loss success and, ultimately, reduce the many health complications and costs of obesity. The proposed study will examine whether assessing a person's food preferences, and then allowing the person to choose from two commonly prescribed diets, results in greater weight loss success.

Detailed description

The prevalence of obesity (body mass index \[BMI\] 30 kg/m2) in US adults has skyrocketed over the past 30 years, and is currently as high or higher in veterans as it is in non-veterans. Thus, identifying effective strategies for treating obesity is both a public health and a VA priority. A variety of diet approaches have proven successful in achieving moderate weight loss in many individuals. Yet, most diet interventions fail to achieve meaningful weight loss in more than a few individuals. This failure likely results from inadequate adherence to the diet. It is widely felt, but not empirically shown, that targeting the diet to an individual's food preferences will enhance adherence, thereby improving weight loss outcomes. This study will test the commonly proposed assumption that helping patients choose a diet based on their dietary preferences will increase weight loss success relative to assigning or recommending one diet. The proposed study is a 2-arm randomized controlled trial involving 216 outpatients from Durham VA Medical Center. Participants must be obese (BMI 30 kg/m) VAMC outpatients without unstable health issues. Participants in the experimental arm (Choice) will select from two of the most widely studied diets for weight loss, either a low-carbohydrate, calorie-unrestricted diet (LCD) or a low-fat, reduced-calorie diet (LFD). This choice will be informed by results from a validated food preference questionnaire and a discussion of available diet options with trained personnel. As may occur in the clinical setting, the Choice participants will also have the opportunity to switch to the other diet after 3 months if unsuccessful or dissatisfied with their primary selection. The Choice intervention is designed to enhance the three psychological needs of a person according to self-determination theory (SDT): competence, relatedness, and, in particular, autonomy. This should maximize intrinsic motivation, thereby improving adherence to diet recommendations and increasing weight loss. Participants in the Control arm will be randomly assigned to follow one of the two diets for the duration of follow-up. All participants will receive diet-appropriate counseling in small group meetings every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, then monthly for another 24 weeks. All participants will also receive brief telephone counseling involving individual goal setting and problem solving halfway through each month in the latter 24 weeks. The primary outcome is weight change from baseline to 48 weeks. Secondary outcomes include adherence to diet by food frequency questionnaire and obesity-specific health-related quality of life. Exploratory analyses will examine whether the impact of choice versus lack of choice on weight loss is moderated by individual differences in the SDT constructs of autonomy orientation, competence, and relatedness. If assisting patients to choose their diet enhances adherence and increases weight loss, the results will support the provision of diet options to veterans and non-veterans alike, and bring us one step closer to remediating the obesity epidemic faced by the VA and other healthcare systems.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALChoice

Participants are allowed to choose between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and their food preferences (Choice arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

BEHAVIORALControl

Participants are randomly assigned to (rather than getting to choose, as in the experimental arm) a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss (Control arm). Then they receive counseling on their chosen diet in a small group format. The low-carbohydrate diet limits carbohydrate intake to 20-40 grams/day initially. The low-fat diet restricts saturated fat to below 30% of daily calories and has a 500-1000 calorie deficit. Group sessions are every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. Participants also receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity. Participants in this arm do not have the option to switch diets at 12 weeks.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 74 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Body mass index 30 or greater * Stable health * Desire to lose weight * Agrees to attend regular visits * Access to telephone and reliable transportation * Has a Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) provider

Exclusion criteria

* Certain chronic or unstable disease (kidney or liver disease, type 1 diabetes, hemoglobin A1c 12% or more, insulin use, unstable heart disease, transplant recipient, blood pressure 160/100 or greater, fasting blood triglycerides 600 or greater, LDL cholesterol 190 or greater) * Pregnancy, breastfeeding, lack of birth control * Active dementia, psychiatric illness, or substance abuse (past year) * Weight loss therapy in previous month * Pacemaker or defibrillator * Enrolled in another study that might affect measurements * Previously in study of low-carbohydrate or low-fat diet for weight loss * Unable to complete all study measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 WeeksBaseline, 48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)48 weeks
Change in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 WeeksBaseline, 48 weekschange in obesity-specific health-related quality of life as measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire total score from baseline to 48 weeks Minimum 0 Maximum 100 Higher score means better

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Choice Arm
Upon starting the study, participants are able to make an informed choice between a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss after receiving information about these diets and about their food preferences as assessed by a questionnaire. Then participants will receive counseling regarding their chosen diet in a small group format. Sessions will take place every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then group sessions will alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls will focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. In addition to counseling on diet during group sessions and phone calls, participants will receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity.
105
Control Arm
Upon starting the study, participants are randomly assigned to a low-carbohydrate or a low-fat diet for weight loss. Then participants will receive counseling regarding their chosen diet in a small group format. Sessions will take place every 2 weeks for 24 weeks then group sessions will alternate with telephone calls every 2 weeks for 24 weeks. Phone calls will focus on goal setting to maximize weight loss. In addition to counseling on diet during group sessions and phone calls, participants will receive counseling on behavioral techniques and physical activity.
102
Total207

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicChoice ArmTotalControl Arm
Age, Continuous54 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
55 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
45 Participants106 Participants61 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
6 Participants8 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
54 Participants93 Participants39 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
105 participants207 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
28 Participants55 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
77 Participants152 Participants75 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 10510 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 1054 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 Weeks

Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Choice ArmPercent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 Weeks-4.2 percentage of weight change
Control ArmPercent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to 48 Weeks-5.3 percentage of weight change
p-value: <0.0595% CI: [-0.8, 2.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Change in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 Weeks

change in obesity-specific health-related quality of life as measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire total score from baseline to 48 weeks Minimum 0 Maximum 100 Higher score means better

Time frame: Baseline, 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Choice ArmChange in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 Weeks10.5 score on a scale
Control ArmChange in Obesity-specific Health-related Quality of Life as Measured by Impact Of Weight On Quality Of Life-Lite (IWQOL-Lite) Questionnaire From Baseline to 48 Weeks11.2 score on a scale
p-value: 0.6595% CI: [-4.1, 2.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Diet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)

Time frame: 48 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Choice ArmDiet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)9.4 percentage of deviation from goal
Control ArmDiet Adherence as Measured by Block Food-frequency Questionnaire (Absolute Percentage Deviation From the Goal Macronutrient Intake--<30% Fat for Low-fat Diet or <10% Carbohydrate for Low-carbohydrate Diet)10.3 percentage of deviation from goal
p-value: 0.6695% CI: [-4.9, 3.1]Mixed Models Analysis

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026