Skip to content

Rechallenge of Imatinib in GIST Having no Effective Treatment: RIGHT

A Prospective, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Phase III Trial of Imatinib Re-Challenge in Patients With Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Who Had Benefit From Prior Imatinib But Progression From Both Imatinib and Sunitinib

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01151852
Enrollment
81
Registered
2010-06-29
Start date
2010-06-30
Completion date
2013-03-31
Last updated
2020-01-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors

Keywords

Imatinib, Re-challenge

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes following resumption of dosing (re-challenge) with Imatinib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with advanced/incurable Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors following failure of prior imatinib and sunitinib therapies.

Interventions

DRUGImatinib

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive imatinib at a dose of 400mg/day, taken once daily with food, in the form of 100-mg tablets. The study medication will be administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.

DRUGPlacebo

Patients will be randomly assigned to receive placebo at a dose of 400mg/day, taken once daily with food, in the form of 100-mg tablets. The study medication will be administered until disease progression or withdrawal of consent.

Sponsors

Asan Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 18 years and older * Patients with metastatic or unresectable malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumour which has been histologically confirmed by the detection of CD117 on immunohistochemical staining or genetically confirmed by the detection of mutation in KIT or PDGFRα genes on direct sequencing of tumor DNA. * Prior benefit from 1st line imatinib defined as complete response, partial response, or stable disease at 6 months after the start of 1st line imatinib * Patients whose disease has progressed despite at least both prior imatinib therapy (400mg/day) and then subsequently also failure of prior sunitinib therapy. * ECOG(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) performance status 0 \ 3 * Adequate bone marrow function as defined by platelets ≥ 75 x 109/L and neutrophils ≥ 1.5 x 109/L * Adequate renal function, with serum creatinine \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal * Adequate hepatic function with serum total bilirubin \< 1.5 x upper limit of normal, alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase \< 2.5 x upper limit of normal in the absence of liver metastases, or \< 5 x upper limit of normal in the presence of liver metastases. * Expected life expectancy of greater than 12 weeks in the absence of any intervention * No other malignant disease apart from non-melanotic skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix or any other cancer except where treated with curative intent \> 5 years previously without evidence of relapse * Written, informed consent to the study

Exclusion criteria

* Medical or psychiatric conditions that compromise the patient's ability to give informed consent or to complete the protocol or a history of non- compliance * Last dose of radiotherapy received within 4 weeks before the start of study treatment, excluding palliative radiotherapy * Obstruction of gastrointestinal tract * Active gastrointestinal bleeding * Myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to the study medication, and other clinically significant heart disease (e.g., unstable angina, congestive heart failure or uncontrolled hypertension) * Evidence of severe or uncontrolled systemic disease or any concurrent condition which in the investigator's opinion makes it undesirable for the patient to participate in the study or which would jeopardise compliance with the protocol * Female patients who are pregnant or breast-feeding. Female patients must have had a negative pregnancy test within one week before starting imatinib.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survivalup tp12 weeksTo compare the progression free survival (PFS) assessed by the blinded independent central review following resumption of dosing (re-challenge) with Imatinib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST following failure of at least prior imatinib and sunitinib therapies

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)Up to 3yearsTo compare the overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in both arms of the study
Disease Control Rateup to 12 weeksInclusion of complete response, partial response or stable disease Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR; Progressive disease (PD), \>20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), Insufficient change to qualify for PR or PD.
Progression Free Survivalup to 12 weeksTo compare PFS assessed by investigators
Response RateUp to 12weeksTumour responses were initially determined by the local investigators in accordance with RECIST 1.0.Treatment decisions were based on local onsite radiological review. All imaging data were subsequently collected, anonymised, and reviewed centrally in a double-blind manner by two external academic radiology reviewers. Response assessment was determined in a masked central review by use of RECIST1.1.
Safety and Tolerability of ImatinibUp to 3yearspercentage of patients who experienced toxicity from study treatment to evaluate the safety and tolerability of imatinib re-challenge in this patient population

Countries

South Korea

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between July 20, 2010, and Jan 17, 81 patients were enrolled in Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Pre-assignment details

Randomization was done in a double-blind manner and stratified by performance status (0-1 vs 2-3) and by the number of previous lines of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (2 or less vs more than 2).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Imatinib
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive imatinib at a dose of 400mg/day, taken once daily with food, in the form of 100-mg tablets. The study medication will be administered until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent.
41
Placebo
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive placebo at a dose of 400mg/day, taken once daily with food, in the form of 100-mg tablets. The study medication will be administered until disease progression or withdrawal of consent.
40
Total81

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboImatinibTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
15 Participants12 Participants27 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
25 Participants29 Participants54 Participants
Age, Continuous59.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4
58.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
Region of Enrollment
Korea, Republic of
40 participants41 participants81 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
14 Participants12 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants29 Participants55 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
41 / 4139 / 40
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 412 / 40

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival

To compare the progression free survival (PFS) assessed by the blinded independent central review following resumption of dosing (re-challenge) with Imatinib plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care in patients with unresectable or metastatic GIST following failure of at least prior imatinib and sunitinib therapies

Time frame: up tp12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ImatinibProgression-free Survival1.8 Months
PlaceboProgression-free Survival0.9 Months
Secondary

Disease Control Rate

Inclusion of complete response, partial response or stable disease Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR; Progressive disease (PD), \>20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Stable Disease (SD), Insufficient change to qualify for PR or PD.

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ImatinibDisease Control Rate32 percentage of participants
PlaceboDisease Control Rate5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Overall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)

To compare the overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP) in both arms of the study

Time frame: Up to 3years

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
ImatinibOverall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)Overall survival8.2 Months
ImatinibOverall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)Time to progression1.8 Months
PlaceboOverall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)Overall survival7.5 Months
PlaceboOverall Survival(OS) and Time to Progression(TTP)Time to progression0.9 Months
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

To compare PFS assessed by investigators

Time frame: up to 12 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
ImatinibProgression Free Survival1.8 Months
PlaceboProgression Free Survival1.7 Months
Secondary

Response Rate

Tumour responses were initially determined by the local investigators in accordance with RECIST 1.0.Treatment decisions were based on local onsite radiological review. All imaging data were subsequently collected, anonymised, and reviewed centrally in a double-blind manner by two external academic radiology reviewers. Response assessment was determined in a masked central review by use of RECIST1.1.

Time frame: Up to 12weeks

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ImatinibResponse Rate0 percentage of participants
PlaceboResponse Rate0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety and Tolerability of Imatinib

percentage of patients who experienced toxicity from study treatment to evaluate the safety and tolerability of imatinib re-challenge in this patient population

Time frame: Up to 3years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ImatinibSafety and Tolerability of Imatinib100 percentage of participants
PlaceboSafety and Tolerability of Imatinib98 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 10, 2026